Skip to comments.
GOP lawmakers threaten to repeal Net neutrality
www.politico.com ^
| 12-21-2010
| By TONY ROMM
Posted on 12/21/2010 3:42:42 PM PST by NoLibZone
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-139 next last
1
posted on
12/21/2010 3:42:51 PM PST
by
NoLibZone
To: NoLibZone
The members each threatened to limit the agency's funds or restrict its jurisdiction in the aftermath of the FCCs vote,...Skinning a cat with attitude!
2
posted on
12/21/2010 3:45:24 PM PST
by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, question everyone else)
To: NoLibZone
"Less than an hour after the Federal Communications Commission approved net neutrality rules..." Good on them.
3
posted on
12/21/2010 3:45:33 PM PST
by
NoLibZone
(Homosexuals oppose diversity.)
To: NoLibZone
Threaten?
Like it’s a bad thing?
4
posted on
12/21/2010 3:45:57 PM PST
by
hattend
(The meaning of the 2010 election was rebuke, reject, and repeal. - Sarah Palin)
To: NoLibZone
C’mon now. Where’s all the GOP haters? Cmon? Where’s the “spineless” comments?
5
posted on
12/21/2010 3:46:14 PM PST
by
sam_paine
(X .................................)
To: NoLibZone
President Barack Obama also backed the FCC, saying the decision is an important component of our overall strategy Nuff said......
6
posted on
12/21/2010 3:48:31 PM PST
by
LaineyDee
(Don't mess with Texas wimmen!)
To: NoLibZone
7
posted on
12/21/2010 3:49:35 PM PST
by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs said?)
To: sam_paine
GOP “threatens” is like Obama sending a stern letter.
I’ll believe a repeal when I see it.
Meanwhile,
Countdown to throwing out the spineless and RINOs in 2012.
To: sam_paine
It hasn’t gotten tot he Senate yet. Senate GOP is where spineless resides.
9
posted on
12/21/2010 3:51:06 PM PST
by
jospehm20
To: NoLibZone
I am confused. Will someone please enlighten me why it is bad to force such carriers as Comcast to not censor the content of web sites they carry, i.e., refuse to carry the web sites? I can understand the furor over porn on the Internet but to ban some web site because of its political views or ethnic makeup or religious views or, etc., etc. does not make sense to me.
I can also understand shutting down web sites that steal property such as songs and stories. But much beyond that seems to be to be in realm of free speech and should not be discriminated against.
Am I reading the comments all wrong?
Thank you
To: sam_paine
Cmon now. Wheres all the GOP haters? Cmon? Wheres the spineless comments? Talk is cheap. I'll reserve judgement until they actually do something concrete.
To: NoLibZone
They can threaten all they want. Until both houses of congress pass it, and 0bama signs it, or doesn’t and it becomes law - it don’t mean shinola.
12
posted on
12/21/2010 3:51:34 PM PST
by
Keith in Iowa
(FR Class of 1998 | TV News is an oxymoron. | MSNBC = Moonbats Spouting Nothing But Crap.)
To: NoLibZone
President Barack Obama also backed the FCC, saying the decision is an important component of our overall strategy to advance American innovation, economic growth and job creation. ???
Restrict freedom and create jobs...yeah that will work.
These people have no shame.
13
posted on
12/21/2010 3:51:34 PM PST
by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, question everyone else)
Comment #14 Removed by Moderator
To: NoLibZone
Can you explain why this is a good thing? I don’t really want Comcast and AT&T deciding what sites I can visit or what I can download. Isn’t net neutrality what we have now?
To: NoLibZone
Rep. Greg Walden (R-Ore.)
FINALLY! God has smiled upon Oregon, and SENSE appears from this state I live in!
I need to go play the lottery.
16
posted on
12/21/2010 3:54:51 PM PST
by
Danae
(Anail nathrach, orth' bhais's bethad, do chel denmha)
To: LibLieSlayer
Well, Boehner said he is going to do something about this.
Is it all hat and no cattle? You be the judge. I just don’t know.
The fact that they are GOP doesn’t make me feel a whole lot better.
I want actions that result in severe action, not just talk.
17
posted on
12/21/2010 3:55:44 PM PST
by
dforest
To: ProudFossil
Because it is yet another industry the government thinks it has the right to control.
No, it doesn’t have the right.
18
posted on
12/21/2010 3:56:28 PM PST
by
Danae
(Anail nathrach, orth' bhais's bethad, do chel denmha)
To: NoLibZone
GOP lawmakers threaten to repeal Net neutrality”
I pray that they repeal this one. I could not believe my ears this morning listening to the radio. Last time govt. got involved in anything it was just a mess.
19
posted on
12/21/2010 3:57:34 PM PST
by
Ancient Drive
(DRINK COFFEE! - Do Stupid Things Faster with More Energy!)
To: ProudFossil
Will someone please enlighten me why it is bad to force such carriers as Comcast to not censor the content of web sites they carry, i.e., refuse to carry the web sites?
I am still fence-sitting too. I don't know which I would trust less -- the FCC or the Cable company. I do know the cable company throttles internet speed, and their claims to deliver certain speeds are preferenced with the coniditonal, "up to XYZ Mbps".
20
posted on
12/21/2010 3:58:03 PM PST
by
TomGuy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-139 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson