I disagree with your analysis of Sherman Logan’s comments.
It makes sense to discuss these issues ONLY in terms of consenting adults. Otherwise you have additional legal issues involved.
This doesn’t NORMALIZE the behavior. But for the discussion, it means it is IMMORAL but not ILLEGAL.
This does not mean Sherman agrees with the behavior. But it does raise the question, “How do we/society deal with behavior we may find immoral but which isn’t illegal?”
I see you know NOTHING about homosexuals. Tell me what a chicken hawk is.
Thank you. Your question does a considerably better job of explaining my thought than I did.
Sorry buddy.
But the push has been to reduce the age of consent.
Now why would the homos do that?
I don’t know, but one thing’s for certain. If anyone wishes to support homosexualism or the homosexual agenda, they’ll have to do it elsewhere. FR is 100 percent opposed to the homosexual agenda and we don’t want it on FR.
Reverse the very wrong SCOTUS decision - Lawrence vs Texas - that prevented states from enacting anti-sodomy laws if they so wished.
That needs to be done. Infringement on states’ rights by an out of control fedgov.
Once states can make it illegal, then it’s a whole new ball game.
Other point is, why is the fedgov in the business of pushing the homosexual agenda at all? Even if it’s not illegal? Plenty of things are harmful and destructive but not illegal. Should a destructive, immoral, mentally ill behavior be promoted just because a tiny percentage of people want to indulge in it, just because it isn’t illegal (any more)?
Should the gov promote sado masochism? It’s not illegal but it’s immoral, depraved and dangerous. Of course, that’s a bad example since S&M is a subset of homo-behavior that is being normalized.
Let me try to think of another immoral, destruvtive nutso behavior that the fedgov does not promote. How about bulimia? Eating tons until you puke? Plenty of people do it, it’s not illegal. But the fedgov doesn’t promote it or normalize it. It’s immoral because it is gluttonous and wasteful, and since humans are supposed to treat their bodies respectully, it’s also immoral, but the immorality is no where near the level of homosexual acts, so it’s also not a perfect analogy.
Okay, adultery. It’s immoral, and not illegal. Or “swinging”. The fedgov doesn’t promote or normalize these immoral acts, but they are legal and destructive and immoral. No “adultery pride” parades, with city streets closed off, mayors in the convertable, cops with rainbow attire, etc.