Nice.
Posted on 01/05/2011 9:45:39 AM PST by Maelstorm
A mother and daughter in Arizona are accused of sexually abusing a teenage boy for three years and police say the pair did it without knowing about each other’s relationship with him.
The mother, 48-year-old Susan Brock, allegedly met the boy for trysts when he was 13 and continued for three years until this past October, police said. Her daughter, Rachel, now 21, allegedly sent him nude photos and videos of herself between 2007 and 2008, police said.
The alleged victim, now 17, told cops Susan Brock would pick him up after school in her car and take him to secluded areas where she molested the boy, police said.
The boy claims Rachel Brock abused him at her family’s home. Police said the Brocks did not have intercourse with the boy.
Rachel Brock was arrested Wednesday on three counts of sexual misconduct with a minor. Her mother was arrested in October.
Chandler Police Sgt. Joe Favazzo said the Brocks committed the crimes without each other’s knowledge.
"You have a situation where you have a mother who's abusing a juvenile victim, seemingly unknowingly to the daughter, or vice versa, and the daughter is also abusing the same victim," Favazzo told The Associated Press. "I just can't imagine a mother and daughter having this conversation, and the investigators say they don't have anything indicating the two of them knew about it."
Susan Brock’s husband of 28 years is Maricopa County Supervisor Fulton Brock, who announced he was splitting with his wife after her arrest.
"I have filed to divorce my wife. I cannot divorce my daughter," Fulton Brock said. "She is my blood. I will always be her dad. And she needs me now more than ever."
(Excerpt) Read more at nydailynews.com ...
I dunno, I think her broad brush pretty much nailed it.
It would lead to extensive bragging.
But, I'm not 13 anymore and know better. That's why adults run the world.
They (the two women) weren’t showing the same level of attention he was use to receiving??
Is there any suggestion that they use force? Sounds like the kid didn’t consider it “abuse” (until later).
I expect it took him 3 years to decide he didn't like it anymore.
It isn’t abuse if you go willingly. Something tells me the kid liked it, at least enough to keep quiet about it for 3 years.
Nice.
You are correct.
It is the forced sexualization of the children—indoctrination through “sex education”—a forcing of children to think about sex when it is not important to them because of their maturation.
This homosexualization is to pervert the young children to believe they are abnormal (homosexuals) because they most enjoy being with members of their own sex. This is natural development of a healthy sexual identification. All psychology explains this “natural” sexual identity formation of children identifying with members of their own sex.
The imposition of “forced learning” about homosexuality (something young children could NEVER imagine unless molested or perverted by images from adults or sexually abused children) is intentional.
It is to create a pagan paradigm in place of the Judeo-Christian worldview—where good and evil are redefined. This will justify evil and create a society that goes against Natural Law Theory and according to Cicero—no just society can survive if they are not aligned with natural law. Chaos and unhappiness is always the result of daring to go against God’s laws and the laws of nature. This is proven throughout history.
Not arguing your premise, but this was heterosexual contact that is alleged.
I expect it took him 3 years to decide he didn't like it anymore.
The article says that they did not have intercourse with him. I'd guess that he decided he wanted to screw along with whatever they were doing and they said "no".
You have to be very careful what boxes you open as they will always come back to bite you later.
She gots da Krazeee Eyezzzzz.
In Maryland, it's not (legally) molestation at all. Or so I was instructed as a juror.
The homosexuality push is to create no sexual morality. It is the slippery slope that ends the idea that certain sex acts are wrong. If you can justify homosexual acts, then what possibly can be defined as “wrong” or “unnatural”.
Advancing homosexuality to “good” makes the Bible “hate speech” and all the parameters in Christianity become meaningless, such as child/adult sex = “bad”.
Pederasty has always flourished in homosexual societies throughout history because there is no sexual morality.
Cultural Marxists who promote homosexuality (Naked Communist) do it to destroy Christianity and the family. It is quite easy to follow the logic if you understand child development and the history of child “care” and “sex education”. It is so very obvious.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.