Yeah thats right there have been at least three different versions of the 1611. Lets be aware of one important facts the "translators can say what ever they like, but it has been documented that significant portions of the King Jimmy have been lifted directly from the D/R.
***Which King Jimmy 1611 version? The one that contained the Cuetrocanicals in there proper place, the one that put them in the middle section between the testaments, or the one that completley removed it. ***
If book placement is important to you then you should go back to the HEBREW texts and see that many of the OT books are in a different placment compared to all Christian bibles.
And there are no Apocrypha “C”utrocanicals in the Hebrew texts that I know of.
As for the DR, there is no proof that the translators stole from it as they said they had not seen the complete work (DR) yet. They did compare their translation with the Hebrew, Caldee, Greek and Latin texts as they say on the opening page.
“Lets be aware of one important facts the “translators can say what ever they like, but it has been documented that significant portions of the King Jimmy have been lifted directly from the D/R. “
You have it backwards...
All of them are God's perfect words in English.
The Apocrypha wasn't considered canonical so it was removed due to printing costs.