Posted on 12/03/2010 10:43:04 AM PST by roses of sharon
# Brown: "I accept the findings of the report and support repeal based on the Secretary’s recommendations" 6 minutes ago via web
# Sen. Scott Brown, R-MA, said in a press release that he supports a repeal of DADT. 7 minutes ago via web
I would like to weigh in on some of this DADT discussion
The U.S. Military had better get ready for implementation of the U.S. Department of State’s Foreign Service Manuals, Foreign Service Regulations, and other official policy bulletins and memorandums being utilized as the “benchmark” from which they are rewritten into the DOD Regulations supporting Gays, Lesbians, Bi and Transgendered employees. Some background for you to investigate.
Obama signed a Presidential declaration starting in 2009 that the month of June is LGBT/Appreciation of Gays, with the same type awareness as Asian Pacific Islanders/Black History/Hispanic Months are recognized by the military.
The US Department of State, under Hillary Clinton’s directives have promoted this “Diversity” by making gay partners eligible to become actual “members of household (MOH)” eligible for Family Member Employment via Human Recourses; the Department of State has rewrote the Foreign Affairs Manuals, along with the Foreign Affairs Regulations, to support this implementation. Under the Secretary of State’s guidance, a man can have a gay lover and even that lover’s children put on their official orders and this is permitted to be supported by the Department of State as “Dependents”, yet someone living a non-gay lifestyle cannot have a live in girlfriend as a Member of Household.
All of this information should be available publically from the Department of State’s Public Affairs Office upon request. Be sure to ask for the Presidential Proclamation, Secretary Hillary’s annual correspondence and Cable Traffic, and Department Notices. Also request the FAMs and FARs allowing gay MOH to be supported by the Department of State either financially or with other privileges normally extended to Family Members.
An angle which I believe should be explored is whether there is an actual financial earmark or line item expenditure authorized for the Secretary of State’s actions, or is this an unfunded expenditure mandated by Hillary and endorsed by the President himself? Are these Social Engineering efforts legal when appropriated funding is being budgeted to give travel allowances, dependent COLA and other pay to support non-spouse “Members of Household” at the Department of State?
His decision doesn’t surprise me. He has proven himself to
be just another Massachusetts liberal in an elephant suit.
Ah, I see the Log Cabin Republicans are back...
when some lefty/Kennedy wins Brown’s seat in ‘12, at least we won’t hafta listen to these crazy threads anymore. People are shocked that no Senator from MA is allowed to be a true conservative?
MA is throroughly wacky from Cape Cod to the Berkshires.
It is the construct they use for their commie propaganda.
It is why they worked for 40 years to own the Judiciary, Academia, Hollywood, and TV broadcasts.
The only thing they missed is talk Radio...because Rush got there first.
No one is pimping Brown for the RNC presidential nominee, ever. But, if people think that we are going to find someone more conservative than Brown who can win in MA, they need to put down the crack pipe.
And, if they would rather then have a Dem instead of Brown, I hope they're willing to cut that nose off their spiteful faces.
Good grief. I just threw up in my mouth a little bit.
No. Scott Brown is a RINO fraud. The GOP will only get better when Republican voters tell TV and Hollywood to get stuffed. Fox-Saudia is no better than the rest. It is all Saudi money at all 6 TV networks.
Boston Herald, Nov. 7, 2012
Vicky Kennedy waved to supporters as she celebrated her victory over Republican John Doe by a 75-25 margin in the U.S. Senate race. Doe, a hardcover conservative, squeaked by incumbent Scott Brown in the primary but lost to the popular Kennedy in “a very blue state”. Kennedy is the widow of
Ted Kennedy, who had the seat for 47 years.
“We’re proud to have a Kennedy back in office,” said
Barney Frank, who won re-election as well by a similar
margin, again defeating Sean Bielat. “What a great state!”
There is no “un-trying” anything with liberal laws. It gets it - you are stuck with it. With homosexuals it is always about them, their lifestyle and their needs.
hardcore that should say
I don't know all the details, but, I read that only 23% of the surveys were filled out and returned.
They sent the survey to people that weren't even in the military, nor had they ever been, such as family of the military.
Most of the returned surveys were from non-combat military and family.
Boil it all down and you have 16% of military, and family of military, mostly non-combat, that think queers will make fine soldiers. In other words, its all Bull squat!
Deck, you are wasting your breath here. Yes, certain types are more offended by the Scott Browns than the Schumers, Leahy’s and Blumenthals.
I know people in CT who spent the autumn complaining about Linda McMahon and they never said a negative word about Blumie. I think it some kind of control-freak complex thing that shrinks cannot treat.
The Wikileaks ‘Gay’ Connection
http://www.defendthefamily.com/pfrc/newsarchives.php?id=7661895
Colonel Ron Ray in his 1993 book Military Necessity and Homosexuality noted
“Even if homosexuals are not ‘turned’ by foreign agents, evidence exists that homosexuals, as a group or subculture, can and do turn against their country simply on account of the nature of homosexuality and its hostile attitude toward the existing moral order. This fact is illustrated by a well known group of preeminent writers, thinkers, artists and high social figures known as Bloomsburys who began to reform English tastes before the second world war. That period, termed modernity, saw the supplanting of the fixed moral norms with another ethos. The key to understanding modernity and Bloomsbury is sodomy: Bloomsburys wanted to ‘live as they wanted to live.’ Along with their homosexuality they developed an amoral, irreligious attitude and were unpatriotic as well. E.M. Forster, a member of the Bloomsbury, was quoted as saying, ‘If I had to choose between betraying my country and betraying my friend, I hope I should have the guts to betray my country‘”…
“Another one of its members, Sir Anthony Blunt, a member of the British Intelligence [and a notorious homosexual], became a traitor and breached security, thereby causing many to die. He regularly passed highly classified information on to a nation which would become the primary foe of the free world: the Soviet Union. He once remarked to an intelligence colleague near the end of World War II, ‘it has given me great pleasure to have been able to turn over the names of every MI-5 officer to the Russians.’”
A concise summary of the problem with inviting homosexuals into highly confidential circles is drawn from the memoirs of Police Commissioner Hans von Tresckow, who headed the equivalent of the Berlin “vice squad” from 1905 to 1919:
“[I]t is not the sense of duty towards one’s fellow-men or the nation that forms the rule of conduct for homosexualists; but in every turn of life and in all their striving they think only of the good or harm they may do to their own clique of friends.”
He is from the militant Gay State. The place where the republic does NOT exist and judges get to thwart the will of the people routinely. to hell with the people in the name of personal sexual orientation choices of less than 3% of our population. And by the way, submit your child to them or be hauled off to jail.
Believe it. The facebook group is just a start. She will be “...urged...” to run. The Kennedy name alone will be a big boon for her. Note that poll puts Brown ahead of her in a poss. ‘12 race. Now, how would a more conservative candidate
do vs. her instead of Brown?
Mass.:
RINO: (seen as) hardcore conservative wingnut wacko right winger
Mass. Dem. hard left progressive (seen as): moderate mainstream sensible candidate
IDIOT!! He is an IDIOT!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.