Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Maxine Waters Backs Off Call for Investigation of House Ethics Committee
National Legal & Policy Center ^ | December 9, 2010 | Alana Goodman

Posted on 12/09/2010 2:02:55 PM PST by jazusamo

 

Waters photoRep. Maxine Waters (D-CA) has abandoned her efforts to launch an investigation of the House Ethics Committee, which announced it was indefinitely delaying its trial of the congresswoman in late November. Waters was charged over the summer with helping to steer $12 million in federal bailout funds to OneUnited Bank, a bank in which her husband held a considerable financial stake.

On Tuesday, Waters introduced legislation that would create a bipartisan task force to investigate the trial cancelation, which she claims was halted because the ethics committee had insufficient evidence that she violated congressional rules. But today Waters backed away from this measure, announcing that she wouldn’t be calling it to a vote.

The ethics committee has yet to explain the reason for the abrupt trial postponement, but there are indications it may be related to the conduct of two of the committee’s attorneys, who have since been suspended.

There have also been reports that the committee discovered a series of emails that may contradict some of Waters’ defense, adding to the delay.

“Upon the advice of my colleagues whom I trust and admire, I am not pushing for a vote on this resolution today,” Waters announced on the House floor this afternoon. “In doing so, however, I am requesting that the Committee set the record straight, on its own accord, in a bipartisan manner, with a joint statement signed by the Chair and Ranking Member,...[the] circumstances of the events that led to the discipline of the two attorneys leading the case against me.”

While Waters’ and her fellow Democrats still hold the majority in the House until January 1st, the congresswoman will face a much less friendly Republican-controlled congress if her trial resumes after the New Year.

Since her ethics case began, Waters has mounted an almost theatrical public relations campaign against the ethics committee. The congresswoman and her staff regaled reporters with a lengthy slideshow presentation disputing the ethics committee’s allegations in August. She has consistently maintained that she is innocent of all charges.



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cultureofcorruption; draintheswamp; ethics; nlpc; waters
There have also been reports that the committee discovered a series of emails that may contradict some of Waters’ defense, adding to the delay.

Surely Maxine Waters would never lie. /sarc

1 posted on 12/09/2010 2:03:03 PM PST by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

hunh. wonder what “backed her off.”


2 posted on 12/09/2010 2:03:52 PM PST by the invisib1e hand (oy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

House Ethics Committee /sarc


3 posted on 12/09/2010 2:05:07 PM PST by jessduntno (TSA: "Because screwing you with your pants ON just wasn't enough.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand

She was probably told if she backed off they would go extremely easy on her. No problem if dems break the law - it is expected and allowed.


4 posted on 12/09/2010 2:07:37 PM PST by kezzek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
"While Waters’ and her fellow Democrats still hold the majority in the House until January 1st, the congresswoman will face a much less friendly Republican-controlled congress if her trial resumes after the New Year."

They knew this when they made the delay. Maybe they don't care what happens to Maxine.

5 posted on 12/09/2010 2:17:53 PM PST by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

I hope the large mouth bass gets all she deserves.


6 posted on 12/09/2010 2:21:02 PM PST by freebird5850 (When 0bama fails, FREEDOM prevails!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

That’s possible. I believe some damning evidence showed up and was kept from the ethics panel, we’ll soon see.


7 posted on 12/09/2010 2:23:36 PM PST by jazusamo (His [Obama's] political base---the young, the left and the thoughtless: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

I believe in Socialism....She needs to give me a portion of her income....it’s only fair.


8 posted on 12/09/2010 2:24:20 PM PST by Dallas59 (President Robert Gibbs 2009-2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59

LOL! Stranger things have happened, especially with her.


9 posted on 12/09/2010 2:26:17 PM PST by jazusamo (His [Obama's] political base---the young, the left and the thoughtless: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand
Ed Morrissey of HotAir said if she squawks she thinks she has a way out. If she's silent then the committee probably has the goods on her.

She started squawking then shut up. Hmm?

In the words of All the President's Men's Ben Bradlee maybe "she's gonna get her tit's caught in a wringer."

10 posted on 12/09/2010 2:36:33 PM PST by rvoitier (Progressives are in the GOP, too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rvoitier

coulda done without that imagery, hombre.


11 posted on 12/09/2010 2:39:23 PM PST by the invisib1e hand (oy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Hey Maxine:

NO JUSTICE, NO PEACE!

Back atcha, ma’am.


12 posted on 12/09/2010 2:52:28 PM PST by Ole Okie (American)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

She’s such a dope.


13 posted on 12/09/2010 3:06:58 PM PST by Bullish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rvoitier

I agree. LOL!


14 posted on 12/09/2010 3:08:27 PM PST by jazusamo (His [Obama's] political base---the young, the left and the thoughtless: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Mrs. Buckwheat ain't seen nuthin' yet.


Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.

15 posted on 12/09/2010 3:11:55 PM PST by The Comedian (Government: Saving people from freedom since time immemorial.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

My guess exactly. I think even the Democrats are embarrassed by her and they want to be rid of her.


16 posted on 12/09/2010 3:22:58 PM PST by rcofdayton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Bullish

somebody whispered a little secret into her ear- about herself!


17 posted on 12/09/2010 3:26:06 PM PST by MissDairyGoodnessVT ( JC Webster's fav words: "the boiling pits of sewage" roflmao)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand

They showed her the evidence against her!


18 posted on 12/09/2010 5:39:41 PM PST by heshtesh (ueer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: heshtesh

Bookmark


19 posted on 12/09/2010 7:43:33 PM PST by Publius6961 ("In 1964 the War on Poverty Began --- Poverty won.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson