Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: vrwc1
One would hope so. And that was my reaction too. However, this is from the linked article.

Some things that the Court would likely leave unaffected would include the expansion of Medicaid, reporting obligations for businesses and hospitals, expansion of the Children’s Health Insurance Program, funds for “family planning,” expansion of state aging and disability resource centers, expanded funding for prevention programs and workplace education, reforms to inpatient rehabilitation and hospices, the addition of value-based payments for physicians and hospitals, and many provisions relating to Medicare services in rural areas… And that’s just for starters. The point is that the overwhelming portion of this legislation is not tied directly to the individual mandate.

242 posted on 12/13/2010 11:05:48 AM PST by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies ]


To: BuckeyeTexan
The point is that the overwhelming portion of this legislation is not tied directly to the individual mandate.

Perhaps not tied directly, but all the expanded funding, new programs and layers of bureaucracy are paid for by the individual mandate, and are fiscally unsustainable without it.

253 posted on 12/13/2010 11:21:54 AM PST by vrwc1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson