Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Swedish doctor assaulted 'for being a man'
www.thelocal.se ^ | 11/19/2010 | TT/The Local/pvs

Posted on 11/22/2010 1:43:53 PM PST by WesternCulture

A doctor at Örebro University Hospital in central Sweden was attacked and kicked recently by the relatives of a critical ill woman who had just given birth, because they objected to him being a male.

"He was attacked by the husband and received a kick to the groin," said René Bangshöj at the hospital to the local Nerikes Allehanda (NA) daily.

The incident occurred on November 6th when the doctor entered the delivery room at the maternity ward at the hospital responding to a call from the woman's attendant midwife. She had recently given birth and was bleeding heavily.

The woman's husband screamed at the doctor that he should leave the room at once, but he refused and approached the patient to examine her. At this point he was attacked by the man.

The husband's brother joined in the melee, attacking the doctor from behind, according to the newspaper.

The matter was reported to the police who escorted the woman's relatives from the premises. The woman was then taken in for an operation to address the bleeding.

The doctor continues to work at the clinic and the hospital has stated that it plans to clarify its position that staff can not be selected according to their gender.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: crime; healthcare; orebro; sweden
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last
To: Owl_Eagle

Paki Rage Boy! What a star!


21 posted on 11/22/2010 2:12:26 PM PST by ccmay (Too much Law; not enough Order.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: steve8714
ROP?

Judging by the replies, I would say yes.......looks like da swedes are getting fed up with the Islamists too..........LOL!

22 posted on 11/22/2010 2:17:44 PM PST by Hot Tabasco (There's only one cure for Obamarrhea......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: WesternCulture

Way to go Doc! I mean it’s not like they threw a shoe at you or anything. Now the poor woman is going to have to be stoned to death for disseminating her hoohoo. Not only that, but if the baby was a girl, she’s gonna need a little sumpthin’ sumpthin’ to restore her honor also. I get that Muslim hoohoos are a special thing, but seriously, What’s up with a guy watching his sister give birth?


23 posted on 11/22/2010 2:22:15 PM PST by davius (You can roll manure in powdered sugar but that don't make it a jelly doughnut.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WesternCulture

Let me guess: this is a story about moose limbs.


24 posted on 11/22/2010 2:29:02 PM PST by Notwithstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: epithermal

A flash mob with everyone carrying blow dart guns.


25 posted on 11/22/2010 2:55:22 PM PST by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

No, I want to create a single, oozing red dot exactly 7.62mm in diameter in the center of his single eyebrow.

i would rather it be .45 or .50


26 posted on 11/22/2010 3:09:52 PM PST by 1st Division guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

“I wanted the pink mist.”


27 posted on 11/22/2010 3:18:22 PM PST by CholeraJoe ("Want me to shoot out the light, ma'am?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: WesternCulture
Gee, I didn't realize the Swedes were so rabidly feminazi and anti-man. /s Sigh, the article carefully mentions nothing that might have precipitated the assault except the obvious (can't risk making the assailants any angrier, I guess) - that their 'cultural' differences led to the attack. Sigh again. No motive, no reason, and best of all, no apology, like, hey, thanks for saving the mother of my child by getting her examined and into surgery.

The doctor continues to work at the clinic

This is just the best part (with sarcasm). Hello! - was there any doubt that he shouldn't? There shouldn't be...

28 posted on 11/22/2010 3:56:51 PM PST by fortunecookie (Please pray for Anna, age 7, who waits for a new kidney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

Same reaction here.


29 posted on 11/22/2010 3:57:56 PM PST by meatloaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SeeSac

Not for 7.62 x 51 Nato, which is identical to .308 Winchester, save for there being a thicker base in the military Nato rounds using Berdan primers, with overall case dimension and length being the same between those two.

30-'06 Springfield also utilizes 7.62mm or .308 nominal diameter projectiles, which isn't surprising in that it is something of the "parent" round, that the .308 or 7.62 Nato was derived from.
Look at the dimensional attributes in a bullet or powder reloading manual. The .308 is simply shorter, 51 mm standard overall cartridge length, as opposed to 64mm for the Springfield. Other case dimensions are much the same, same angle of shoulder, same taper, etc.

.303 Brit ain't .303 bullet diameter, though... More like .311 if memory serves...
Leave it to the British to come up with such a system --- one that uses case length, 3.03 INCHES, instead of chiefly referring to bullet diameter, like most everyone else, as the major component of the assigned nomenclature.

The .311 bullets can possibly be loaded into 7.62x54R cases in some instances, and work better than actual 7.62 or .308 nominal diameter projectiles (which are an inherently sloppy fit for such rifles, regardless of the "name", as the bores of 54R rifles can measure .312 or bigger) but then again in a few versions it could be .001 oversize in some of the many versions of 7.62x54R rifles which just might measure .310, so due caution must be observed.

In other words, if it blows up in one's face, or BLOWS UP one's face, don't anyone who reads this come crying to me just cuz 'ya didn't break out a USE a micrometer and carefully measure actual bore dimensions before trying it.

http://www.militaryfactory.com/smallarms/ballistics-chart.asp

7.92 is the bullet diameter of the 8x57 Mauser, which the Krauts used in their K 98 carbines, and some other weapons.

30 posted on 11/22/2010 4:21:14 PM PST by BlueDragon (....other than that we aint nothin' just good 'ol boys...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: WesternCulture

They have Amish in Sweden?


31 posted on 11/22/2010 5:35:05 PM PST by Some Fat Guy in L.A. (Wanna learn humility? Become a Pittsburgh Pirates fan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlueDragon
Not for 7.62 x 51 Nato, which is identical to .308 Winchester

Still not 7.62.

7.92 is the bullet diameter of the 8x57 Mauser, which the Krauts used in their K 98 carbines, and some other weapons.

I believe that the K's (circa 1935) were .323 (8.2 mm).

32 posted on 11/23/2010 5:58:00 AM PST by SeeSac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: SeeSac
Read the info at the link. It is only one source of a great many available on the subject. Or try referencing a reloading manual, for those are much better, much more precise than internet opinions. ??? Actually, the rounds I mentioned as to measuring such, actually DO.
33 posted on 11/23/2010 9:01:25 AM PST by BlueDragon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: BlueDragon

1. NONE of the bullets in your link have a 7.62 diameter. Thank you.

2. You referenced the 8x57 Mauser. It is not listed on your link.


34 posted on 11/23/2010 9:17:53 AM PST by SeeSac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: SeeSac

Obviously, you cannot READ. Try again.


35 posted on 11/23/2010 9:40:29 AM PST by BlueDragon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: BlueDragon
1. NONE of the bullets in your link have a 7.62 diameter. Thank you.

2. You referenced the 8x57 Mauser. It is not listed on your link.

Obviously, you cannot READ. Try again.

I did. Same results.

36 posted on 11/23/2010 9:48:24 AM PST by SeeSac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: SeeSac

1 That's because they are being expressed in INCH size, YOU MORON!

So why don't you go through the metric to inch scale conversion, then find yourself a diagram showing true cartridge dimensions of .308, and 30-'06 to cure your ignorance? They both utilize 7.62 mm projectiles, which is .308 of an inch.

What's that you say? You want me to do it FOR you?

Ok, I could do that. But if I do, will you acknowledge you are speaking out of turn? Or not? I suspect you'll keep arguing things you really know nothing about...

The 8x57 is there alright, you just know know enough about armament to see it, since it is not expressed directly as such, as it's listed as "7.92 x 57", having a bullet diameter of 7.92 mm, which equals .323 of an inch.

Now, I said that [what is most commonly called] 8mm Mauser, or alternatively 8 x 57 Mauser uses in actuality a 7.92 mm projectile or bullet, didn't I? Yet somehow you are such the argumentative sort, you persist in telling me I'm wrong?

Just admit it. You don't have any hands-on experience with the things you are talking about. I, on the other hand, do.

37 posted on 11/23/2010 12:52:13 PM PST by BlueDragon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: BlueDragon
1 That's because they are being expressed in INCH size, YOU MORON! So why don't you go through the metric to inch scale conversion, then find yourself a diagram showing true cartridge dimensions of .308, and 30-'06 to cure your ignorance? They both utilize 7.62 mm projectiles, which is .308 of an inch.

Uh, 7.62mm = 0.300" NOT .308"

38 posted on 11/23/2010 1:04:38 PM PST by SeeSac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: BlueDragon
The 8x57 is there alright, you just know know enough about armament to see it, since it is not expressed directly as such, as it's listed as "7.92 x 57", having a bullet diameter of 7.92 mm, which equals .323 of an inch.

The I is .318, the IS is .323

Just admit it. You don't have any hands-on experience with the things you are talking about. I, on the other hand, do.

Your mixing up bullet sizes could be dangerous.

39 posted on 11/23/2010 1:12:21 PM PST by SeeSac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: SeeSac

Have you ever examined a single reloading manual in your life?


40 posted on 11/23/2010 1:13:28 PM PST by BlueDragon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson