Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FCC Gives Government Power to Regulate Web Traffic
Wall Street Journal ^ | Amy Schatz

Posted on 12/21/2010 2:16:02 PM PST by TheRevolution1776

"For the first time, we'll have enforceable rules of the road to preserve Internet freedom and openness," FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski said Tuesday morning. He said the rules offered "a strong and sensible framework—one that protects Internet freedom and openness and promotes robust innovation and investment."

Republicans at the FCC and on Capitol Hill blasted the FCC's new rules, saying that they could stifle new investments in broadband networks and are unnecessary since there have been few complaints about Internet providers blocking or slowing web traffic.

The FCC's action "is not motivated by a tangible competitive harm or market failure," said Commissioner Meredith Attwell Baker, a Republican, who said she couldn't support the rule because the agency was intervening to regulate the Internet "because it wants to, not because it needs to."

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fcc; genachowski; internet; juliusgenachowski; notbreakingnews; regulations
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
I don't know if this is good or bad in the sense of what the rules now do. However, my biggest gripe with this is how it all came about. The FCC decided on it's own, after two decisions not too, to give powers to the government. Congress said no, the courts said no and they said to hell with it. This is my gripe, this is the erosion of the entire system that our founders established. I could care less right now what the rules entail, I am simply concerned with their blatant disregard of the system. Where is the FCC's Constitutional powers anyways ? All the powers given are to the Congress, Presidential office, Judicial and what's left to the states and the people ? I draw my line here. I say no further is this uncle going to go. Enough already. 1776, remember it.
1 posted on 12/21/2010 2:16:04 PM PST by TheRevolution1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TheRevolution1776

Will. Not. Stand.

Supremes shot this down once and will again.


2 posted on 12/21/2010 2:17:38 PM PST by TruthHound ("He who does not punish evil commands it to be done." --Leonardo da Vinci)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TruthHound

Heads are going to roll over this.

Keep pushing us you jackasses. Karma is going to bite you hard.


3 posted on 12/21/2010 2:18:58 PM PST by se_ohio_young_conservative (Palin or 3rd party... no exceptions !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TheRevolution1776

FCC gives government power? Like HELL you say!! Government derives its just powers from the consent of the governed!!

There will be a day of reckoning!!


4 posted on 12/21/2010 2:19:42 PM PST by Jim Robinson (Rebellion is brewing!! Nuke the corrupt commie bastards to HELL!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: se_ohio_young_conservative
They apparently think they didn't lose badly enough in November.

Looking for annihilation in 2012. Can't think of a better way to make that happen than to try to silence free speech on the Internet.

5 posted on 12/21/2010 2:21:21 PM PST by ohioWfan (Proud Mom of a Bronze Star winner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Kinda like the federal reserve telling a bank they can’t display Christmas decorations.


6 posted on 12/21/2010 2:21:56 PM PST by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TheRevolution1776
FCC Gives Government Power to Regulate Web Traffic

How can anyone give away something that's not theirs to give?
7 posted on 12/21/2010 2:22:45 PM PST by Sopater (...where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty. - 2 COR 3:17b)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheRevolution1776
My concern is whether or not this will cause my bill to go down or up?

More than likely, the latter.

8 posted on 12/21/2010 2:23:21 PM PST by Realman30 ("I've already made a donation to Haiti. It's called taxes". . . . El Rushbo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Government derives its just powers from the consent of the governed!!

That's what I thought. Are we no longer in America?
9 posted on 12/21/2010 2:24:04 PM PST by Sopater (...where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty. - 2 COR 3:17b)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TheRevolution1776

Whooooahhhhh!..... wait just a damn minute here!...

FCC gives Government the right????

Now it’s Government by the FCC?

Even liberals should understand the idiocy of this.

FCC was established and empowered BY the government!

Now the FCC gives power to the government?

Who the hell said this anyway?


10 posted on 12/21/2010 2:26:19 PM PST by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheRevolution1776

At this point it is safe to argue that law is simply words on paper and we may need to abolish this current system.


11 posted on 12/21/2010 2:28:09 PM PST by TheRevolution1776 (2nd Amendment applies also to religous threats. I don't call 911 even after your down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheRevolution1776

Hey new Congress, you hear that?

There’s a snotty regulatory agency that thinks your business is their business.

Sounds to me, in this age of trillion dollar deficits, like they could stand to be downsized.

The FCC, with 10 employees, could easily move their department into a couple of Winnebagos in the parking lot of the Smithsonian.


12 posted on 12/21/2010 2:28:16 PM PST by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan

“Looking for annihilation in 2012.”

Assuming we can still use the web for political purposes then, yes, annihilation.


13 posted on 12/21/2010 2:29:10 PM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Realman30
My concern is whether or not this will cause my bill to go down or up?

Don't be concerned. The Central Government will subsidize your bill, it won't cost you a dime. Of course you will only be able to go to sites approved by the government, but this is not one of your concerns.

14 posted on 12/21/2010 2:30:06 PM PST by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: se_ohio_young_conservative
Reeducation camps are coming and if there were a Senate vote at least 11 RINO’s would agree.
15 posted on 12/21/2010 2:32:23 PM PST by ChiMark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: se_ohio_young_conservative
Reeducation camps are coming and if there were a Senate vote at least 11 RINO’s would agree.
16 posted on 12/21/2010 2:32:23 PM PST by ChiMark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Safrguns

Okay so I read this thing and like y’all, I’m wary.

At it’s least dangerous, this thing is the work of some business or other that wants to be able to transmit wireless data with NO interference from the Internet providers. Seems some Internet providers, Comcast is listed as one, will deliberately slow down data transmission in some cases. In the example provided in the article is was transmitting data from peer-to-peer files. Like If I wanted to send all my files over the Internet to you. The Internet provider deliberately slowed down these kinds of transmissions to better allow for other web/email users faster access that these bulky transmissions were slowing down.

But as is pointed out over and over, it really isn’t that big of a problem so I’m not buying that this is why the FCC wants its hands on our wireless transmitted data.

The bigger thing here, damn I must be dreaming, but I could swear we that this is an agency of the government voting that the government, in the form of this agency of course, has the right to regulate this kind of stuff.

It’s like I’m part of a human relations committee appointed by my company to study pay rates and benefits for a this same company. One day, boom, this committee votes that we can now, BOOM, hire and fire people.

Heh.

You can’t make this stuff up.

Next, the FCC will vote themselves the power to implement the death penalty, well why the hell not?


17 posted on 12/21/2010 2:36:46 PM PST by Fishtalk (Dance like nobody's watching; Sing like nobody's listening; Blog like nobody's reading.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
FCC gives government power? Like HELL you say!! Government derives its just powers from the consent of the governed!! There will be a day of reckoning!!

There has to be more than just email writing and calling Congress, AND SOON.
18 posted on 12/21/2010 2:37:20 PM PST by Cheerio (Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TheRevolution1776

The people have proven they can’t be trusted with Free Speech.

So we will take it from you.

Now pay your taxes, we need raises.


19 posted on 12/21/2010 2:40:13 PM PST by Tzimisce (It's just another day in Obamaland.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Unfortunately that is no longer true. We have rulers who govern by fiat. My only question is when are we going to wrest the power from them and back where it belongs.


20 posted on 12/21/2010 2:42:32 PM PST by Lil Flower (American by birth. Southern by the Grace of God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson