Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mad Hatter: Miami Congresswoman Angry Over House Hat Ban (Florida Democrat Alert)
NBC Miami ^ | 11/18/10 | Todd Wright

Posted on 11/19/2010 6:37:25 AM PST by Recovering_Democrat

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 last
To: celtic gal

You are corrct, CelticGal. Ladies are not required to remove their hats indoors. There are a few exceptions: Ladies SHOULD remove their hats while entertaining in their own homes. At sporting events where the National Anthem is played, ladies wearing casual headgear (like a baseball cap) SHOULD remove said headgear, but those who are wearing more formal ones (such as the hats that Lucy and Ethel wore all the time) do NOT get removed. If you watch the Kentucky Derby on TV, you’ll see that the ladies wearing formal hats do not remove them, but those wearing caps do.

Hats or veils used to be an absolute essential for church services (I still wear a veil myself), and when I was a little girl, there were still lots of women who always wore hats in public (indoors or out).

I have no idea why there is a rule about hats in the Florida legislature (the link wasn’t working), but I suspect it was written before women were an everyday fixture on the Floor. That’s my guess, anyway.

Regards,


81 posted on 11/19/2010 8:19:24 AM PST by VermiciousKnid (Sic narro nos totus!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: alexander_busek

Hats have absolutely been around a lot longer than the Industrial Revolution. My knowledge of them prior to that period is admittedly hazy. My understanding of them and their purpose generally revolves around the soot/ash discussion, but I do understand that they serve many more purposes.


82 posted on 11/19/2010 8:20:26 AM PST by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Doctor 2Brains

With a GOP House, conviction of a felony would lead to expulsion.


83 posted on 11/19/2010 8:46:25 AM PST by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: bonehead4freedom
one round lens and one square lens
84 posted on 11/19/2010 9:02:16 AM PST by shooter223 (the government should fear the citizens......not the other way around)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Rockingham

You have more faith in the GOP than I. Then again, having more faith in the GOP than I, is a pretty low threshold. :)


85 posted on 11/19/2010 9:02:42 AM PST by Doctor 2Brains (If the government were Paris Hilton, it could not score a free drink in a bar full of lonely sailors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name; xzins; wagglebee
She takes it off when the rules apply. Not to difficult to do or ask to be done.

And do you fault her for wanting to change the rules? When the rule was instituted, there were no women congressmen. It was a rule that applied only to men.

The tradition of women wearing hats indoors goes back to Biblical times. It is a sign of modesty (believe it or not) and the fact that this woman wants to change a rule so that women can be more like women, should encourage "conservatives" rather than ruffle their feathers.

I say more power to her on this issue. This is a fashion issue and not a political one. Cut her some slack. I personally admire her individuality although I detest her politics.

86 posted on 11/19/2010 9:16:51 AM PST by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

Enough already! Take your campaign for the mad hatter someone else. Geez - give it a rest.


87 posted on 11/19/2010 9:20:48 AM PST by presently no screen name ("Thus you nullify the word of God by your tradition that you have handed down.." Mark 7:13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name; xzins
Enough already! Take your campaign for the mad hatter someone else. Geez - give it a rest.

You responded to my posts. I have just returned the favor. I was just being courteous.

You are free to leave the thread. I'm staying.

I'm here to support the rebellion against the fashion fascists.

Don't touch my junk! <[:-)

88 posted on 11/19/2010 9:30:35 AM PST by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Doctor 2Brains

It is not a question of faith but of political calculation. After the Dems slammed Rangel, the GOP would be hard put not to hammer anyone else for more serious misconduct.


89 posted on 11/19/2010 10:18:18 AM PST by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

I like her hat, and wonder if a rule against hats in the house is really a left-over sexist rule when it was all men.


90 posted on 11/19/2010 10:33:48 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oberon

Women can wear hats indoors. At least to church. Which is indoors.


91 posted on 11/19/2010 10:34:37 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Oberon
Hat Etiquette:
"Ladies properly keep their hats on indoors, everywhere except their own houses, during the day," she writes. "Luncheons even traditionally required ladies to wear hats."

Miss Manners recognizes that some rules vary peculiarly. It is acceptable for Christian women to wear hats in church, but disrespectful for men to wear them. Not so with Conservative or Orthodox Jews, who would find it disrespectful for men not to cover their heads with a yarmulke when in a synagogue.


92 posted on 11/19/2010 10:36:51 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PeterPrinciple
Hats Banned in 1837:
On this day in 1837, the House adopted a rule barring members from wearing hats on the floor. This reversed a custom forged during Congress’s formative years, when representatives routinely donned hats during debates.
The article doesn't give much of an explanation for why, but it was a short, interesting read on the subject.

According to the article, it seems the speaker can "give leave" to a member to wear a hat.

93 posted on 11/19/2010 10:42:52 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

LOL!!!!

“Don’t Touch My Junk!!!”


94 posted on 11/19/2010 10:47:55 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe; blue-duncan
Don't touch my junk! <[:-)

Rotflol!

95 posted on 11/19/2010 11:18:45 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain & proud of it: Truly Supporting the Troops means praying for their Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

All right, all right! I stand corrected, everyone! Etiquette does not require that ladies remove their hats when indoors!


96 posted on 11/19/2010 11:35:12 AM PST by Oberon (Big Brutha Be Watchin'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT; xzins
Hats Banned in 1837:

From your article:

Other lawmakers stressed the symbolic value of hats, noting that British parliamentarians donned top hats to show their independence from royalty. Rep. John Patton of Virginia said, “Whenever, if ever, our executive magistrates shall attempt to employ any improper influence on this body, let us be found with our hats on.”

97 posted on 11/19/2010 11:54:22 AM PST by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: shooter223

Awesome! Thanks, do you have one with the hat & glasses too!


98 posted on 11/19/2010 2:28:45 PM PST by bonehead4freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson