NO ONE IS GETTING A TAX CUT. This is just posturing to keep taxes where there are right now... exorbitantly high.
The Rats are going on record as saying that NOT raising your taxes is mow a tax cut.
Thank you for pointing out the truth. This is all about a tax increase. It has nothing to do with a tax cut.
Keeping the status-quo is not a tax cut. I am SO sick of this terminology being used (abused) by this lying pile of donkey dung in the White House (or Air Sludge One).
Further, I have no doubts The Steaming One has planned all along to tie extension of the already insanely-long unemployment benefits to the tax issue.
Hello Mr. crack-head in Chief - you gripe and complain about how to “pay for” the “tax cuts”, but you don’t care at all how these further extensions of unemployment benefits would be paid for.
I guess he subscribes to his compatriot in crap’s theory - that every dollar spent on unemployment = $2 to the economy (where did this stupid statement originate? The USSR?
You are correct. No one is getting a tax cut in this bill.
Not poor, middle, rich, or super-rich.
It is a tax increase bill. No one is having their taxes increased.
**** NO ONE IS GETTING A TAX CUT. This is just posturing to keep taxes where there are right now... exorbitantly high. ****
And folks better wake up and look around regarding this inside Beltway nonsense scam. If they really believed in “equal rights” EVERY unemployed and under-employed legal U.S. citizen should be included in this!
Otherwise this is plain DISCRIMINATION. Ronald Reagan would call them in on this, ALL OR NOTHIN! ..just as he did the Soviets and their so called missle deal. FOR ALL or nothin...Watch what happens to this “deal” if the cry for EVERY citizen is included in this.
Thank you! Let's get this language CORRECT, there are NO TAX CUTS.
Obama’s announcement of the deal was, for him, just another opportunity to trash Republicans. If I were one of the Republican leaders who negotiated this deal, I would tell Obama that any negotiation requires mutual respect for the points of view and the constituents of both parties. Since he does not have the common courtesy to make a joint or simultaneous announcement and since he criticizes the good faith of the Republicans, any supposed “deal” is off the table until he acts like an adult and agrees that both parties were acting in the best interest of the people.
I would disagree that the deal is in the best interest of the people. It seems to be in the best interest of the two political parties. The people wind up owing more and paying more in the long run.