Not This Mitt Again (Mitt Romney hasn't changed a bit)

pajamasmedia ^ | Monday November 22, 2010 | Tom Blumer

[Artemis Webb]

"And it won’t be Mitt."

Denial of a legitimate problem isn't wise. Countless FReepers (including myself) said that McCain wouldn't be the nominee in 2008 and that's exactly what we got.

[sport]

I did not mean he would not be the nominee. I meant that he won’t win the election. obamaill beat him worse than he would have Mc Cain without Sarah. I know I won’t vote for him [Mitt]

[Artemis Webb]

Agreed.

[Colofornian]

Apparently Professor Gee won’t let the lack of real evidence of a “concerted anti-Romney strategy” based on Mormonism get in the way of a historically revisionist fable.

This BYU professor (Gee) was actually surprised that Romney was presented as a flip-flopper.

Either that's willful ignorance or he doesn't know how to study history chronologically.

As for how Mitt's religion would figure into White House policy...
Foreign policy: Hey...true believing Mormons think 75-80% of the Republican base -- which is Christian -- are "apostates." If he can't even figure out what a world religion faith like Christianity is in his own country, how's he going to screw up trying to pinpoint Islam?

Abortion:
Mitt's been thoroughly pro-abortion during his political career. I mean, hey, his general authority religious leaders have told their faithful that if they pray about abortion and the Mormon god says, "yes" then go for it. They also told their faithful that if a medical authority (read "abortionist") says it's "OK," then it's "OK."

[driftdiver]

“Hey...true believing Mormons think 75-80% of the Republican base — which is Christian — are “apostates.”

Thats ok, we think they are members of a cult who desperately need to accept the salvation of Christ.

I’d rather have a mormon president than a muslim president.

Romney is a RINO and would make a very bad president.