And the brigade's Latin Outreach unit.
Posted on 11/18/2010 10:10:08 AM PST by My Favorite Headache
The liberal Center for American Progress doesn’t believe significant GOP gains in the House and Senate should stop the President from implementing more of his polices. The group released a report Tuesday suggesting ways Obama can bypass Congress to accomplish a progressive agenda, and it cites the president’s power as commander-in-chief to make its point.
“I think most of the conversation since the election has been about how President Obama adjusts to the new situation on Capitol Hill,” Center for American Progress head and former Bill Clinton Chief of Staff John Podesta told the Daily Caller. “While that’s an important conversation, it simply ignores the president’s ability to use all levels of his power and authority to move the country forward.”
How does one “move the country forward”? In the center’s report, Podesta explains that Obama can use executive orders, rulemaking, and even the armed forces “to accomplish important change” and that such means “should not be underestimated.”
What exactly does Podesta think the president should use such powers to “accomplish”? Among others, the report suggests “job creation,“ ”quality affordable health care,“ ”sustainable security,“ and ”a clean energy future.”
The report cites specific goals such as mitigating the effects of the military’s “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy, supporting a Palestinian state, and reducing greenhouse gasses by 17 percent by 2020.
“The U.S. Constitution and the laws of our nation grant the president significant authority to make and implement policy,” Podesta writes. ”Congressional gridlock does not mean the federal government stands still.”
Statement from John D. Podesta November 15, 2010
In the aftermath of this month’s midterm congressional elections, pundits and politicians across the ideological spectrum are focusing on how difficult it will be for President Barack Obama to advance his policy priorities through Congress. Predictions of stalemate abound. And some debate whether the administration should tack to the left or to the center and compromise with or confront the new House leadership.
As a former White House chief of staff, I believe those to be the wrong preoccupations. President Obama’s ability to govern the country as chief executive presents an opportunity to demonstrate strength, resolve, and a capacity to get things done on a host of pressing challenges of importance to the public and our economy. Progress, not positioning, is what the public wants and deserves.
The U.S. Constitution and the laws of our nation grant the president significant authority to make and implement policy. These authorities can be used to ensure positive progress on many of the key issues facing the country through:
* Executive orders * Rulemaking * Agency management * Convening and creating public-private partnerships * Commanding the armed forces * Diplomacy
The ability of President Obama to accomplish important change through these powers should not be underestimated. President Bush, for example, faced a divided Congress throughout most of his term in office, yet few can doubt his ability to craft a unique and deeply conservative agenda using every aspect of the policymaking apparatus at his disposal. And, after his party lost control of Congress in 1994, President Clinton used executive authority and convening power to make significant progressive change. For instance, he protected more great spaces in the lower 48 states than any president since Theodore Roosevelt, established for the first time significant protections for Americans’ medical privacy, and urged the creation of the Welfare-to-Work Partnership that enlisted the help of 20,000 businesses in moving more than 1 million welfare recipients into the workforce.
The upshot: Congressional gridlock does not mean the federal government stands still. This administration has a similar opportunity to use available executive authorities while also working with Congress where possible. At the Center for American Progress, we look forward to our nation continuing to make progress.
Read the full report (pdf)
Download the executive summary (pdf)
Download the report to e-readers and mobile devices from Scribd
To speak with our experts on this topic, please contact:
Print: Megan Smith (health care, education, economic policy) 202.741.6346 or msmith@americanprogress.org
Print: Anna Soellner (foreign policy and security, energy) asoellner@americanprogress.org
Print: Raúl Arce-Contreras (ethnic media, immigration) 202.478.5318 or rarcecontreras@americanprogress.org
Radio: Laura Pereyra 202.741.6258 or lpereyra@americanprogress.org
TV: Andrea Purse 202.741.6250 or apurse@americanprogress.org
Web: Erin Lindsay 202.741.6397 or elindsay@americanprogress.org http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2010/11/executive_orders.html/#statement
I keep telling people the same thing. They say.....oh no they won’t!
When it comes push to shove I think most will just follow orders.
And the brigade's Latin Outreach unit.
Read in context w my first sentence, I meant the military should not be bothered with activists’ desire to have homosexuals be able to proclaim their sexual habits openly in the ranks. Their “need” to do so, in my opinion, is totally contrived.
“Americans are not horses, we were not born to have saddles placed on our backs, by anyone, at any time, and for any reason….”-Mike Pence
I’ve liked this guy for a long time.
Remember a few years ago when he headed the “sit-in” in Congress, where the republicans stayed while the democrats grabbed their suitcases and water-wings and ran out the door for “vacation” before some vote? (was it on amnesty?)
This guy’s got a spine.
Today on the WTAM news, they reported a story that “Arizona boycott cost state some millions of dollars”, and attributed it to the Center for American Progress.
I called the newsroom & asked if they were going to start using the Communist Party USA as a source. Intern couldn't have cared less.
FWIW
Why we have the TEA party here in the States and a Tea Party is growing in Great Britain.
Make that our gay volunteer military.
Then keep it between your selves if it's inter-service rivalry.
A. Oh, poor baby. Are your tender sensibilities so easily offended?
B. This is all you have to contribute to this thread? Really . . . why bother if this is all you bring to the table.
Ping
How does one “move the country forward”? In the center’s report, Podesta explains that Obama can use executive orders, rulemaking, and even the armed forces “to accomplish important change” and that such means “should not be underestimated.”
Most of the gays I know have no interest in joining the military and do not have the self discipline or motivation to endure basic, let alone something like AIT.Those that do and they exist as proven by DADT, I say let them serve as they serve today.
“Never forget the video from the guy who infiltrated the Weather Underground...”
Does anyone have a link?
Podesta has done us a great service, by declaring himself an enemy of the American people!
Great. Now, at best, all national guards will become ‘meals on wheels’ brigades, delivering freebies to a swelling mass of welfare recipients throughout the 57 states.
Does anyone care (other than a handful of us on the right)?
Anyone at all?
:(:(:(:(:(
Wow, you really are an ass, aren’t you?
You can have the last word, Ron. No need to respond. Now go get bent.
Sounds like Nazis Germany, Soviet Union, Maoist China, Khmer Rouge, Baathist Iraq, etc.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.