Posted on 12/01/2010 5:34:51 AM PST by Bob Hyneman
Saving this from the memory hole
Taliban in Afghanistan says they will target informants outed by WikiLeaks for working with U.S.
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/2010/07/30/2010-07-30_taliban_in_afghanistan_says_they_will_target_informants_outed_by_wikileaks_for_w.html#ixzz16oQw97CV
Taliban seeks vengeance on Afghans named in WikiLeaks documents
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/international/taliban_seeks_vengeance_on_afghans_cy9V6VfsOcOW3982DAC44O#ixzz16oR2Jg1i
Taliban Study WikiLeaks to Hunt Informants
http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/07/30/taliban-study-wikileaks-to-hunt-informants/
Leaked War Files Expose Identities of Afghan Informants
http://www.foxnews.com/world/2010/07/27/leaked-afghan-war-files-expose-identities-informants/
Wikileaks Afghanistan: Taliban 'hunting down informants'
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/afghanistan/7917955/Wikileaks-Afghanistan-Taliban-hunting-down-informants.html
That's okay Assange Apologized and quiCkly pulled back the informants names. . . . Oh wait he didn't. In fact he said those who inform on the Taliban were "acting in a criminal way"
The Times revealed that the NAMES, VILLAGES, RELATIVES' NAMES AND EVEN GPS LOCATIONS of Afghans co-operating with Nato forces could be accessed easily from files released by WikiLeaks.
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/world/leaked-details-put-informant-lives-in-danger/story-e6frg6so-1225898206990
and
Publication of Afghan informant details worth the risk: WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange
Julian Assange, the founder of the whistleblowing website, told The Times that he would "deeply regret" any harm caused by the disclosures. But in an extensive interview he defended his actions:
He claimed that many informers in Afghanistan were "acting in a criminal way" by sharing false information with Nato authorities;
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/world/publication-of-afghan-informant-details-worth-the-risk-wikileaks-founder-julian-assange/story-e6frg6so-1225898273552
(Excerpt) Read more at theaustralian.com.au ...
It was released to destroy America.
pRes_ _ent Obama is "on track".
Assange and that little fudgepacking queer Bradley Manning need to be executed, hopefully in a very painful way.
What are we waiting for with this creep? Somebody bust the SOB, toss him in a cell, and throw away the danged key!
who ... ‘informants’, were exposed?
Why not just shoot him? That’s the way most nations deal with this sort of thing. Quick and to the point. However, I think this guy has more to fear from the Russians and Chinese than he does from us. After all he exposed just how lame the US is at protecting classified information and you know that, eventually, the US is going to do something about that. Which means that all those countries sucking down everything on our classified nets might be cut off. If that happens boy will they be pi$$ed.
Taliban kills people without an excuse
Informants are exposed because information was leaked. The information may have been discussed at one meeting where 3 people were present. Therefore, one of those three leaked the info. Somebody is going to get shot in the head. They operate kind of like the mafia. ie “Goodfellows” Joe Peshie gets invited to a meeting and then gets shot in the head.
The real agenda isn’t out there yet
After this, WHO is going to give info to US forces if they cannot guarantee his security?
You know what...WTH are we not blowing all the Taliban to Hades, nope, we pay the SOB’s.
Taliban will kill anyone, it doesn’t matter the leaks. The leaks are just a global stage for them to play off of.
If we could just kill those animals, our guys would be packing up and coming home.
Leave China to get Afghanistan on it’s TRILLION dollar minerals feet and start an economy, they’ve got the mineral rights deal.
Why should our guys pay with blood and use our tax dollars to make a nest for China to occupy— like a Dodo bird?
Let China do that work and become hated. They’re big guys now, no?
http://www.cacianalyst.org/?q=node/4858
Team Obama released this information.
It was released to destroy America.
pRes_ _ent Obama is “on track”.
2 posted on Wednesday, December 01, 2010 7:36:47 AM by Diogenesis
Cabby AZ | December 1, 2010 at 12:45 am | SueK 10:18 PM
I believe that Barky and his master (Soros) gave the OK. How could they not have? Assange made his intentions known well in advance of the release and these wackaloons did nothing? Sorry, but this doesnt pass the smell test.
***************************
I couldnt agree more with that and think that many folks feel the same way. It is all just too fishy. Boy, they think we are a bunch of dumb-bunnies.
WikiLeaks was a BO False Flag Op from the beginning. WikiLeaks trashes President Bush and the repubs in advance of the 2010 election, then trashes HC in advance of the 2012 primary. In hundreds of thousands of Wikileaks, there is no mention of BOs BC, passports, muslim faith etc., how much more obvious that BO is behind WikiLeaks does it need to be?
Manning needs to "escape" from his incarceration and "disappear." Assange needs to "disappear" as well.
That's the way these things used to be handled.
This is why we need to slip in some disinformation.
There should be a “leaked” message that identifies a number of Taliban who are secrectly working with us. Make the story believable. Then the Taliban will kill off guys we have a hard time locating.
Worked for the Germans. Hitler’s intel guys tricked Stalin into executing a number of his top generals just before Germany invaded the USSR.
BTW, I worked for a major aerospace company. There was a competion where the contract was worth tens of billions. We found out that our Program Manager’s secretary was sleeping with a guy from the other team. So a small, secret group created an entire fake proposal, and then let it go across the secretary’s desk. The opponent bought it hook, line, and sinker. We won.
“The opponent bought it hook, line, and sinker. We won.”
darth ,
You sneaky SOB ! I like it.
On FoxNews this morning, Gibbs said we have absolutely nothing to fear from someone with a laptop. In other words, it`s no big deal. Thats how seriously the Obama junta is taking all of this.
That win was the work of one of my mentors who has long since retired.
I will take credit for this one:
My boss called me in and said, “We are competing against The Evil Empire (another behemoth aerospace contractor) for the Bigass Star Wars Contract. I need for you to find out everything you can about their technical approach, price, Program Manager, etc. We are especially interested in which material they will use for their Focal Plane Array”.
So I did a literature search and identified every scientist or engineer that had writted a technical papaer on the subject and especially focal plane arrays. I studied the technical papers to discern their approach. Then I got the Evil Empire phonebook for the appropriate division.
I proceeded to call the office of each scientist/engineer. When the secretary answered, I would ask briskly, “Hey, is Joe (or whatever the guy’s first name was) in?” She normally told me that the guy was in a meeting. I then asked, “Can I meet him over at the Proposal Facility for the Bigass Star Wars Project later?”
Then she told me if he was working on the Proposal or not. I went back and read his tech papers to see what his approach was.
Our proposal team was floored when I told them the competitor’s technical approach and Focal Plane Array material. Our Chief Scientist, Dr. Y. was apoplectic, “But how can you KNOW for sure what material they are proposing?”
I replied, “Dr. Y, you know that PhDs never change their mind after they write their thesis on why one material is superior for focal plane arrays.”
When the debrief came out, every one of my points was affirmed. Of course, our Proposal Team did not listen to anything I told them and we lost.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.