Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hollister v Soetoro - DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 14, 2011 (SCOTUS)
supremecourt.gov ^ | 12/29/2010 | SCOTUS

Posted on 12/29/2010 10:49:16 AM PST by rxsid

"Gregory S. Hollister, Petitioner
v.
Barry Soetoro, et al.
Docketed: November 23, 2010
Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Case Nos.: (09-5080)
Decision Date: March 22, 2010
Rehearing Denied: August 23, 2010

~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Nov 22 2010 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 23, 2010)
Nov 22 2010 Appendix of Gregory S. Hollister filed. (Volumes I, II, III)
Dec 22 2010 Waiver of right of respondents Barry Soetoro, et al. to respond filed.
Dec 29 2010 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 14, 2011.

Attorneys for Petitioner: John David Hemenway

Party name: Gregory S. Hollister

Attorneys for Respondents: Marc Erik Elias Perkins Coie, LLP Counsel of Record


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; cbs; certifigate; chrismatthews; congress; constitution; foxnews; hardball; hollister; msm; msnbc; naturalborncitizen; obama; palin; politics; sarahpalin; soetoro
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241 next last
Some background:

Recall, the lower court judge had these nuggets of wisdom in his ruling:

The issue of the President’s citizenship was raised, vetted, blogged, texted, twittered, and otherwise massaged by America’s vigilant citizenry during Mr. Obama’s two-yearcampaign for the presidency, but this plaintiff wants it resolved by a court.

...

Many people, perhaps as many as a couple of dozen, feel deeply about this issue.

HOLLISTER v. SOETORO - New filings - PETITION for Hearing en Banc, MOTION to publish (FR)

HOLLISTER v. SOETORO et al (Justia)

1 posted on 12/29/2010 10:49:21 AM PST by rxsid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LucyT; Fred Nerks; null and void; stockpirate; george76; PhilDragoo; Candor7; MeekOneGOP; ...
Ping!

"Hollister v Soetoro - DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 14, 2011 (SCOTUS)"

2 posted on 12/29/2010 10:50:06 AM PST by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

Where are all of the AFTER-BIRTHERS today?


3 posted on 12/29/2010 10:59:57 AM PST by stockpirate (Sen. Mitch McConnel (R) has betrayed the Nov. 2, 2010 voters w/his tax bill!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

OK what does this mean?


4 posted on 12/29/2010 11:00:30 AM PST by US Navy Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

Our former senator from FL, the “Honorable” Mel Martinez, had the cojones to write me something very similar about Obozo’s eligibility. Only he cited the ELECTION of ‘08 as the crucial vetting process.

He made it sound a bit like jury nullification, which could legally permit the acquittal of a clearly guilty axe murderer.

I really don’t think that Mel liked being senator anyway. Constituents like me made him decide to quit, I think.


5 posted on 12/29/2010 11:01:55 AM PST by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rxsid
According to a recent MSNBC poll, 20% of the respondents believed Obama was not born in the USA.
6 posted on 12/29/2010 11:01:59 AM PST by wolfcreek (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lsd7DGqVSIc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek

And 60% of another one I saw had “questions” about his eligibility.


7 posted on 12/29/2010 11:03:19 AM PST by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

Is this the reason for all the “birther” stories in the past week? Maybe the Wise Latina or the lesbian Justice tipped off Obama this was going to make its way onto the SC calendar. I don’t happen to believe in coincidence.


8 posted on 12/29/2010 11:03:24 AM PST by Hotlanta Mike (TeaNami)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

And what action can the Justices take at Conference?


9 posted on 12/29/2010 11:06:54 AM PST by trumandogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

Huh? Which case is this? I thought Mario’s case was teh best and the last hope.


10 posted on 12/29/2010 11:08:39 AM PST by Frantzie (American TV = owned by the Saudis and elites - keep watching & losing your freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

Who is this ‘Soerto’ guy?

I think a lot of American would like to know

Is this why he was forced to give up his law licence? or else be DISBARRED for filing a false affidavit that he never used another name?


11 posted on 12/29/2010 11:08:46 AM PST by Mr. K ('Profiling' you is worse than grabbing your balls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
And what action can the Justices take at Conference?

They will decide whether or not to hear the case. It takes 4 justices to say yes. Otherwise it goes into the circular file.

12 posted on 12/29/2010 11:09:24 AM PST by Drennan Whyte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

It seems like 2-3 cases made it that far about 2 years ago. They got tossed immediately.

That was the subject of this possibly apochryphal Scalia quote(at a party): “What can I do? It takes 4.”


13 posted on 12/29/2010 11:10:28 AM PST by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

Probably means it is going nowhere. They will look at it a decide to pass on it.


14 posted on 12/29/2010 11:11:24 AM PST by BubbaJunebug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

Orly’s on the 7th.

Hemenway’s on the 14th.

It’s getting interesting.


15 posted on 12/29/2010 11:14:12 AM PST by Elderberry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

The Supremes won’t touch this with a 10-foot pole: they recall all too well the grief they got over the 2000 election, and they feel as stated by Martinez, that the elections WERE the vetting process.

Looking forward, we need to change the laws so that these things are settled BEFORE the elections.
It would only take one major state making it law: my own Texas, for example.


16 posted on 12/29/2010 11:15:36 AM PST by Redbob (W.W.J.B.D.: "What Would Jack Bauer Do?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate
Where are all of the AFTER-BIRTHERS today?

You don't have to scroll down too far to find them, including NS.

Like the good old days!

17 posted on 12/29/2010 11:16:33 AM PST by melancholy (It ain't Camelot, it's Scam-a-lot!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

The question is not whether Obama is an American citizen.

The question is whether is a NATURAL BORN citizen.

There is no question that he is not a natural born citizen, becasue his father was not an AMerican citizen at the time of Obama’s birth. Therefore, he does not meet the Constitutional test of eligibility for the President of the United States.

And considering the damage he has doen and contoinues to inflict on the nation we love, he needs to be bounced out of office ASAP.

Are we a nation of law, or of men?

American needs a reset, before this nation goes down the tubes entirely. And that is the sole purpose of the group of Commie clowns in this Administration—to bring America down to the level of every other second rate country in the world.

After all, American exceptionalism is such a passe concept./s


18 posted on 12/29/2010 11:18:23 AM PST by exit82 (Democrats are the enemy of freedom. Sarah Palin is our Esther.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rxsid
Many people, perhaps as many as a couple of dozen, feel deeply about this issue.

I'd say its a lot more than a couple dozen.

19 posted on 12/29/2010 11:19:06 AM PST by Netizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate

Here I am!


20 posted on 12/29/2010 11:20:49 AM PST by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson