Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Continental guilty over 2000 Concorde crash
News.Yahoo.com ^ | Dec 7th 2010 | AFP

Posted on 12/06/2010 1:14:49 PM PST by ColdOne

PARIS (AFP) - – A French court fined Continental Airlines Monday over the 2000 Concorde crash in which 113 died, but did not jail anyone for the disaster that effectively ended commercial supersonic air travel.

The court found the US airline criminally responsible for the Paris crash, caused by a piece of metal that fell from a Continental DC-10 and later shredded the supersonic jet's tyre, which led to a fire in the fuel tank.

(Excerpt) Read more at sg.news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: airfrance; airlines; con; concorde; continental; france; lawsuit; planecrash; ruling; sst

1 posted on 12/06/2010 1:14:50 PM PST by ColdOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

I fail to see the criminal part of this. Did they even know the part had fallen off? What were they supposed to have done?

Seems like a silly exercise.


2 posted on 12/06/2010 1:21:09 PM PST by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

So, the airport is not responsible for policing the runways?


3 posted on 12/06/2010 1:22:48 PM PST by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Now that France has settled the cause, when will they start flying the Concorde again?


4 posted on 12/06/2010 1:23:26 PM PST by Moonman62 (Half of all Americans are above average.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

“The officials had made design changes to strengthen the supersonic jet’s tyres but not the fuel tanks.”

Looks like they are to blame here!


5 posted on 12/06/2010 1:24:01 PM PST by Cheetahcat (Zero the Wright kind of Racist! We are in a state of War with Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
Now that France has settled the cause, when will they start flying the Concorde again? That is a good question. I thought they mothballed those planes?
6 posted on 12/06/2010 1:30:46 PM PST by ColdOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

Never gonna happen. The Concorde was a white elephant for both Air France and British Airways, heavily subsidized by their governments, who in effect saw the SST as their “space program.” But the financial losses were huge, and both nations were relieved to us the crash in 2000 as an excuse to retire the planes.


7 posted on 12/06/2010 1:37:41 PM PST by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Calvin Locke

“So, the airport is not responsible for policing the runways?”

Apparently NOT. They are French of course, and the French cannot do ANYTHING wrong. Had to be the American flagged airline at fault so they could sue for BIG bucks.


8 posted on 12/06/2010 1:49:44 PM PST by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will, they ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne
Is this some Napoleonic code version of Judge Judy winging it for equity? Criminal convictions for work by a specialist in his field?

I would love to hear the evidence of his negligence or whatever wrong doing.
“Fines” paid to the benefit of another airline.

Assigning degrees of civil liability to parties other than the accused?

Like the big frog Charles de Gaulle said , “How can you govern a country in which there are 246 kinds of cheese”.

9 posted on 12/06/2010 2:01:15 PM PST by kbennkc (For those who have fought for it freedom has a flavor the protected will never know .F Trp 8th Cav)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rockinqsranch

Since they didn’t strengthen the underside of the wings, the French made a policy to inspect the runway immediately before every Concorde takeoff. On the day in question, the airport fire department was having a Sunday picnic and declined to perform the inspection.


10 posted on 12/06/2010 2:13:43 PM PST by aviator (Armored Pest Control)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: aviator

r u series?


11 posted on 12/06/2010 2:26:28 PM PST by tired1 (Federalize the Fed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: aviator

Somebody f***ed up and it was not Con Air or their mechanic !


12 posted on 12/06/2010 2:46:14 PM PST by CORedneck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: aviator; tired1

The crash took place on a Tuesday.


13 posted on 12/06/2010 3:41:12 PM PST by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson