Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Seattle giving away free energy-saving light bulbs
KOMO News ^ | 1-10-11 | Connie Thompson

Posted on 01/18/2011 12:02:29 PM PST by NavyCanDo

Seattle City Light is giving away thousands of energy-saving light bulbs, and water-saving faucet aerators and shower heads. Door-to-door contractors will even install them on the spot. The neighborhood outreach project, called "Powerful Neighborhoods" aims to solve a local power problem.

"We did some survey work and discovered that fully a third of the people in Seattle had no CFLs (compact fluorescent light bulbs) in their home at all," said Seattle City Light Energy Management Supervisor Andrew Gibb.

So Seattle City Light is going door-to-door. Specially trained and screened technicians hit the pavement and offer to replace energy-hogging incandescent bulbs with efficient compact fluorescents- free of charge. Homeowners get up to 20 free light bulbs which, according to Seattle City Light, will cut the average electricity bill by$ 60 a year.

(Excerpt) Read more at komonews.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; US: Washington
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last
"Total cost of the project? $1.7 million, part City Light money from rate payers, part federal stimulus grant."

More Wasteful spending of stimulus dollars. And these screened door to door technicians - any bets these are ACORN workers?

Are they really telling us a whole city of people can't go out and but their own light bulbs?

1 posted on 01/18/2011 12:02:31 PM PST by NavyCanDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NavyCanDo

What? No condoms? No free needles?


2 posted on 01/18/2011 12:05:02 PM PST by albie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NavyCanDo
We don't need schools.
We don't need trash collection.
We don't need police departments.

But, by gum, we do need government to deliver light bulbs. That's what makes this country great! [/s]

3 posted on 01/18/2011 12:05:12 PM PST by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NavyCanDo
"Total cost of the project? $1.7 million, part City Light money from rate payers, part federal stimulus grant."

Arrrrgh! End the madness!!!!

My tax money is paying for stupid light bulbs in Seattle! (Take that however you want :-)

4 posted on 01/18/2011 12:06:46 PM PST by REPANDPROUDOFIT (General, sir, it is perfectly ok to call me "ma'am"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NavyCanDo

How long does a CFL have to be on/lit before it saves energy compared to an incandescent? Don’t they use a good bit more during turn on and warm up? ( I really don’t know )

Lights in our house don’t stay on very long, but they do go on and off a lot.

Just curious.

But who did a TCO on this project? This is nothing more than an expensive promotion.


5 posted on 01/18/2011 12:06:58 PM PST by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NavyCanDo
a local power problem.

fully a third of the people in Seattle had no CFLs

Only liberals would consider this a "problem".

EVERYBODY has a right to watch the Canadian Football League !!!

6 posted on 01/18/2011 12:09:06 PM PST by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NavyCanDo

And where do they get “Free”. Are they picking these bulbs from a tree someplace? They are costing taxpayers 1.7 million dollars.


7 posted on 01/18/2011 12:10:07 PM PST by NavyCanDo (Jan 2013 - Sarah Palin sees the Potomac from Her House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NavyCanDo
Homeowners get up to 20 free light bulbs which, according to Seattle City Light, will cut the average electricity bill by$ 60 a year.

And the lasik surgery required to correct their eyes will cost $1,000 a year. Per resident.

Near as I can tell, these mercury death bulbs "save energy" by emitting less light. If you don't believe me, try reading an entire book of small print using nothing but the light emitted by a single CFL bulb.
8 posted on 01/18/2011 12:10:40 PM PST by Question Liberal Authority (Worst. Post-Racial. And Post-Partisan. Agent Of Hope And Change. EVER.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: albie

They don’t need condoms. To the left, the free distribution of mercury death bulbs is a masturbatory experience.


9 posted on 01/18/2011 12:12:52 PM PST by Question Liberal Authority (Worst. Post-Racial. And Post-Partisan. Agent Of Hope And Change. EVER.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NavyCanDo

So if one of them breaks can the City of Seattle be sued for the clean-up cost?


10 posted on 01/18/2011 12:16:41 PM PST by Kartographer (".. we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NavyCanDo

So who is liable for damage when one of these “experts” breaks or drops one?

And what happens to those horrrrrible incandescents they remove? Do they take them away and smash them in honor of Gaea in some environut ritual?


11 posted on 01/18/2011 12:18:14 PM PST by LostInBayport (When there are more people riding in the cart than there are pulling it, the cart stops moving...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NavyCanDo
Heh.
I bought another case of 100-watt bulbs for my hoard... storage facility just last night.
12 posted on 01/18/2011 12:18:14 PM PST by grobdriver (Proud Member, Party Of No! No Socialism - No Fascism - Nobama - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NavyCanDo

When it’s -20 the energy lost to heat is NOT wasted.


13 posted on 01/18/2011 12:18:47 PM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NavyCanDo

Be a shame if fifty or sixty people went down there together, got their free light bulbs, and then accidentally dropped them on the floor, shattering them.

Which is what would happen if some conservative foundation did this.


14 posted on 01/18/2011 12:20:21 PM PST by Steely Tom (Obama goes on long after the thrill of Obama is gone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Question Liberal Authority
Near as I can tell, these mercury death bulbs "save energy" by emitting less light. If you don't believe me, try reading an entire book of small print using nothing but the light emitted by a single CFL bulb.

The problem is that they claim 1/4 the wattage is equivalent, but it looks more like 1/3. A 23 watt CFL isn't as bright as a 100 watt incandescent. Bump it up to a 33 watt CFL and you'll have the light you need.

15 posted on 01/18/2011 12:20:50 PM PST by KarlInOhio (Washington is finally rid of the Kennedies. Free at last, thank God almighty we are free at last.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Question Liberal Authority

I have CFL’s in my house. They work fine, there is nothing wrong with them. They do save money (I’ve worked the numbers).

My proof? I have a wife that was just as dead-set against them as you are; believed every negative thing she read about them. Two years later she now says “what was the big deal.”

What is “wrong” with them is the left/government trying to force them on everyone. It is another example of the government forcing a solution where there wasn’t a problem.


16 posted on 01/18/2011 12:21:23 PM PST by Brookhaven (Moderates = non-thinkers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NavyCanDo
Do they come with the multi-page, 8pt type EPA document on how to dispose of these mercury bombs properly?

What a crock.

Skip the CFLs and find out why all of a sudden LEDs are so fricken expensive. They were a lot less expensive until the communists in Washington decided to ban incandescent bulbs. LEDs are cheap to manufacture in large numbers. They can easily be designed into modern fixtures. Then can easily be made to have the same color temperature as incandescent light bulbs or any other color temperature the consumer may desire.

They use LESS energy than CFLs and they last longer.

Why, other than we have government morons (redundant I know), pushing a polluting technology? If they had any common sense they would be looking at LEDs. I would be willing to bet the scum pushing this in Washington have some CFL plant in their voting district.

17 posted on 01/18/2011 12:22:47 PM PST by Wurlitzer (Welcome to the new USSA (United Socialist States of Amerika))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NavyCanDo

Of all the energy saving creations ever invented, the most repulsive is the odious low flow shower head.


18 posted on 01/18/2011 12:24:19 PM PST by libstripper (uite eff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NavyCanDo

TANSTAAFL.


19 posted on 01/18/2011 12:28:27 PM PST by mrmeyer ("When brute force is on the march, compromise is the red carpet." Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blueflag

About 2/3 of the bulbs in my house are cfls. I don’t know about their power consumption during warmup but do know that they start out dim and brighten up. My big reason for installing them, and, IMHO, the really big reason for businesses to install them, is their far longer life than incandescents, meaning far less labor gets used changing burned out bulbs.


20 posted on 01/18/2011 12:29:23 PM PST by libstripper (uite eff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson