Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ErnstStavroBlofeld

Is there anything even in the conceptual stage to replace the Lancer?

And I just have to assume the B-52 will continue until the year 3,000 or so as a large-scale ordinance deployment platform.


2 posted on 12/01/2010 9:47:02 PM PST by freedumb2003 (FYI: everything I post is IMHO -- YOU JACKWAGON! [no offense -- I just like that word])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: freedumb2003

The B-1R is a proposed replacement for the B-1B, created from the existing aircraft. It would have advanced radar and air to air missiles. It would have a speed of Mach 2.2 but the range of the plane would be cur down.


4 posted on 12/01/2010 9:50:51 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: freedumb2003

Well, we could always put the 31 surviving B-47’s back into service. /sarc>


8 posted on 12/01/2010 10:01:14 PM PST by Nowhere Man (General James Mattoon Scott, where are you when we need you? We need a regime change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: freedumb2003

Why not just open up the old assembly lines for the B-52 and B-1B? I think they are mothballed. It would be relatively cheap as the support structure (including avionics and software) already exist.


16 posted on 12/02/2010 4:25:08 AM PST by rbg81 (When you see Obama, shout: "DO YOUR JOB!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson