This was a little known, but very handy provision of Social Security. I certainly had planned to use it if I neared age 70 and my health remained good.
The hits just keep on coming.
To: nascarnation
Let's be fair. At least LBJ made sure that the Viet Nam war
IS being properly funded.
We need to ask Peeloffski how much longer this war will continue!
2 posted on
12/10/2010 6:32:38 AM PST by
Young Werther
("Quae cum ita sunt" Since these things are so!)
To: nascarnation
The Bismarckian/Beveridgian welfare state is approaching its final days throughout the entire western world. The warning signs are as clear as a bell.
My advice to everyone is to start preparing for the inevitable now.
3 posted on
12/10/2010 6:32:53 AM PST by
jpl
(Our forebears really gave their lives so we could be groped by bureaucratic retards at the airport?)
To: nascarnation
What allows the executive branch to simply change people’s benefits without a vote on a bill from congress?
I think we have a real problem in this country — the congress apparently passes a LOT of bills where the entire operation of the bill is up to the executive.
How else can a president act like a king and decide whether we can drill offshore or not, or decide which companies have to have compliant health care and which ones don’t, or whether social security recipients can fix their SS benefits.
On the merits, this would make sense if they were simply going to require the SS recipient to include interest payments when returning the money. It was never really fair to give the money interest-free.
To: nascarnation
"The processing of these withdrawal applications is also a poor use of the agency's limited administrative resources in a time of fiscal austerity ..."
Oh yeah, a manpower shortage in the SS offices at a time when gov't employment has never been higher. BS BS BS.
In fact, with the WWII generation just about gone, and the Boomers just now getting onto SS, this is even more BS.
5 posted on
12/10/2010 6:37:39 AM PST by
oh8eleven
(RVN '67-'68)
To: nascarnation
I certainly had planned to use it if I neared age 70 and my health remained good. Damn, so did I.
7 posted on
12/10/2010 6:41:51 AM PST by
justlurking
(The only remedy for a bad guy with a gun is a good WOMAN (Sgt. Kimberly Munley) with a gun)
To: nascarnation
Wonder how many other rules they’re going to change before I reach retirement....
8 posted on
12/10/2010 6:46:41 AM PST by
Eepsy
To: nascarnation
Thanks for posting. Interesting.
10 posted on
12/10/2010 6:56:49 AM PST by
PGalt
To: nascarnation
I just went through this rule with my tax guy when we did last year's returns. We planned to do the payback next spring.
It seems that every advantage that I might be able to exercise goes away or has an exemption that excludes me.
Can't re-fi because I'm elf employed and not working. Can't get unemployment because I'm self employed and not working. Can't get government stimulus checks because I'm self employed and not working.
11 posted on
12/10/2010 7:07:16 AM PST by
Baynative
(on to 2012)
To: nascarnation
14 posted on
12/10/2010 7:56:18 AM PST by
GailA
(NO JESUS, NO CHRISTmas!)
To: nascarnation
I eagerly await the day when the crowds in DC do the same thing to the Obamaloon and his sorry wife in their limo that was done to Prince Charles.
To: nascarnation
"The tactic involves filing a claim, investing the Social Security income into something relatively safe, and then after a few years, suspending benefits and repaying," said Mary Johnson, a policy analyst for the Senior Citizens League. "The Social Security Administration only required repayment of the benefits, not any interest or any fines. Thus seniors using this tactic pocketed all interest or earnings. Later on perhaps at age 70 they could then file a new claim and receive a boosted benefit."The risk, Johnson said, is when investments go bad and seniors can't afford to repay the benefits.
"The last thing most seniors need today is to be betting their Social Security income on iffy investments," Johnson said.
Like Sosha Security?
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/12/10/politics/main7139638.shtml
18 posted on
12/11/2010 1:19:10 PM PST by
Libloather
(Teapublican, PROUD birther, mobster, pro-lifer, anti-warmer, enemy of the state, extremist....)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson