Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kristinn

NO ONE IS GETTING A TAX CUT. This is just posturing to keep taxes where there are right now... exorbitantly high.


2 posted on 12/06/2010 9:00:06 AM PST by snowrip (Liberal? You are a socialist idiot with no rational argument.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: snowrip

The Rats are going on record as saying that NOT raising your taxes is mow a tax cut.


4 posted on 12/06/2010 9:02:17 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Islam is the religion of Satan and Mohammed was his minion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: snowrip
The term “tax cut” needs to be dropped in favor of “current tax rate extension”. The Dem/Libtards use the term to try to make the current rates appear as an abnormal aberration that needs to be corrected by increasing them. When we use the same phraseology we allow ourselves to be played.
16 posted on 12/06/2010 9:07:59 AM PST by Tonytitan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: snowrip
“NO ONE IS GETTING A TAX CUT. This is just posturing to keep taxes where there are right now... exorbitantly high.”

Thank you for pointing out the truth. This is all about a tax increase. It has nothing to do with a tax cut.

35 posted on 12/06/2010 9:31:06 AM PST by Gabrial (The Whitehouse Nightmare will continue as long as the Nightmare is in the Whitehouse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: snowrip

Keeping the status-quo is not a tax cut. I am SO sick of this terminology being used (abused) by this lying pile of donkey dung in the White House (or Air Sludge One).

Further, I have no doubts The Steaming One has planned all along to tie extension of the already insanely-long unemployment benefits to the tax issue.

Hello Mr. crack-head in Chief - you gripe and complain about how to “pay for” the “tax cuts”, but you don’t care at all how these further extensions of unemployment benefits would be paid for.

I guess he subscribes to his compatriot in crap’s theory - that every dollar spent on unemployment = $2 to the economy (where did this stupid statement originate? The USSR?


49 posted on 12/06/2010 9:58:56 AM PST by TheBattman (They exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: snowrip

You are correct. No one is getting a tax cut in this bill.

Not poor, middle, rich, or super-rich.

It is a tax increase bill. No one is having their taxes increased.


56 posted on 12/06/2010 10:12:44 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain & proud of it: Truly Supporting the Troops means praying for their Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: snowrip

**** NO ONE IS GETTING A TAX CUT. This is just posturing to keep taxes where there are right now... exorbitantly high. ****

And folks better wake up and look around regarding this inside Beltway nonsense scam. If they really believed in “equal rights” EVERY unemployed and under-employed legal U.S. citizen should be included in this!

Otherwise this is plain DISCRIMINATION. Ronald Reagan would call them in on this, ALL OR NOTHIN! ..just as he did the Soviets and their so called missle deal. FOR ALL or nothin...Watch what happens to this “deal” if the cry for EVERY citizen is included in this.


61 posted on 12/06/2010 10:30:28 AM PST by Varsity Flight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: snowrip
NO ONE IS GETTING A TAX CUT

Thank you! Let's get this language CORRECT, there are NO TAX CUTS.

66 posted on 12/06/2010 11:30:23 AM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: snowrip

Obama’s announcement of the deal was, for him, just another opportunity to trash Republicans. If I were one of the Republican leaders who negotiated this deal, I would tell Obama that any negotiation requires mutual respect for the points of view and the constituents of both parties. Since he does not have the common courtesy to make a joint or simultaneous announcement and since he criticizes the good faith of the Republicans, any supposed “deal” is off the table until he acts like an adult and agrees that both parties were acting in the best interest of the people.

I would disagree that the deal is in the best interest of the people. It seems to be in the best interest of the two political parties. The people wind up owing more and paying more in the long run.


83 posted on 12/06/2010 5:22:08 PM PST by excopconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson