I didn’t see this segment, so thanks for posting this. After so many actual experts (as opposed to armchair guessers) saying this was a missile, I’m convinced that’s what it was. The only question remaining is, whose missile was it?
I didn’t see this segment, so thanks for posting this. After so many actual experts (as opposed to armchair guessers) saying this was a missile, I’m convinced that’s what it was. The only question remaining is, whose missile was it?
I had not seen it also. You are welcome. Did you notice that the insults are beginning already?
I saw the contrail photos and to my eyes there is no comparison.
1) No smoke spewing out of the back of the missile.
2) No tell tale corkscrew smoke plume typical of a missile and a missile only.
3) No bright red “fire” to be seen in the video excerpt coming out of the back of the rocket as it speeds away from us at a 45 degree angle heading North (North Pacific? North China?)
I tire
The list goes on and on. I can’t make these contrail truthers see if they will not see.
But
It is not a flat thin contrail passing over our heads in LA, going to AZ.
It is a missile launch, moving up and away from us, (not an “optical illusion”), and it is just like the ones many have seen many times from Pt. Mugu and Vandenberg ...
Listen to the interview and the video.
The man is very serious, very sure of his opinion, says “Ask any Navy or Air Force squadron anywhere in the world and they will agree with me: it is a sub based ICBM launch”.
Thomas G. McInerney, three star General: 4,100 flying hours. 407 combat missions.
Go on and insult him, contrail crazies ...
I didn’t see this segment, so thanks for posting this. After so many actual experts (as opposed to armchair guessers) saying this was a missile, I’m convinced that’s what it was.
The only question remaining is, whose missile was it?
I had not seen it also. You are welcome. Did you notice that the insults are beginning already?
I saw the contrail photos and to my eyes there is no comparison.
1) No smoke spewing out of the back of the missile.
2) No tell tale corkscrew smoke plume typical of a missile and a missile only.
3) No bright red “fire” to be seen in the video excerpt coming out of the back of the rocket as it speeds away from us at a 45 degree angle heading North (North Pacific? North China?)
I tire
The list goes on and on. I can’t make these contrail truthers see if they will not see.
But
It is not a flat thin contrail passing over our heads in LA, going to AZ.
It is a missile launch, moving up and away from us, (not an “optical illusion”), and it is just like the ones many have seen many times from Pt. Mugu and Vandenberg ...
Listen to the interview and the video.
The man is very serious, very sure of his opinion, says “Ask any Navy or Air Force squadron anywhere in the world and they will agree with me: it is a sub based ICBM launch”.
Thomas G. McInerney, three star General: 4,100 flying hours. 407 combat missions.
Go on and insult him, contrail crazies ...
I agree. It was a missile. I’ve seen missiles launched and plane contrails.
The difference is obvious and if it were a plane they would know what plane it was. IMO