Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Home for Christmas: Father dramatically set free after shooting teenager in 'lynch mob' gang
Daily mail ^ | 24th December 2010 | DAVID GARDNER

Posted on 12/24/2010 8:08:49 AM PST by Charlespg

A black father has been sensationally pardoned for the racially charged murder of a white teenager he claimed was part of a ‘lynch mob’ that stormed his home.

John White, 57, was freed after serving just five months of a two-to-four-year prison sentence for the shooting.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: aaronwhite; banglist; racism; selfdefence; troll; zotbait
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-117 next last
To: Pollster1

You keep saying “on his property”. Where do you get this?

Also, you speak of Mr. White being within inches of the belligerents. How do you suppose this came to pass?


41 posted on 12/24/2010 9:26:27 AM PST by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: devere

Are you 12?


42 posted on 12/24/2010 9:27:07 AM PST by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
How can they possible judge the correctness of the prosecution without knowing the facts of the case?

Because that's the way it works.

An appellate court either State or Federal will look at any 'new" evidence that could possibly emerge if it has the potential to change the outcome. They would then overturn that conviction and order a new trial. But that is very rare.

Outside of that, they will only overturn a conviction and send it back to a trial court if it can be demonstrated that either the judge, jury or prosecutor did not do their jobs correctly and according to the rules.

They don't judge innocence or guilt. They only review the process used to reach that verdict. See this from the ABA. http://www.abanet.org/publiced/courts/appeals.html

43 posted on 12/24/2010 9:28:56 AM PST by Ditto (Nov 2, 2010 -- Partial cleaning accomplished. More trash to remove in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam

Some drunken white trash meat head was charging onto his property. Mr White was justified, peru understanding of the case, and the little gabbaghoul should have thought twice. But then again, this is Lawn Guyland, Aja LIdiot land where the cops are “always right” and drunken coogine thugs are always “nice little boys.”


44 posted on 12/24/2010 9:30:38 AM PST by Clemenza (Remember our Korean War Veterans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam

IBTZ

enjoy your stay on freerepublic


45 posted on 12/24/2010 9:34:10 AM PST by Charlespg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam
Ah, showing the old school outer borough/Lawn Guyland tribalism here. Not happy that a black "interloper" shot a drunken Vinny are you?

I may not care for the racial rhetoric on both sides of this case, but Mr. White was justified despite what all the whimsy Vinnys and Paddies in LIdiot land may think.

46 posted on 12/24/2010 9:34:37 AM PST by Clemenza (Remember our Korean War Veterans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam

But it seems this guy was pardoned by the governor. He didn’t win any court appeals.


47 posted on 12/24/2010 9:35:17 AM PST by Ditto (Nov 2, 2010 -- Partial cleaning accomplished. More trash to remove in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1
My question is whether a reasonable person could have reached that decision while outnumbered by a bunch of angry drunks in the available time and with mere inches separating him from the nearest belligerent.

I think a reasonable person would have first dialed 911 asking for help. Arming oneself to confront a mob shows me an intent to reach a violent conclusion.

48 posted on 12/24/2010 9:36:00 AM PST by LoneRangerMassachusetts (The meek shall not inherit the Earth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam

“Are you 12?

That would be great!

“Youth is wasted on the young.”
George Bernard Shaw


49 posted on 12/24/2010 9:37:27 AM PST by devere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: devere
I don't know anything about this case and don't really care. But I seriously doubt that any of the fifty states offer implied permission to shoot someone who is standing outside your house, whether he is alone or with others, shouting threats, racial slurs, or anything else.

If what you say were true then there would be a few dead SEIU thugs from last year's hate demonstrations outside bankers' homes.

50 posted on 12/24/2010 9:37:56 AM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza
...was charging onto his property.

You misrepresent the facts of the case.

51 posted on 12/24/2010 9:40:53 AM PST by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
Are you implying that if, as the original poster asserted, the prosecutor tried the case improperly...

That would be a basis for ordering a new trial. Apparently, the appeals court didn't see an evidence of that.

52 posted on 12/24/2010 9:44:20 AM PST by Ditto (Nov 2, 2010 -- Partial cleaning accomplished. More trash to remove in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

That’s probably why the jury called it manslaughter.

I infer that there was provocation, bad judgment was used, and a tragic accident ensued.

If anyone in the mob had shown a weapon it probably would never even have been brought to trial, even for the gun possession charge, even in Liberal New York.


53 posted on 12/24/2010 9:45:21 AM PST by devere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza

Sweet was defended by Clarence Darrow and was acquitted. Sadly, Sweet committed suicide years later.


54 posted on 12/24/2010 9:47:00 AM PST by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Fishtalk

what a pantload. They were at his house to merely talk to him? I’m happy he’s home for Christmas with his son. The number of people showing up to menace him alone justifies a gun. That’s why Sam Colts gun was called an equalizer. The guy who got shot sounds like a typical jerk. And claiming the black kid was going to rape a white girl? Very 1920s.


55 posted on 12/24/2010 9:48:10 AM PST by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza

You spew a bunch of racialist garbage and then say you don’t care for the racial rhetoric.

You state flatly that Mr. White was justified but don’t say why or explain what the jury got wrong.

Popping off a bunch of racialist nonsense doesn’t make you moral or cool.

Mr. White took another person’s life and this is morally acceptable only in very limited circumstances. The jury decided that those conditions were not met.

Several people on this thread have claimed that Mr. White’s prosecution was racist, yet none of them have given one honest, intelligent reason for this shocking claim.

I think that the leftists have gotten inside of the heads of many of the posters to this thread and have duped then into embracing the inexcusable.


56 posted on 12/24/2010 9:49:23 AM PST by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam

Do you have a link to a source with more detail? This is the first I’ve heard of this particular case.


57 posted on 12/24/2010 9:53:09 AM PST by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Ditto

Exactly. He was justly tried and convicted. He was given a light sentence to the great disappointment of the victim’s family. He was released for no good reason after just five months in jail. All in all this is a terrible miscarriage of justice and the majority of posters to this thread are unwittingly demonstrating just how this miscarriage came to pass.


58 posted on 12/24/2010 9:57:16 AM PST by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

In New Mexico at least, the right to self defense haas nothing to do with where you are. If you are in legitimate fear of death or great bodily harm, you can shoot, no matter where you happen to be standing. A sane rule in a world of jerks like this guy who went to Mr Whites house.


59 posted on 12/24/2010 10:00:47 AM PST by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

In New Mexico at least, the right to self defense haas nothing to do with where you are. If you are in legitimate fear of death or great bodily harm, you can shoot, no matter where you happen to be standing. A sane rule in a world of jerks like this guy who went to Mr Whites house.


60 posted on 12/24/2010 10:01:11 AM PST by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-117 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson