Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AdmSmith; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; bigheadfred; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; Delacon; ...

Thanks mojito.


12 posted on 12/09/2010 4:08:48 PM PST by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SunkenCiv
In case your wondering about the title of the article, it is a rebuttal of a review of Kurtz's book that Frum did. The rebuttal is by Kurtz. Kurtz, in his book about Obama asserted the statements in the article body above. He also says this about Frum in closing in the article:

The root of the problem (Frum's confusion and resulting poorly argued articles and positions -JB), I think, is that Frum’s analysis of conservatism’s dilemma in 2008 has served him poorly. Frum’s ostensible purpose is to “build a conservatism that can win again.” But we already won, and did so by taking a very different route than that recommended by Frum.

A look at Frum’s 2008 book Comeback helps to measure the distance we’ve traveled in two years. In Comeback, Frum warns against reviving a “more principled” Reagan-style conservatism — as the Tea Party has just done, with great success. “Most Americans [want] the federal government to spend more rather than tax less,” said Frum in 2008. On issues like health care and the environment, Frum declared, “conservatives find themselves on the less popular side of the great issues of the day.” I rule the article a TKO in the second round to the victor, Kurtz!

14 posted on 12/09/2010 4:21:16 PM PST by Jack Black ( Whatever is left of American patriotism is now identical with counter-revolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson