Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FEDERAL JUDGE HALTS FIRST LARGE-SCALE SOLAR PROJECT ON PUBLIC LANDS
East County Magazine ^ | December 17, 2010 | Miriam Raftery

Posted on 12/17/2010 5:37:58 AM PST by NRG1973

Local and statewide activists battling massive energy projects on public lands are praising a decision issued by U.S. District Court Judge Larry Burns yesterday, while the CEO of Tessera Solar says he is "deeply disappointed" in the ruling.

The federal Judge issued a temporary restraining order halting construction on the first massive desert solar project authorized on public lands—a project that if built, would be one of the largest solar power plants in the world.

The Court ruled that the U.S. Bureau of Land Management failed to adequately consult with the tribe regarding protection of 459 cultural resources identified at 300 locations on the site in Imperial County. Burns noted that the BLM’s draft environmental impact statement found that the project “may wholly or partially destroy all archaeological sites on the surface of the project area.”

The 10-mile-long project would entail scraping 6,000 acres of the desert floor and installing massive parabolic mirrored Sun Catchers made by Stirling Energy Systems. The project could produce 1,000 MW of power by 2012 and is slated to provide power to be transmitted over SDG&E’s Sunrise Powerlink lines through San Diego’s East County.

(Excerpt) Read more at eastcountymagazine.org ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: energy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last
This is the problem with some of the green energy projects. Solar and Windpower are not as energy dense as coal, nuclear and natural gas fired power plants. That is the amount of square feet per MW used by these forms (solar & wind) of energy are greater than the traditional (coal, nuclear & gas) forms of energy generation. That is they take up more real estate per MW generated. So large scale solar and windpower will always be affected to a greater extent by NIMBYs and BANANAs even if they are "cleaner".
1 posted on 12/17/2010 5:38:03 AM PST by NRG1973
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NRG1973
I don't know why, it's good for the environment:


2 posted on 12/17/2010 5:40:00 AM PST by maddog55 (OBAMA, You can't fix stupid...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NRG1973
Hey greenies....



3 posted on 12/17/2010 5:41:38 AM PST by rottndog (Be Prepared for what's coming AFTER America....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NRG1973

I don’t know which side to root for on this one.


4 posted on 12/17/2010 5:42:53 AM PST by maine yankee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

Because “power to the people” is evil?


5 posted on 12/17/2010 5:44:12 AM PST by null and void (We are now in day 694 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: maine yankee
I don’t know which side to root for on this one.

We should hope that they both devour each other over this issue.

6 posted on 12/17/2010 5:45:01 AM PST by NRG1973
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NRG1973

>> That is they take up more real estate per MW generated.

Centralized solar is kind of nutty, in many cases. If it’s near enough to a populated area, it’s taking too much real estate; if it’s far enough away that no one cares, then power distribution is an issue.

Wind power takes space in three dimensions and is therefore even more problematic.

Distributed solar (i.e. residential rooftop) makes the most sense to me.

But don’t get me wrong — NONE of it makes sense if it requires a taxpayer subsidy. I have no problem with alternative energy provided it can make it in the marketplace ON ITS OWN.

FRegards


7 posted on 12/17/2010 5:48:00 AM PST by Nervous Tick (Trust in God, but row away from the rocks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maine yankee

Give the tribe a casino and they’ll forget all about their deserted desert cultural sites.


8 posted on 12/17/2010 5:48:22 AM PST by alancarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NRG1973
BTW...this solar plant may generate 1000 MW of power 10 hours or so a day on 6000 acres of land....San Onofre generates 2350 MW of power 24 hours a day on 84 acres of land.

Conclusion: Only the ignorant, the uninformed, morons, and environmentalists can possibly support this idiocy.
9 posted on 12/17/2010 5:49:52 AM PST by rottndog (Be Prepared for what's coming AFTER America....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NRG1973
" This is the problem with some of the green energy projects. Solar and Windpower are not as energy dense as coal, nuclear and natural gas fired power plants. That is the amount of square feet per MW used by these forms (solar & wind) of energy are greater than the traditional (coal, nuclear & gas) forms of energy generation. That is they take up more real estate per MW generated. So large scale solar and windpower will always be affected to a greater extent by NIMBYs and BANANAs even if they are "cleaner". "

The same can be said about the " Wasted space " and farm land of the production of Ethanol, the drawbacks out weigh the benefits ( if there ever was any benefits of the use of ethanol ) .
10 posted on 12/17/2010 5:51:44 AM PST by American Constitutionalist (The fool has said in his heart, " there is no GOD " ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rottndog
BTW...this solar plant may generate 1000 MW of power 10 hours or so a day on 6000 acres of land....San Onofre generates 2350 MW of power 24 hours a day on 84 acres of land.

Thanks for the comparison info, rottndog. This explains very well why the maintenance costs for large scale solar and wondpower are so high. Instead of going to the other side of the plant to fix a boiler/generator, these projects require maintenance men to drive many miles (with tools and spare parts in their trucks) to fix/maintain the installation.

11 posted on 12/17/2010 5:53:58 AM PST by NRG1973
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rottndog
BTW...this solar plant may generate 1000 MW of power 10 hours or so a day on 6000 acres of land....San Onofre generates 2350 MW of power 24 hours a day on 84 acres of land.

Thanks for the comparison info, rottndog. This explains very well why the maintenance costs for large scale solar and wondpower are so high. Instead of going to the other side of the plant to fix a boiler/generator, these projects require maintenance men to drive many miles (with tools and spare parts in their trucks) to fix/maintain the installation.

12 posted on 12/17/2010 5:54:25 AM PST by NRG1973
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rottndog
BTW...this solar plant may generate 1000 MW of power 10 hours or so a day on 6000 acres of land....San Onofre generates 2350 MW of power 24 hours a day on 84 acres of land.

Thanks for the comparison info, rottndog. This explains very well why the maintenance costs for large scale solar and wondpower are so high. Instead of going to the other side of the plant to fix a boiler/generator, these projects require maintenance men to drive many miles (with tools and spare parts in their trucks) to fix/maintain the installation.

13 posted on 12/17/2010 5:54:28 AM PST by NRG1973
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NRG1973

I’m sorry about the multiple posts...I was trying to correct my post and my PC hung up on me. I hope that no one thinks I was trying to spam the forum.


14 posted on 12/17/2010 5:55:43 AM PST by NRG1973
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist

>> if there ever was any benefits of the use of ethanol

It benefits Big Corn! And, hey, who wouldn’t like it if your Uncle Sam put his powerful gun to everyone else’s head and forced them to buy your product at a premium? ;-)


15 posted on 12/17/2010 5:56:46 AM PST by Nervous Tick (Trust in God, but row away from the rocks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: Nervous Tick
" It benefits Big Corn! And, hey, who wouldn’t like it if your Uncle Sam put his powerful gun to everyone else’s head and forced them to buy your product at a premium? ;-) "

You mean ? like the healthcare plan ? I am so glad our government cares so much about us they want to take care of our needs.. Sarcasm..
17 posted on 12/17/2010 6:02:00 AM PST by American Constitutionalist (The fool has said in his heart, " there is no GOD " ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist

>> I am so glad our government cares so much about us they want to take care of our needs.

Yes, your government is here to service you! Think bull on heifer.


18 posted on 12/17/2010 6:04:08 AM PST by Nervous Tick (Trust in God, but row away from the rocks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick
NONE of it makes sense if it requires a taxpayer subsidy

Very well said. That's the whole issue in a nutshell.

19 posted on 12/17/2010 6:10:42 AM PST by agere_contra (...what if we won't eat the dog food?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

The shade produced by the collectors lowers the temperature of the desert surface. The resulting alterations of the microclime allows microbal and viral growth that decimates the botanical and zoological balance nearby.

In the fragile desert eco community any significant death cascades to the whole area resulting in eco calamity. Further study will be needed to determine if the cascading disaster and increase of the microbal/viral killers will escape to the eco communities beyond the desert. Were that event to occur, life in the southern California cities would be at risk.


20 posted on 12/17/2010 6:13:44 AM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. N.C. D.E. +12 .....( History is a process, not an event ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson