no wonder they still live in the stone age...
Posted on 12/30/2010 12:48:38 PM PST by New Jersey Realist
Massive inbreeding within the Muslim culture during the last 1.400 years may have done catastrophic damage to their gene pool. The consequences of intermarriage between first cousins often have serious impact on the offspring's intelligence, sanity, health and on their surroundings
The most famous example of inbreeding is in ancient Egypt, where several Pharaonic dynasties collapsed after a couple of hundred years. In order to keep wealth and power within the family, the Pharaohs often married their own sister or half-sister and after a handful of generations the offspring were mentally and physically unfit to rule.
Another historical example is the royal houses of Europe where royal families often married among each other because tradition did not allow them to marry people of non-royal class.
The high amount of mentally retarded and handicapped royalties throughout European history shows the unhealthy consequences of this practice. Luckily, the royal families have now allowed themselves to marry for love and not just for status.
The Muslim culture still practices inbreeding and has been doing so for longer than any Egyptian dynasty. This practice also predates the world's oldest monarchy (the Danish) by 300 years.
A rough estimate shows that
(Excerpt) Read more at rightsidenews.com ...
“first cousin marriage” - Yuk! - My Daddy was adamant that there wasn’t going to be even any marrying of a 4th cousin once removed. Not that I intended to anyway or had an interest that way. Some things are just yukky!
“I Fatwah in your general Di-rection!”
This has been well understood for a long time by those who have studied the Muzzies and the Royals but it is rarely openly addressed (in either case).
I think Mohammad Atta and a few of the 9/11 terrorists were products of inbreeding. The mental defect shows up in that dead-eyed look they seem to have—I think. You also see it in the those female teachers here in the USA who have affairs with 14-year old boys. I bet some of them are products of inbreeding.
—It’s a dessert wax AND a floor topping!
no wonder they still live in the stone age...
CANTERBURY
Then hear me, gracious sovereign, and you peers,
That owe yourselves, your lives and services
To this imperial throne. There is no bar
To make against your highness’ claim to France
But this, which they produce from Pharamond,
‘In terram Salicam mulieres ne succedant:’
‘No woman shall succeed in Salique land:’
Which Salique land the French unjustly gloze
To be the realm of France, and Pharamond
The founder of this law and female bar.
Yet their own authors faithfully affirm
That the land Salique is in Germany,
Between the floods of Sala and of Elbe;
Where Charles the Great, having subdued the Saxons,
There left behind and settled certain French;
Who, holding in disdain the German women
For some dishonest manners of their life,
Establish’d then this law; to wit, no female
Should be inheritrix in Salique land:
Which Salique, as I said, ‘twixt Elbe and Sala,
Is at this day in Germany call’d Meisen.
Then doth it well appear that Salique law
Was not devised for the realm of France:
Nor did the French possess the Salique land
Until four hundred one and twenty years
After defunction of King Pharamond,
Idly supposed the founder of this law;
Who died within the year of our redemption
Four hundred twenty-six; and Charles the Great
Subdued the Saxons, and did seat the French
Beyond the river Sala, in the year
Eight hundred five. Besides, their writers say,
King Pepin, which deposed Childeric,
Did, as heir general, being descended
Of Blithild, which was daughter to King Clothair,
Make claim and title to the crown of France.
Hugh Capet also, who usurped the crown
Of Charles the duke of Lorraine, sole heir male
Of the true line and stock of Charles the Great,
To find his title with some shows of truth,
‘Through, in pure truth, it was corrupt and naught,
Convey’d himself as heir to the Lady Lingare,
Daughter to Charlemain, who was the son
To Lewis the emperor, and Lewis the son
Of Charles the Great. Also King Lewis the Tenth,
Who was sole heir to the usurper Capet,
Could not keep quiet in his conscience,
Wearing the crown of France, till satisfied
That fair Queen Isabel, his grandmother,
Was lineal of the Lady Ermengare,
Daughter to Charles the foresaid duke of Lorraine:
By the which marriage the line of Charles the Great
Was re-united to the crown of France.
So that, as clear as is the summer’s sun.
King Pepin’s title and Hugh Capet’s claim,
King Lewis his satisfaction, all appear
To hold in right and title of the female:
So do the kings of France unto this day;
Howbeit they would hold up this Salique law
To bar your highness claiming from the female,
And rather choose to hide them in a net
Than amply to imbar their crooked titles
Usurp’d from you and your progenitors.
...... Shakespeare, Henry V
Blacks comprise about 12 % of our population, in smaller cities and communities where there is a 70 % out of wedlock rate for childbirth and "baby mommas" have multiple unknown fathers procreating their child, in second and third generations it will be very easy to see half sister and half brothers procreating since parentage is unknown.
I know, don't tell me, I'm a racist for even thinking it
Nicholas and Alix were 2nd cousins (N's grandmother and A's grandfather were siblings), not 1st. Prince Philip was used because he's a descendant of Queen Victoria in the female line, as was Alix, and mitochondrial DNA inherits only down the female line. (Queen Elizabeth is of course descended down a male line from Queen Victoria.)
Hemophilia is a sex-linked recessive, so it's not related to inbreeding. Alix could have married an Australian aborigine and still would have had a 50% chance of having a hemophiliac son.
Charles II of Spain was indeed a mess due to inbreeding.
I Couldn't give you specifics but the first thing that popped into my mind was the Hapsburgs.
Married My Children.
Who will play Kelly? Ed O’Neill is already committed to “Modern Family”.
May I with right and conscience make this claim?
Intergenerational incest has been accepted in segments of the black community for decades. It’s well known. Ask any urban cop or social worker if you don’t believe it.
Notice the line with all the household hankypanky died out. They aren’t around anymore.
I didn’t do a count but it looks as if at least half the states allow first cousin marriage:
http://marriage.about.com/cs/marriagelicenses/a/cousin.htm
I didn’t do a count but it looks as if at least half the states allow first cousin marriage:
http://marriage.about.com/cs/marriagelicenses/a/cousin.htm
There are a couple of towns north of here with particularly scruffy populations of violent losers, slatterns and their simpleton children. These are old towns tracing their histories back to before the Revolution. All of the family names go back to that era too. One of my best friends commented that these towns represented the shallow end of the Founders’ gene pool.
I think this article gives evidence why so many muzzies
suffer from unibrow.
The Pharaohs married their sisters because the power of the throne was matrilinear - it was passed through the female line.
They used the dna of Prince Philip because they were looking for a gene that was passed through the mother. Prince Philip’s mother was a great granddaughter of Queen Victoria.
Neither Queen Elizabeth’s father nor her grandfather married relatives. The most recent close relatives to marry in the British royal family were first cousins Victoria and Albert circa 1840.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.