Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This was a little known, but very handy provision of Social Security. I certainly had planned to use it if I neared age 70 and my health remained good.

The hits just keep on coming.

1 posted on 12/10/2010 6:28:46 AM PST by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: nascarnation
Let's be fair. At least LBJ made sure that the Viet Nam war IS being properly funded.

We need to ask Peeloffski how much longer this war will continue!

2 posted on 12/10/2010 6:32:38 AM PST by Young Werther ("Quae cum ita sunt" Since these things are so!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nascarnation
The Bismarckian/Beveridgian welfare state is approaching its final days throughout the entire western world. The warning signs are as clear as a bell.

My advice to everyone is to start preparing for the inevitable now.

3 posted on 12/10/2010 6:32:53 AM PST by jpl (Our forebears really gave their lives so we could be groped by bureaucratic retards at the airport?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nascarnation

What allows the executive branch to simply change people’s benefits without a vote on a bill from congress?

I think we have a real problem in this country — the congress apparently passes a LOT of bills where the entire operation of the bill is up to the executive.

How else can a president act like a king and decide whether we can drill offshore or not, or decide which companies have to have compliant health care and which ones don’t, or whether social security recipients can fix their SS benefits.

On the merits, this would make sense if they were simply going to require the SS recipient to include interest payments when returning the money. It was never really fair to give the money interest-free.


4 posted on 12/10/2010 6:33:00 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nascarnation
"The processing of these withdrawal applications is also a poor use of the agency's limited administrative resources in a time of fiscal austerity ..."
Oh yeah, a manpower shortage in the SS offices at a time when gov't employment has never been higher. BS BS BS.
In fact, with the WWII generation just about gone, and the Boomers just now getting onto SS, this is even more BS.
5 posted on 12/10/2010 6:37:39 AM PST by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nascarnation
I certainly had planned to use it if I neared age 70 and my health remained good.

Damn, so did I.

7 posted on 12/10/2010 6:41:51 AM PST by justlurking (The only remedy for a bad guy with a gun is a good WOMAN (Sgt. Kimberly Munley) with a gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nascarnation

Wonder how many other rules they’re going to change before I reach retirement....


8 posted on 12/10/2010 6:46:41 AM PST by Eepsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nascarnation

Thanks for posting. Interesting.


10 posted on 12/10/2010 6:56:49 AM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nascarnation
I just went through this rule with my tax guy when we did last year's returns. We planned to do the payback next spring.

It seems that every advantage that I might be able to exercise goes away or has an exemption that excludes me.

Can't re-fi because I'm elf employed and not working. Can't get unemployment because I'm self employed and not working. Can't get government stimulus checks because I'm self employed and not working.

11 posted on 12/10/2010 7:07:16 AM PST by Baynative (on to 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nascarnation

Not only was there no COLA in 2010, there will be none in 2011, and those on SS will have even less in their checks next year...wealth sharing.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2640005/posts


14 posted on 12/10/2010 7:56:18 AM PST by GailA (NO JESUS, NO CHRISTmas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nascarnation

I eagerly await the day when the crowds in DC do the same thing to the Obamaloon and his sorry wife in their limo that was done to Prince Charles.


15 posted on 12/10/2010 8:36:48 AM PST by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nascarnation
"The tactic involves filing a claim, investing the Social Security income into something relatively safe, and then after a few years, suspending benefits and repaying," said Mary Johnson, a policy analyst for the Senior Citizens League. "The Social Security Administration only required repayment of the benefits, not any interest or any fines. Thus seniors using this tactic pocketed all interest or earnings. Later on perhaps at age 70 they could then file a new claim and receive a boosted benefit."

The risk, Johnson said, is when investments go bad and seniors can't afford to repay the benefits.

"The last thing most seniors need today is to be betting their Social Security income on iffy investments," Johnson said.

Like Sosha Security?

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/12/10/politics/main7139638.shtml

18 posted on 12/11/2010 1:19:10 PM PST by Libloather (Teapublican, PROUD birther, mobster, pro-lifer, anti-warmer, enemy of the state, extremist....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson