Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lawrence O’Donnell: Sarah Palin is ruining the English language (Much ado about 'refudiate')
Hotair ^ | 11/18/2010 | Cubachi

Posted on 11/18/2010 12:30:47 PM PST by WebFocus

If there is something we learned this year, it’s that anything Palin tweets or writes on Facebook becomes international news and the talk of the nation, especially when it comes to politics.

Two nights ago on his program, Lawrence O’Donnell decided to rant on New Oxford American Dictionary for their decision to include Sarah Palin’s word “refudiate” into the English language.

Palin’s typo in a tweet about the Ground Zero mosque was the talk on twitter. Palin called it “Shakespearean.” The result: she popularized the word and it is now part of the lexicon.

New Oxford wrote about their decision:

An unquestionable buzzmaker in 2010, the word refudiate instantly evokes the name of Sarah Palin, who tweeted her way into a flurry of media activity when she used the word in certain statements posted on Twitter. Critics pounced on Palin, lampooning what they saw as nonsensical vocabulary and speculating on whether she meant “refute” or “repudiate.”

From a strictly lexical interpretation of the different contexts in which Palin has used “refudiate,” we have concluded that neither “refute” nor “repudiate” seems consistently precise, and that “refudiate” more or less stands on its own, suggesting a general sense of “reject.”

Lawrence O’Donnell got wee-wee’d up with the decision, and lashed out against the dictionary for allowing Sarah Palin to ruin the English language, or something. He is also annoyed that for a woman, who he claims will not run for president, gets this much attention. Then why talk about her if she is so irrelevant?

“No doubt Sarah Palin and her supporters will take this honor and run with it; next they will be demanding that cartographers actually move Russia even closer to Sarah Palin house.”



TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: english; lawrenceodonnell; refudiate; sarahpalin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last
To: WebFocus

Nonsense is what O’Donnell is about.


41 posted on 11/18/2010 1:02:04 PM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

New Oxford American Dictionary submission:

Lawrence O’Donnell (verb): The state of incurring severe explosive diarrhea after eating very spicy beans and drinking copious amounts of beer.

Synonym phrases: the runs, taking a loose dump.

An example:

Nobody light matches ! I just ate two plates of baked chili beans and drank ten cans of beer and I have to take a Lawrence O'Donnell ! Grampa, outta my way and quit with the, 'Pull my finger jokes' because this is no laughing matter !


42 posted on 11/18/2010 1:02:44 PM PST by pyx (Rule#1.The LEFT lies.Rule#2.See Rule#1. IF THE LEFT CONTROLS THE LANGUAGE, IT CONTROLS THE ARGUMENT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WebFocus

This self admitted communist deserves the worst life offers... and his words are as evil as those of the devil himself.

LLS


43 posted on 11/18/2010 1:07:54 PM PST by LibLieSlayer (WOLVERINES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WebFocus
Where was OD when The One said corpse for corps? Where was he when The One said we have 57 states? --Oh sheesh! I forgot! We re ONLY talking about Safah.

vaudine

44 posted on 11/18/2010 1:12:39 PM PST by vaudine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB

JFK used to call Cuba “ Cuber”....the media thought it was quaint!!!


45 posted on 11/18/2010 1:15:02 PM PST by ontap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: WebFocus
Lawrence O’Donnell: Sarah Palin is ruining the English language

Lawrence O'Donnell, the guy who proudly proclaims himself not a liberal, but a Socialist?

Pardon me if I fail to give a f*** what he has to say, except maybe if his commentary is along the lines of "Yes, sir, I would like to book that one way. Yes. To Russia. Yes sir. No, just me."

46 posted on 11/18/2010 1:21:22 PM PST by Lazamataz (Pelosi: Like a rapist, PROUD of their handiwork.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WebFocus

If O’Donnell is miffed at Palin, he should be absolutely furious at Jesse Jackson. To this day, I’ve yet to understand a complete sentence that’s come out of that guy’s mouth.


47 posted on 11/18/2010 1:27:06 PM PST by reagan_fanatic (Scratch a “progressive” and a fascist bleeds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WebFocus

looks like an accidental merger of two words:

- repudiate: to formally separate from; to reject
- refute: to prove wrong by argument or evidence

I think both of these were accomplished with this election. So I propose adding this word to the dictionary so it will live in history. Let’s just start using the “word” proudly and make a few liberal heads explode.


48 posted on 11/18/2010 1:30:14 PM PST by RatRipper (I'll ride a turtle to work every day before I buy anything from Government Motors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000
So who the hell can we pin the blame on for such American english gems such as:

Sho' nuff


49 posted on 11/18/2010 1:35:21 PM PST by pepperhead (Kennedys float, Mary Jos don't)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: WebFocus

O’Donnell off his meds again...

Lawrence O’Donnell Rages On Bush Speechwriter Marc Thiessen: ‘Your Administration Invited The First Attack’

“Isn’t it true that the president you worked for invited the first attack by having no idea what was going on with al Qaeda? You just admitted that when you were hit on 9/11, you just said, ‘We didn’t know who hit us’. You were told who was going to hit you before 9/11. And your administration invited the first attack, for which you should live in shame.”

******

11-6-10

Lawrence O’Donnell Calls Himself A Socialist

I am not a progressive. I am not a liberal who is so afraid of the word that I had to change my name to progressive. Liberals amuse me. I am a socialist. I live to the extreme left, the extreme left of you mere liberals


50 posted on 11/18/2010 1:37:55 PM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reagan_fanatic

RE: he should be absolutely furious at Jesse Jackson. To this day, I’ve yet to understand a complete sentence that’s come out of that guy’s mouth


“STAY OUT DA BUSHES !”


51 posted on 11/18/2010 1:38:08 PM PST by WebFocus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: WebFocus

I suppose O’Donnell has nothing to say about the Nittaly Lions...?


52 posted on 11/18/2010 1:38:52 PM PST by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RatRipper

RE: Let’s just start using the “word” proudly and make a few liberal heads explode.


Rush Limbaugh has been using the word : STRATEGERY for the longest time.

And as for Dubya, he now proudly uses the word “mis-underestimate”.

I kinda like the sound of the latter.


53 posted on 11/18/2010 1:40:29 PM PST by WebFocus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: WebFocus

Since when does a socialist, the author of our current public schhoos and Ebonics, care about proper English.


54 posted on 11/18/2010 2:13:22 PM PST by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WebFocus

OK Larry what about whole language, invented spelling and ebonics?


55 posted on 11/18/2010 2:25:18 PM PST by ari-freedom (Islam is at war against America, while America is at the mall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WebFocus

“The problem with defending the purity of the English language is that English is about as pure as a cribhouse whore. We don’t just borrow words; on occasion, English has pursued other languages down alleyways to beat them unconscious and rifle their pockets for new vocabulary.” James D. Nicoll


56 posted on 11/18/2010 3:31:15 PM PST by Pete from Shawnee Mission
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson