That's right. I say this all the time, but the reasons for not allowing homosexuals to serve openly really has nothing to do with the depravity of the personal sexual endeavors. The reason is segregation - IOW, we will now lose entirely the ability to segregate people from each other who are predisposed to engage in sexual contact.
Why is that bad? It's bad because sexual relations between two adults - even if consensual - forever changes the relationship dynamic. We will have people that will die, and missions that won't get accomplished solely because two "bitches" are involved in a lover's spat. It's that simple.
For this reason, and only this reason, is it worth risking our own national security to placate the desires of an tiny fraction of society. I think the answer is plainly, NO.
Good point.
It will only become natural for the homosexuals to hang out together outside of work, which will then lead to relationships and cliques based on a sex act.
My son is in the infantry, lives in the barracks, he and his buddies are together 24/7, there is no added dynamics of a sexual relationship. There is absolutely NO WAY relationships will be avoided!!!!