Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

My Turn: Beware claims of 'free trade'
Salisbury Post ^ | December 27, 2010 | Michael C. Tuggle

Posted on 12/29/2010 9:36:43 AM PST by triumphant values

“Free Trade” agreements create jobs. Our area witnessed a vivid illustration of this in November 2005, when the brick walls of the massive Pillowtex Plant No. 1 in Kannapolis crumbled to the ground. Four thousand pounds of dynamite in shaped cartridges detonated to create a series of controlled explosions that shattered critical supports throughout the structure, and gravity did the rest. Spectators gasped and yelled in response to the succession of booms, and at the huge crumbling sections that slammed to earth with so much force, they blew dust even higher than the towering smokestacks that stood untouched nearby. But all then gazed in silence at the eerie precision of the collapsing structure, which dropped exactly as the engineers of the D.H. Griffin Wrecking Company planned.

It was Griffin’s second-largest demolition job in the company’s history. Its largest was the World Trade Center cleanup. Nine months later, it took down the twin smokestacks.

When Fieldcrest executives first announced the closing in 2003, workers gathered at the plant for weeks afterward during lunch breaks and days off to hold prayer vigils. When the plant closed, 4,300 workers lost their jobs, the largest single layoff in North Carolina history. The Kannapolis area still has not recovered. While the state unemployment rate just increased to 9.7 percent, Kannapolis struggles with a rate of 12.3 percent.

Even supporters of the North American Free Trade Act, which had eliminated tariffs between the US, Canada, and Mexico, admitted Washington’s free trade policies were to blame. Economist Michael L. Walden, in an article entitled, “Pillowtex: Don’t forget the benefits of freer trade,” identified “lower-cost foreign labor” as the reason so many American textile and apparel jobs had vanished overseas. From 1997 to 2002, North Carolina lost 100,000 textile and 70,000 apparel jobs.

(Excerpt) Read more at salisburypost.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: economy; freetrade; korea; trade
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last
To: Daveinyork

How would you know? Unless you are older then most humans you’ve never had free trade.


21 posted on 12/29/2010 10:19:50 AM PST by Durus (The distance between us has grown, and I struggle to quantify it. Windage adjustments are done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Daveinyork
You either.

I know. That's why I didn't inject my personal situation into the conversation like you did.

22 posted on 12/29/2010 10:20:55 AM PST by triumphant values (Never criticize that to your right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Betis70
Were workers in NC upset they took jobs from (relatively) overpaid workers in New England? My guess is they weren’t.

What's your point? That we shouldn't wish to see foreigners more upset than our own countrymen?

23 posted on 12/29/2010 10:23:40 AM PST by triumphant values (Never criticize that to your right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Daveinyork
I like free trade. It reduces the ability of my friends and family to make a live, and then they are more dependent on the government. This makes them more likely to vote for Democrats in the future.
The other good thing is it has removed their self worth, and removed hope for the future from their children, helping them down the path of crime. And of course, there is that Free Trade sends billions to China, so they can build their future as the new world power.
24 posted on 12/29/2010 10:25:24 AM PST by Colvin (Proud Owner '66 Binder PU, '66 Binder Travelall,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: triumphant values

My point is the work moves where the costs are cheapest, whether in country or out.

To the worker laid off or the town that dries up and crumbles, it doesn’t really matter where the mill goes, does it?


25 posted on 12/29/2010 10:31:28 AM PST by Betis70 (First the House, then the Senate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Betis70

So if a Tariff is used to offset subsudies other contries supply, it could mean the costs are lower here.


26 posted on 12/29/2010 10:34:47 AM PST by Colvin (Proud Owner '66 Binder PU, '66 Binder Travelall,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Betis70
My point is the work moves where the costs are cheapest, whether in country or out.

You state this as if it is an immutable law of physics.

To the worker laid off or the town that dries up and crumbles, it doesn’t really matter where the mill goes, does it?

It most certainly matters if it leaves the country as opposed to leaving the county.

27 posted on 12/29/2010 10:40:18 AM PST by triumphant values (Never criticize that to your right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Betis70
To the worker laid off or the town that dries up and crumbles, it doesn’t really matter where the mill goes, does it?

Yes, it does matter because when a company relocates within the US the payrolls and profits and all the feeder businesses stay within the US, and continues to benefit the nation as a whole.

Boeing recently moved some production from the NW to South Carolina. Do you think things would have been just a fine and dandy if they'd moved it to China?

28 posted on 12/29/2010 10:42:25 AM PST by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Will88

And workers are often given the option to`move and work at the new location in the US.


29 posted on 12/29/2010 10:44:03 AM PST by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Betis70

>> Were workers in NC upset they took jobs from (relatively) overpaid workers in New England? My guess is they weren’t. <<

In the meantime the high-tech sector in the Carolina Piedmont region has boomed, as big Internet firms like Google have bought abandoned textile mills to use their giant structures, their huge electric service capacities and their water-fed cooling apparati for large “server farms.”

Moreover, both Carolinas are made even more attractive to big Yankee companies due to their large, semi-skilled labor forces — family-oriented, non-union people who no longer are working in sweatty, dirty textile jobs. The region is becoming a veritable high-tech heaven.

Therefore, I predict that when we finally get rid of the Øbamao-Reid clique and its European socialist policies, and when we inevitably come out of the current “Great Recession,” the death of the textile industry in the Carolinas will generally be acknowledged as a blessing in disguise.


30 posted on 12/29/2010 10:50:20 AM PST by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Will88

Yes at the Federal level I agree. I guess I was thinking as an individualist where the laid-off worker is still just as laid-off whether the mill moves to NC, AZ or Mexico.

Don’t get me wrong, I don’t want such work to move out of the country.


31 posted on 12/29/2010 10:51:49 AM PST by Betis70 (First the House, then the Senate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Hawthorn
The region is becoming a veritable high-tech heaven.

A 10% unemployment heaven.

32 posted on 12/29/2010 11:02:46 AM PST by triumphant values (Never criticize that to your right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Daveinyork

“I like free trade. It reduces my cost of living and of doing business.”

Does it really? Have you ever considered the cost of Food Stamps and Welfare benefits you are paying as a result of so many Americans losing jobs?

Will you continue to like it when it eventually affects you personally? The Service Economy jobs that are left do not pay enough for those people to pay for goods and services it will catch up with you.

Do you realize our leader’s via so called free trade have helped Communist Chinese grow from a third-rate military force whose strength lay only in numbers to a very modern and well-equipped force ready to do battle on a global scale.

And people who welcome this have helped them toward that goal by buying their crap.

Carter gave away the Panama Canal, and now China operates it and has total control of who uses it, what ships come and go, and who disembarks from those ships. Who knows possibly Chinese troops in the future.

Bill Clinton gave China “most favored nation” trading status, screwing American workers for cheap slave-labor-made goods.

Under the Clinton administration, Loral and Hughes were allowed to sell China missile technology and guidance systems for “communications satellites.” Within months we were told that China now bragged about being able to deliver a nuclear warhead to Los Angeles.

Also under the Clinton watch, Chinese spies were discovered at Los Alamos and in other places, some of which stole nuclear secrets for the People’s Liberation Army.

When you realize the Danger you have placed your children/grandchildren in I wonder how much you will like those cheap goods then.

China’s New Missile: A Game Changer?

http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article/557988/201012281822/Chinas-New-Missile-A-Game-Changer-.htm

China has carrier-killer missile, U.S. admiral says

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/dec/27/china-deploying-carrier-sinking-ballistic-missile/


33 posted on 12/29/2010 11:08:56 AM PST by FromLori (FromLori)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: triumphant values
This issue is far more complex than the simple "giant sucking sound" populist slogans you've heard thrown around over the years.

Case in point . . . many of these jobs in the textile industry in places like the Carolinas and Georgia are jobs that moved there decades ago -- after leaving places like New England and upstate New York. I wasn't around back then, but I'm sure you didn't hear too complaints at that time about a "giant sucking sound" coming from the Old Confederacy.

What has really changed for the South over time is that it simply does not have the same comparative cost advantages that it used to have in comparison to the Northeast. There are still some advantages, but not enough to help the region serve as a major manufacturing center for this country's big consumer markets.

The issue is extremely complex, but it comes down to a very basic economic reality: There is an enormous difference between what people are willing to pay for a product or service and what they would charge to do it themselves -- and this difference is what drives our individual buying habits and national trade policy.

34 posted on 12/29/2010 11:22:04 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("If you touch my junk, I'm gonna have you arrested.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
This issue is far more complex...

I'll make it a little simpler then. New England and the Southeast are both within the US. They are our people.

South Korea, China, Mexico, Peru, etc. are outside the US. They are not our people.

Our people are to get preferences by us over their people, because they are our people and no other reason is needed. That's how simple it is.

35 posted on 12/29/2010 11:36:39 AM PST by triumphant values (Never criticize that to your right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: triumphant values
Do not blame “free trade”. Free trade is simple, trade agreements are not since they are actually the opposite of free trade. Free trade is what happens in the absence of any laws.

I favor free trade since it allows me the freedom to labor and spend how I see fit. It keeps me from being a slave to unions, government bureaucrats, and greedy rent seeking businessmen. Do you propose to tell me how to spend my money?

If a US business is not competitive you should try to discover why and not just listen to what you hear. Many of the good jobs we have lost are in capital intensive industries were labor is so small a fraction of total costs that they are a minor consideration.

Why should any company invest or stay here in the good ole’ USA? Is for the privilege of having to deal with OSHA, EPA, Trial Lawyers, Unions, IRS, US Congress, Department of Labor, FTC, FCC, FDA, ICC, USDA, Army Corp of Engineers, Homeland Security, State government, City government, County government, Federal tax (40%), State taxes (9%), local taxes (2%), property taxes, sales tax,... and I just got started. Not to mention that many of our fellow citizens are illiterate or high on drugs and could not work in an advanced factory anyway.

I will take free trade. If you want to huddle up with the idiots that brought us all of the above to tell me how to spend what is mine then try this website http://www.lovearth.net/organizationsagainstftaa.htm

36 posted on 12/29/2010 11:47:21 AM PST by FreedomNotSafety
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: FreedomNotSafety
Yeah, yeah, yeah, another market worshiper who thinks the nation-state exists to do nothing more than protect the flea market.

Try being a patriot for once.

37 posted on 12/29/2010 11:54:02 AM PST by triumphant values (Never criticize that to your right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: triumphant values

So you can’t argue based facts but will insult my patriotism instead? So you will do the patriotic thing and tell me how where and how to spend my money?

Tell me how this works. Give me a few details on how the patriots will control what the rest of will do. Come on super patriot and reconcile your desire to control me with the basic patriot ideal of freedom.


38 posted on 12/29/2010 12:18:27 PM PST by FreedomNotSafety
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: FreedomNotSafety
...but will insult my patriotism instead?

There's nothing to insult. You showed it right here when you wrote: Why should any company invest or stay here in the good ole’ USA?

The question wouldn't even cross a patriot's mind. To you a nation exists just to enable a market. That's an ideology, but it's not patriotism (and it sure isn't conservatism).

39 posted on 12/29/2010 12:25:56 PM PST by triumphant values (Never criticize that to your right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: FreedomNotSafety

Anarchist, came to my mind first. Sure wasn’t patriot.


40 posted on 12/29/2010 12:29:32 PM PST by Realism (Some believe that the facts-of-life are open to debate.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson