Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Atomic weights of 10 elements on periodic table about to make an historic change
Eureka Alert ^ | 15 Dec 2010 | Leanne Yohemas

Posted on 12/15/2010 5:23:20 PM PST by smokingfrog

For the first time in history, a change will be made to the atomic weights of some elements listed on the Periodic table of the chemical elements posted on walls of chemistry classrooms and on the inside covers of chemistry textbooks worldwide.

The new table, outlined in a report released this month, will express atomic weights of 10 elements - hydrogen, lithium, boron, carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, silicon, sulfur, chlorine and thallium - in a new manner that will reflect more accurately how these elements are found in nature.

"For more than a century and a half, many were taught to use standard atomic weights — a single value — found on the inside cover of chemistry textbooks and on the periodic table of the elements. As technology improved, we have discovered that the numbers on our chart are not as static as we have previously believed," says Dr. Michael Wieser, an associate professor at the University of Calgary, who serves as secretary of the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry's (IUPAC) Commission on Isotopic Abundances and Atomic Weights. This organization oversees the evaluation and dissemination of atomic-weight values.

Modern analytical techniques can measure the atomic weight of many elements precisely, and these small variations in an element's atomic weight are important in research and industry. For example, precise measurements of the abundances of isotopes of carbon can be used to determine purity and source of food, such as vanilla and honey. Isotopic measurements of nitrogen, chlorine and other elements are used for tracing pollutants in streams and groundwater. In sports doping investigations, performance-enhancing testosterone can be identified in the human body because the atomic weight of carbon in natural human testosterone is higher than that in pharmaceutical testosterone.

(Excerpt) Read more at eurekalert.org ...


TOPICS: Canada; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: chemistry; elements; science
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-147 next last
FYI
1 posted on 12/15/2010 5:23:24 PM PST by smokingfrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

FYI yourself. I’m not taking chemistry over :-)


2 posted on 12/15/2010 5:26:02 PM PST by IrishCatholic (No local Communist or Socialist Party Chapter? Join the Democrats, it's the same thing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog; Physicist; AFPhys; snarks_when_bored; Wonder Warthog; Robert A. Cook, PE; ...
Like, *PING*, dudes and dude-ettes.

Thanks, smokingfrog.

3 posted on 12/15/2010 5:28:15 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog
For example, sulfur is commonly known to have a standard atomic weight of 32.065. However, its actual atomic weight can be anywhere between 32.059 and 32.076, depending on where the element is found.

So, what they're saying is, the atomic weight of sulfir will STILL be "commonly known" as being pretty damned close to 32.065.

4 posted on 12/15/2010 5:30:48 PM PST by WayneS (Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm. -- James Madison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog
I knew they were going to do this some day...And that's why I dropped out of chemistry.

And astronomy...I knew they were going to give Pluto flak in the years ahead.

And Zero....do we need Zero?? They did without it for long time...

5 posted on 12/15/2010 5:32:47 PM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

With the price of Au going through the roof, they are going to merge it with Pb and do away with alchemy altogether.


6 posted on 12/15/2010 5:33:26 PM PST by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Ping. Didn’t see this on FR before.


7 posted on 12/15/2010 5:33:28 PM PST by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mizuki san

ping


8 posted on 12/15/2010 5:35:29 PM PST by sionnsar (IranAzadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5:SONY|Why are TSA exempt from their own searches?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
And Zero....do we need Zero?? They did without it for long time...

Do what you want. It means nothing to me.

9 posted on 12/15/2010 5:36:33 PM PST by katana (Actually, there IS something wrong with that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
And Zero....do we need Zero?? They did without it for long time...

We could still do without him.

10 posted on 12/15/2010 5:36:47 PM PST by sionnsar (IranAzadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5:SONY|Why are TSA exempt from their own searches?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

This is extremely important because all chemical reactions are mass-mass reactions.

In stoichiometrics mass is everything.


11 posted on 12/15/2010 5:40:54 PM PST by Mikey_1962 (Obama: The Affirmative Action President. He's shovel ready!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog; glock rocks; SouthTexas; B4Ranch
My only experience with chemistry came in the spiffy little kit I got one Christmas many many years ago but this statement jumped out at me... the atomic weight of carbon in natural human testosterone is higher than that in pharmaceutical testosterone.
12 posted on 12/15/2010 5:42:12 PM PST by tubebender (If you can not read, this thread will tell you how to get help)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog
Vindicated! The mass of elements on the periodic table are based on a unit defined as:

an atomic mass unit or amu is one twelfth of the mass of an unbound atom of carbon-12

This does not take into account any mass defect inherent in the stability of a nuclei. It also assumes an isotopic mixture which may vary from sample to sample.

Point is, as a physics teacher I've had ongoing battles with Chemistry teachers as to the "proper number of significant digits" to use when computing the molecular weights of elements and compounds. I've opted for which ever one made it an whole number because the five, six or seven digit numbers were not necessarily that accurate.

I win!

Sorry, overly punctilious people annoy me more than progressives (people who think they are always right rarely are).

13 posted on 12/15/2010 5:43:38 PM PST by Aevery_Freeman (Fear God and Government - especially when one tries to become the other!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mikey_1962

Thank you!

This is really silly. Yes, some Carbon is Carbon 12, some is Carbon 13, that there exist isotopes doesn’t mean that you can’t calculate the atomic mass of the most common isotope.

Sigh, this is really frustrating.


14 posted on 12/15/2010 5:43:54 PM PST by BenKenobi (Obama's book of the month, Herman Melville's Killin' Whitey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
And Zero....do we need Zero?? They did without it for long time...

That's what my ex-wife said about me...especially the zero part.

Zero was invented by the Islamic Arabs btw.

15 posted on 12/15/2010 5:44:46 PM PST by Mikey_1962 (Obama: The Affirmative Action President. He's shovel ready!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Aevery_Freeman

“isotopic mixture which may vary from sample to sample”

Umm no. The definition of the mass of an unbound atom of CARBON 12, assumes just the opposite. That’s why they specify the isotope. This is so the atomic mass of Carbon 12 will remain precisely 12.000 by definition.


16 posted on 12/15/2010 5:46:54 PM PST by BenKenobi (Obama's book of the month, Herman Melville's Killin' Whitey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: BenKenobi
My point exactly, it is an arbitrary unit.

Please, don't be punctilious.

17 posted on 12/15/2010 5:48:48 PM PST by Aevery_Freeman (Fear God and Government - especially when one tries to become the other!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

What will this mean to the price of Apple stock?


18 posted on 12/15/2010 5:49:17 PM PST by Leo Farnsworth (I'm not really Leo Farnsworth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mikey_1962

You can say that again...

(and I still won’t know what you’re talking about).


19 posted on 12/15/2010 5:51:20 PM PST by smokingfrog (But what do I know?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Hey, it was either count Eris in or kick Pluto out.


20 posted on 12/15/2010 5:51:27 PM PST by Raymann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-147 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson