Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FDA's Avastin decision is a breast cancer patient's worst nightmare
Washington Examiner ^ | December 26, 2010 | Sally Pipes

Posted on 12/26/2010 6:40:22 PM PST by gusopol3

ronically, the exact same day the FDA revoked Avastin's approval, its counterpart across the Atlantic did the opposite. The European Union's Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use had conducted a similar investigation into Avastin in breast cancer treatment...

Genentech, Avastin's developer, spent some $2.3 billion creating this treatment. In reaction to this decision, other drug firms will be less likely to make the investments required for research into advanced drugs.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: avastin; breastcancer; deathcare; deathpanels; fda; obamacare; obamadeathpanels; romney; romneycare; romneydeathpanels; socializedmedicine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: kenavi
The FDA's decision is based on a 12 to 1 recommendation by an Advisory Committee of leading cancer doctors, not government bureaucrats.

I think it's pretty well-established that, no matter their credentials, they made the decision based on cost-benefit as opposed to risk-benefit analysis.

Call 'em what you will, we need to have controls on what public funds are spent on.

And that's exactly why people should be fighting against any government involvement in healthcare. If public funds were not being spent, the control would be left to the free market (where it belongs).

21 posted on 12/26/2010 7:46:13 PM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion

“I suspect we agree on that as well.”

We do.

I think I understand what is bugging me about this. The FDA is trying to put a veneer of science on a decision that supports socialism. I think that expensive treatments like this cannot be provided to everyone without regard to cost - but to make illegal simply because there is a chance someone may be willing pay for it and get it, and that there will be many who want it, but can’t pay for it - so take off the political heat by revoking approval for anyone.....this pretends to be science when it is really barely masked class envy.


22 posted on 12/26/2010 7:49:59 PM PST by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer

That is a very good point; kudos for making it.


23 posted on 12/26/2010 7:52:53 PM PST by Oceander (The phrase "good enough for government work" is not meant as a compliment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer

Nicely said...


24 posted on 12/26/2010 7:54:41 PM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...

The list, ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/


25 posted on 12/26/2010 7:59:23 PM PST by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion

Thank you for walking me through the point. I think it’s an important one.


26 posted on 12/26/2010 8:00:41 PM PST by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: gusopol3

Yes. The death panels begin with whimper as Big Media ignores the Socialist Government that is the decider between life and death. And you know they won’t be deciding death for other Socialists, but those who disagree with their Socialist Government. Just like the ‘Stimulus’ money. Everything for the Socialists and nothing for anyone else.


27 posted on 12/26/2010 8:05:37 PM PST by originalbuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer

Pleasure chatting with you...if only all threads were this “nonconfrontational”! Off to bed so I can get up and shovel tomorrow AM. Have a good one.


28 posted on 12/26/2010 8:05:47 PM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

Comment #29 Removed by Moderator

To: gusopol3

No, see, this is the brilliance of Obamacare. The GOVERNMENT makes the decision, not you, not your doctor. See how that works? Isn’t it just effing brilliant? It is going to work out just super. And all of us were just so wrong about how awful this was going to be. We just hated it because Barack is black and the democrats passed it without reading it or getting any republican votes.


30 posted on 12/26/2010 9:18:52 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: peggybac

Got that right. Barney Butt-Pucker would be screaming so loud about that, you’d think his boyfriend had stuffed a football up his pooper.


31 posted on 12/26/2010 9:22:03 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion

The problem is today, health insruance is not “insurance”.

Insurance covers the unexpected, the accidents, catastrophic stuff. Not regular preventative stuff. Not necessarily chronic stuff. They really aren’t insurance as we’ve known what traditional insurance is, it’s more “health supplemental plans” or “healthcare cost coverage” plans, or “health benefits plans”.

People want certain levels of coverage. Knowing they will use the plans. Pregnancy. Sicknesses. Emergencies. Accidents. Routine care. Checkups. Vision issues. Wellness tests. Colonoscopies. Whatever. People expect to use health insurance. So it’s really a benefits plan more than insurance. Nobody knows if their house will ever be destroyed. Or when. Nobody knows if they ever will get into a big car accident, or kill someone while driving. Everybody buys health benefit plans with the expectation they will be using them under one or more scenarios in their future.


32 posted on 12/26/2010 9:28:57 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: devere
The FDA should be abolished.
All of its useful functions can be performed better by the free market.

The ONLY thing that should require a prescription is where the public health is threatened (e.g., to prevent overuse of antibiotics, which allows an individual to spread drug-resistant pathogens).

The FDA already hates me but I don't care. They killed a friend of mine, so the feeling is mutual.

I wonder how many people the FDA has killed with their irresponsible drug decisions.

33 posted on 12/26/2010 11:30:26 PM PST by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

First Avastin, then a thousand other drugs and treatments. If you look at other cancer or auto-immune or stem-cell or bone marrow treatments, you will realize that many, many of them are just as expensive as Avastin. This is only the beginning. Soon the feds will only allow for the dispensing of aspirin, maalox, and hemorrhoid medications. That is what our arsenal will be whittled down to. They will force all R&D to stop and the drug companies will go the way of the vaccine makers. Every new medicine is very expensive in the beginning, then the drug companies usually reduce the cost and let their patent run out. Right now we are being threatened by a new bacterium that is completely resistant to any and all antibiotics. Do you think big pharma is going to invest billions to create a new silver bullet, just to be squashed by our FDA? We might as well go back to bleeding our patients, as that is cheap and will most likely be the only therapeutic approved by our FDA.


34 posted on 12/27/2010 1:39:13 AM PST by NOBO2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: ReverendJames
Why should pharmaceutical companies invest billions to try to find a cure when the FDA comes around later to stop it.

They need to spend less money on research and more on lobbyists, obviously!

35 posted on 12/27/2010 3:16:21 AM PST by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NOBO2

The FDA has been doing this for decades—it’s not just Obamacare driving this. It’s also the overly litigious society.

There’s no sanction against them when they overreact, so naturally they use their power and cover their assets whenever it comes to it. A simple announcement is all thast’s needed sometimes—not even a warning—and the thing is pulled from the shelf because of the lawsuit threat. The phenylpropanolamine (PPA) fiasco was like that.


36 posted on 12/27/2010 3:24:04 AM PST by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: gusopol3

You can look to see more such costly drugs pulled in the future. And drug companies doing LESS research.

Obama Returns to End-of-Life Plan That Caused Stir http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/26/us/politics/26death.html

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2647680/posts


37 posted on 12/27/2010 7:03:34 AM PST by GailA (NO JESUS, NO CHRISTmas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

They don’t even do that...take Lyrica for example the severe side effects hit very high percentage who try to take it.

Pretty poor track record, yet is is approved for treating Peripheral Neuropathy in diabetics and Fibromyalgia. BTW Peripheral Neuropathy is NOT always diabetic cause. Those of us with Fibromyalgia get it too.


38 posted on 12/27/2010 7:09:46 AM PST by GailA (NO JESUS, NO CHRISTmas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: gusopol3

thanks, bfl


39 posted on 12/27/2010 5:51:56 PM PST by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion
decisions like these are the inevitable result of government involvement as a payer of healthcare costs

Exactly right. And because government involvement is so pervasive, the government's decisions can lead to potentially valuable research's being completely shut down, never even begun.

40 posted on 12/28/2010 5:17:03 AM PST by Tax-chick (If I had two dead rats, I'd give you one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson