Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats move to limit guns, threatening language in shooting's wake
Washington Examiner ^ | 01/11/11 6: | Susan Ferrechio

Posted on 01/11/2011 12:40:55 PM PST by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 last
To: I Buried My Guns

I’m sure you are right. I stand corrected.


81 posted on 01/12/2011 9:36:01 AM PST by Aleya2Fairlie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: ExTexasRedhead

Sadly they are not thinking that far ahead. YET they may get a clue but you will literally have to call them & insist in the strongest of polite terms that using this incident as a Reichstag Fire moment will not be viewed by the citizens kindly.


82 posted on 01/12/2011 10:32:27 AM PST by Nebr FAL owner (.308 reach out & thump someone .50 cal.Browning Machine gun reach out & crush someone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Here is an idea, whenever you are paying for a child’s education, housing, and food, the college your child goes to is OBLIGATED to report any disciplinary actions or contacts with campus police because of your child’s behavior to the parents, regardless of the child’s age.


83 posted on 01/12/2011 3:24:31 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Islam is the religion of Satan and Mohammed was his minion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Governments should be afraid of their people
84 posted on 01/12/2011 6:57:14 PM PST by Nowhere Man (General James Mattoon Scott, where are you when we need you? We need a regime change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

“McCarthy’s bill would target the 30-round clip Loughner used in a Glock 19 handgun. ... while she wants to ban the larger clips, McCarthy is not insisting that gun clips be limited to the 10-bullet limit imposed by the Assault Weapon Ban.”

Lessee here...
Giffords was what, the first person shot? Second? Third? Fourth? Fifth? Sixth? Seventh? Eighth? Ninth? Tenth? Eleventh? Twelfth? ...
How, Ms. McCarthy, is this limitation relevant to that which allegedly initiates it?

As for the other limitation: uh, isn’t it already illegal to shoot, well, anyone?


85 posted on 01/13/2011 3:24:31 PM PST by ctdonath2 (Great children's books - http://www.UsborneBooksGA.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aleya2Fairlie

“Jared’s My Space was taken down but it exists in some files as screenshots.”

In the hours after the event, people like you found a huge amount of info about this maniac, copied it, and has it available if you look or ask.

To the opposite of your lead comment, never before could common folk find such information so fast and so complete about a crazed loon. Instead of waiting for an investigation’s sanitized report, FReepers are, over and over, on the forefront of digging up info, writings, and connections long before normal reporters and investigators can find the same. Go thru the threads posted within the first few hours on FR: it’s one exclusive report and finding after another.

Yes, sanitization follows. Myspace takes down his site - not out of malice, but out of overloading traffic and bad publicity. Contact info is delisted - the living don’t want thousands of yahoos filling their inboxes. Spin is spun - and then unspun as we who do know can speak up loud and fast.

If not for us peons and the Internet, he would be a confirmed rightwing operative. Instead we proved, unstoppably, he was a left leaning crazed loon.


86 posted on 01/13/2011 3:42:20 PM PST by ctdonath2 (Great children's books - http://www.UsborneBooksGA.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2

I know that you are absolutely right about the bloggers on Free Republic. I’m just at a loss to understand how public information, posted news articles and all manner of of information can be “scrubbed” in such short order or how “puplic” information can suddenly become “secret”. I suppose I don’t understand that because I’m not a lawyer.

Perhaps I’m overreacting and being too Orwellian. How tedious to have to sort through a bunch of garbage only to find out that the official looking document you are looking at has been faked! We have our finger in the dyke now. How long can we continue before the dam breaks? The enemies of free speech get more cunning every day.


87 posted on 01/13/2011 3:55:01 PM PST by Aleya2Fairlie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

That shouldn’t have made me laugh until I cried but it did!
Thanks! :) (I think I’m overstressed) (”)


88 posted on 01/13/2011 4:01:05 PM PST by Aleya2Fairlie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson