Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Coble (R-NC) seeks repeal of light bulb standard
News-Record ^ | 1/12/11 | Mark Binker

Posted on 01/12/2011 5:34:05 AM PST by Libloather

Coble seeks repeal of light bulb standard
By Mark Binker
Staff Writer
Wednesday, January 12, 2011 (Updated 8:06 am)

GREENSBORO — U.S. Rep. Howard Coble is among those urging colleagues in Congress to turn off the lights on a controversial provision of the 2007 energy bill.

The Greensboro Republican is a co-sponsor of a bill to repeal what some refer to — erroneously — as the incandescent bulb ban. Texas Reps. Joe Barton and Michael Burgess and Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee, all Republicans, were the original sponsors of the repeal measure.

The legislation is a long way from passing, but it is in keeping with Republican pledges to roll back laws they see as interfering with personal freedoms.

“It seems to me the Congress and the government is inserting its oars in waters where it doesn’t need to go,” Coble said Tuesday, adding that people ought to choose which kind of light bulb they want to use for themselves.

“This ought to be a personal decision rather than being an edict from on high.”

(Excerpt) Read more at news-record.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; US: North Carolina
KEYWORDS: bulb; cfl; coble; incandescent; lightbulb; nc; repeal
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: Pravious

What’s wrong with you?!!!!

Don’t you [libwhine]”CARE ABOUT THE ERF!!!????”[/libwhine]


21 posted on 01/12/2011 6:12:42 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: fourdny2
But wasn’t Coble the original sponsor of the bill to force the change?

Looks like he voted for the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007. He is not on the cosponsors list.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.00006:

22 posted on 01/12/2011 6:16:35 AM PST by Libloather (Teapublican, PROUD birther, mobster, pro-lifer, anti-warmer, enemy of the state, extremist....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

I stocked up enough just for myself, plus a few more to sell at exhorbitant prices to my libinlaws.


23 posted on 01/12/2011 6:19:38 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MrB

Way to go! When it comes to libs charge what the market will bear! That’s what the Gubbermint unions do.

I use a few compact fluorescents for outside night time illumination. None are allowed inside


24 posted on 01/12/2011 6:35:03 AM PST by dennisw (- - - -He who does not economize will have to agonize - - - - - Confucius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

Thanks for the tip! I never knew about the durable bulbs. I’ve used “severe duty” bulbs in my droplight for years and they are a huge plus when working in dark areas.


25 posted on 01/12/2011 6:37:14 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Jan. 12, 2011:

Thomas Edison`s Body Disinterred by Federal Bulbous Police

Looking for Clandestine Electrical Candles

26 posted on 01/12/2011 6:42:31 AM PST by bunkerhill7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

10-year bulbs last longer because they run cooler. This means they are dimmer and ‘warmer’ in color. A 100-W one produces about 1030 lumens. A regular 100-W bulb produces about 1750 lumens.

This means that a 100-W 10-year bulb, at 1030 lumens, is giving out less light than a 75-W regular bulb, at about 1100 lumens.


27 posted on 01/12/2011 6:49:49 AM PST by Right Wing Assault (Our Constitution: the new Inconvenient Truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

While they’re at it, how about a repeal of the low-flow, multi-flush, water-wasting, makes-the-bowl-filthier-and-hard-to-clean-toilet too.


28 posted on 01/12/2011 6:58:27 AM PST by N. Theknow (Kennedys: Can't skipper a boat, Can't drive, Can't ski, Can't fly. But they KNOW what's best!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

Thanks for posting that hospitality industry URL. Maybe I’ll stock up on some of those...


29 posted on 01/12/2011 6:59:55 AM PST by pbmaltzman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Have there been any legal challenges to this idiocy before this? If not, I’m kind of surprised. I did stock up on incandescent bulbs, but I think I’m about half-way through my stock. Must. Get. More. Working under fluorescents gives me a headache.


30 posted on 01/12/2011 7:01:07 AM PST by pbmaltzman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

FYI

http://www.1000bulbs.com/category/energy-efficient-light-bulbs/


31 posted on 01/12/2011 8:19:32 AM PST by Roccus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
'Bout dammed time. I like Howard, he's got his head screwed on straight.

Article stunk, though, I could have done without the editiorializing from the fool who wrote it.

32 posted on 01/12/2011 9:01:53 AM PST by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB
I have a near lifetime supply of incandescents sitting on my shelves...

Me too. They don't eat or drink anything, though. I'll still be able to use them. :-)

33 posted on 01/12/2011 9:05:26 AM PST by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: pbmaltzman
Eventually, once the price comes down, I think I'll go to LED's. Don't cost anything to run, really, and probably will never need to be replaced. The light quality on them is pretty good, too, and I'd imagine it'll get better.

Bought one, already, to replace a bulb in a really hard-to-get-at fixture at Mom and Dad's place. Was worth the expense, so that I didn't come over there to find Dad teetering on one foot at the top of a 10-foot-ladder, balanced on a phone book, resting on a chair, etc etc etc to replace the bulb. "I just don't like to bother you.", he said, like falling and breaking his neck wouldn't be a bother, too.

But, I digress. At $40 or so a pop, I'm not buying them anytime soon for every other fixture in the house.

34 posted on 01/12/2011 9:13:10 AM PST by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: wbill
LEDs... well, something to think about, for the future.

I see your point. We have a ceiling light over our inside staircase, and it's a real pain to get to. I don't have a tall ladder, and I'm scared of heights, so I moved a floor lamp to one corner of the landing.

When we're out of here (hopefully by the end of this year), the landlady can worry about how to replace that bulb.

35 posted on 01/12/2011 11:35:16 PM PST by pbmaltzman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: pbmaltzman
We have a ceiling light over our inside staircase

Yep, that'd be the one that I replaced for Mom and Dad. No idea why builders put it there, it's even a stretch for me with a 16' ladder. Especially when moving the fixture a few feet closer to the top of the stair would make for easier replacement, and not change the lighting at all.

I prefer your solution: "Get a floor lamp. Let the landlady worry about it." :-)

36 posted on 01/13/2011 6:11:55 AM PST by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: wbill
LOL. GMTA.

The air conditioner filter is in the ceiling at the top of the stairs... and while it's not over the stairway itself, it's still close enough to give me the willies were I to change the filter myself. My significant other does that chore, and watching him still gives me the willies.

It'd be nicer if builders could put such things where they're easier to get to. I'm taller than my guy, and it's still a stretch for me.

37 posted on 01/13/2011 10:36:40 PM PST by pbmaltzman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson