Of course, this should apply to all NGOs. None should get funding of any sort from the taxpayer.
Simplified for argument:
Proposal A - The govt taxes the people $100M, spends $100M to feed 1000 poor people for a year
Proposal B - The govt taxes the people $10M, gives church $10M, church feeds 10,000 poor people for a year
It's obvious to me that the taxpayer is better served contracting with the charity as the social service provider.
Of course, I prefer:
Proposal C - The govt taxes the people $0, doesn't fund social services at all, leaving it to the charities who do it best. Local communities and individuals, relieved of part of their tax burden, efficiently allocate their giving to the greatest needs.
If it isn’t for the purpose of maintaining government, then the government shouldn’t be using confiscated tax dollars from the taxpayer for it.
We should be paying taxes only for maintaining the small government entity as prescribed by the founding fathers in our Constitution.
Congress should be meeting only as needed, NOT year round sitting and creating laws, and ways to spend our money. That is NOT their purpose.
None should get funding of any sort from the taxpayer.
Some NGOs naturally do a better job than a government agency could. A church probably feeds the poor a lot better, and with a lot less waste and fraud, than food stamps.