Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[CALIFORNIA STATE] COURT INVALIDATES UNCONSTITUTIONAL AMMUNITION REGULATION STATUTE (AB962)
Calguns Foundation ^ | 1/18/2011 | NA

Posted on 01/18/2011 12:50:03 PM PST by RKV

In a dramatic ruling giving gun owners a win in an National Rifle Association / California Rifle and Pistol (CRPA) Foundation lawsuit, this morning Fresno Superior Court Judge Jeffrey Hamilton ruled that AB 962, the hotly contested statute that would have banned mail order ammunition sales and required all purchases of so called “handgun ammunition” to be registered, was unconstitutionally vague on its face. The Court enjoined enforcement of the statute, so mail order ammunition sales to California can continue unabated, and ammunition sales need not be registered under the law.

The lawsuit was prompted in part by the many objections and questions raised by confused police, ammunition purchasers, and sellers about what ammunition is covered by the new laws created by AB 962. In a highly unusual move that reflects growing law enforcement opposition to ineffective gun control laws, Tehama County Sheriff Clay Parker is the lead plaintiff in the lawsuit. Other plaintiffs include the CRPA Foundation, Herb Bauer Sporting Goods, ammunition shipper Able’s Ammo, collectible ammunition shipper RTG Sporting Collectibles, and individual Steven Stonecipher. Mendocino Sheriff Tom Allman also supported the lawsuit.

The ruling comes just days before the portion of the law that bans mail order sales of so called “handgun ammunition” was set to take effect on February 1, 2011. The lawsuit, Parker v. California is funded exclusively by the NRA and the CRPA Foundation. If it had gone into effect, AB 962 would have imposed burdensome and ill conceived restrictions on the sales of ammunition. AB 962 required that “handgun ammunition” be stored out of the reach of customers, that ammunition vendors collect ammunition sales registration information and thumb-prints from purchasers, and conduct transactions face-to-face for all deliveries and transfers of “handgun ammunition.” The lawsuit successfully sought the declaration from the Court that the statute was unconstitutional, and successfully sought the injunctive relief prohibiting law enforcement from enforcing the new laws.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: ab962; bang; banglist; calegislation; guns; lawsuit; nra; ruling; scoc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last
To: RKV

Oh no! The streets will flow with blood...


41 posted on 01/18/2011 8:05:01 PM PST by Blue Collar Christian (Be instrumental in the REVIVAL that will heal our land. ><BCC>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
couldn’t agree among themselves on what constituted..

That's why the language of AB 2358 resorted to the undefined "list attached" which made 2358 vulnerable to the same "vagueness" attack.

If and when the legislature can come up with a list of cartridges "principally" used in handguns, then the courts can get on with the constitutional merits of the several matters contained in 962.

42 posted on 01/19/2011 5:51:18 PM PST by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: RKV

This is good news especially for those of us who do Cowboy Action shooting and have antique firearms as black powder cartridges cannot be found anywhere but online.

Yes, I reload, but .38 S&W and 44-40 bullets and cases are difficult to find.


43 posted on 01/19/2011 7:27:57 PM PST by Inyo-Mono (Had God not driven man from the Garden of Eden the Sierra Club surely would have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RKV; Ernest_at_the_Beach; goldstategop; CAluvdubya; CyberAnt; Syncro; Citizen James; BurbankKarl; ..
BUMP & a BANG!
44 posted on 01/21/2011 8:13:28 PM PST by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson