yitbos
What’s their latest schtick that Rush was talking about? Grayouts?
Nutso. When that is proven ridiculous, they’ll just move on to something else. And I’m sure it’s eating them alive to know that trading carbon credits isn’t going to make them all billionaires.
Citation, please.
They have never stated such. Please point to where the relevant text would include breathing as a case where it is considered polluting.
Micturation is a natural human bodily function, but you wouldn't want it directed at your beer. Context is everything.
The EPA's finding doesn't say carbon dioxide, or CO2, is by itself a pollutant -- it is, after all, a gas that humans exhale and plants inhale. Rather, it is the increasing concentrations of the gas that concern the agency.That law was signed by President Bush, and it has nothing to do with breathing. I've read it multiple times--have you?--Wall Street Journal, "How Carbon Dioxide Became a Pollutant," April 18, 2008.
§7521 is called "Emission standards for new motor vehicles or new motor vehicle engines."
Oh, wait... I guess if your nickname is motor-mouth, you could get confused. ;-)
In summary, let's keep it honest and leave the exaggeration and misrepresentation to the libs, please.
BTW, when the EPA released its SCOTUS-mandated findings, they also included methane. Why did you single out carbon dioxide?