This should be enough to kill the bill, but it won't.
1 posted on
12/20/2010 10:54:28 AM PST by
balls
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
To: balls
Correction to my comment: Treaty not bill.
2 posted on
12/20/2010 10:55:46 AM PST by
balls
(Enough of the politically correct "progressive" label, they are LIBERALS!)
To: balls
FUR. We’ll amend as we see fit.
I see fit to send the whole thing back to you ——unsigned.
3 posted on
12/20/2010 10:55:51 AM PST by
exit82
(Democrats are the enemy of freedom. Sarah Palin is our Esther.)
To: balls
Russia warned the United States Senate on Monday not to rewrite the new arms control treaty Or they'll do what?
4 posted on
12/20/2010 10:58:43 AM PST by
Mr. Mojo
To: balls
That statement should put all lawmakers on halt.
5 posted on
12/20/2010 10:59:58 AM PST by
GoCards
(Why me? Why not me?)
To: balls
It cannot be opened up and become the subject of new negotiations.
Just fine....kill the bill
6 posted on
12/20/2010 11:00:17 AM PST by
illiac
(If we don't change directions soon, we'll get where we're going)
To: balls
This bellicose threat should give Senators pause. Do not modify the treaty, or what, Vlad?
7 posted on
12/20/2010 11:01:23 AM PST by
Army Air Corps
(Four fried chickens and a coke)
To: balls
The Soviets always favored democrats in our national elections. Obviously when we hear the call by the Russians to go in one direction, the opposite course of action is the correct one.
So, what’ll it be, Senators — the Russians have given you your marching orders... WSY?
9 posted on
12/20/2010 11:06:25 AM PST by
ScottinVA
(The West needs to act NOW to aggressively treat its metastasizing islaminoma!)
To: balls
And our leaders are cowering in the corner.
11 posted on
12/20/2010 11:07:48 AM PST by
devistate one four
( jihad is a 2 way street! Kimber CDP II .45 OOHRAH! TET68)
To: balls
Amendments???.... They can submit what they consider problematic (advice) but they can't amend.
Senate should be giving an up or down vote on this.
Russia has not signed off on this. They had....but they withdrew their signature.
To: balls
Or what? What will they do? Be mean to The Failed Obama Administration©. Putin, trust me, is wetting his pants laughing so hard at America. One of his “sleepers” in the White House and nobody on Earth cares a bit about the Cold War START II treaty. This is comedy. Pure global comedy watching the Democrats think any of this matters...
21 posted on
12/20/2010 11:18:59 AM PST by
April Lexington
(Study the Constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
To: balls
Sounding a lot like NK and Iran.
22 posted on
12/20/2010 11:19:01 AM PST by
Carley
(PREPARE FOR THE REINSTATING OF THE MILITARY DRAFT)
To: balls
Is obama & company taking orders from Russia now?
To: balls
No need to amend it, if it is voted DOWN!
To: balls
To: balls
Trash it as it is!
No need to waste time re-writing it.....
28 posted on
12/20/2010 11:40:30 AM PST by
G Larry
(When you're right, avoid compromise!)
To: balls
the strategic nuclear arms treaty, worked out on the strict basis of parity, in our view"in our view" you mean the perspective of the kleptocratic remnant of the USSR?
"strict basis of parity"? This treaty needs to be renegotiated by people who actually love their country and want her and her ideals to win.
Obama, Hilary and their State Department couldn't win a game of checkers against a 5th grader. Why would we let them do our negotiating against lying tyrants that play chess?
30 posted on
12/20/2010 11:50:29 AM PST by
1010RD
(First Do No Harm)
To: balls
Russia warned the United States Senate on Monday not to rewrite the new arms control treaty being debated on Capitol Hill
Russia 'Warned' us?
Yo Vlad, you better remember that American Citizens aren't limp wristed wussies like that guy whose pretending to be president.
So eat sh*t and die, Ruskie!
37 posted on
12/20/2010 12:41:36 PM PST by
Condor51
(SAT CONG!)
To: balls
"Forget Anna Chapman, Obama.
You are our deepest best agent, ever."
38 posted on
12/20/2010 12:47:28 PM PST by
Diogenesis
(Si vis pacem, para bellum)
To: potlatch
0PANSY BOWLS A HUGE 37 SCORE |
39 posted on
12/20/2010 12:50:02 PM PST by
devolve
(. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0ponzi Version 9.8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .)
To: balls
Seems simple enough on the surface. Re-write the treaty, send it back to the negotiating table.
The Russians withdrew their previous signature? Then it's up for re-negotiation from their side regardless.
When our Executive branch leaders or representatives "sign", it doesn't have the force of law until our Senate ratifies. So don't ratify, just send it back with amendments.
Meanwhile, we keep what we have, re-invigorate it, and double or triple-down on what we supply to nations on their borders, in comparison to whatever Putin sells to Hugo, the tyrant.
Not tit-for-tat, but 2X or 3X.
And don't blink.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson