Posted on 01/21/2011 7:32:34 AM PST by IbJensen
It took 10 months of review for Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano to determine that the technological “virtual fence” across our Southwest border was ineffective and too costly. This comes after $1 billion has been spent on the project. Another chapter in the dismal failure of the Obama Administration to secure the border from drug traffickers and terrorists.
Napolitano suspended the project in March and ordered the review, which finally was just completed, The New York Times reported Jan. 14. Expecting criticism, the agency put out documents showing the border patrol was increased from 10,000 in 2004 to 20,500 today. Fewer illegal immigrants are sneaking it, the agency officials also claimed, because 463,000 were detained compared with 724,000 in 2008. No one knows how many weren’t detained. The Secure Border Initiative Network, or SBnet, built by Boeing Corporation, uses cameras, ground sensors and radars so a small number of dispatchers can watch the border on monitors and send Border Patrol agents to the scene. But the rough terrain kept the equipment from functioning 100 percent of the time.
The Government Accountability Office in October found that although Homeland Security had put in place some oversight for reviewing the virtual border installation it “has not effectively implemented other controls” that led to “costly rework” and contributed to SBinet’s …”promised capabilities and benefits on time and within budget,” FoxNews.com reported. In other words Homeland Security bungled the job of keeping Boeing on task.
The contract for the technologically-based fence was signed under the George W, Bush Administration in 2005. The original estimate to cover the 2,000 mile border was $7 billion. Delays and cost overruns have troubled the project. Although the contract with Boeing is expiring, the company noted that Homeland Security officials said they would still use the equipment the company had installed. Napolitano said, in the future, border agents would use less expensive technology already in place for surveillance. It would be fitting for the terrain, she maintained.
Rep. Peter King (R-N.Y.), the new chairman of the Homeland Security Committee in the House, expressed his “serious concerns” about the Administration’s “lack of urgency to secure the border” and was critical of the delays in ending the Boeing program.
Every year, state and federal governments spend about $10 billion to provide welfare to immigrants. Programs include Temporary Aid to Needy Families (TANF), Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF), reduced meal programs in school and public housing, plus Medicaid., according to the Center for Immigration Studies. But the major problem with illegal immigration is drug trafficking and a practically open door for terrorists.
Last April, Arizona aroused the nation when it enacted its law on illegal immigration. It ignited a divisive political war over immigration reform nationally, as The New York Times said. Even before the bill was signed, Obama sharply criticized it. The law allows police to detain anyone not having immigration documents who police believe has committed a crime. Some critics went wild, such as Cardinal Roger Mahony of Los Angeles, who said the authorities to demand documents was like “Nazism.” Many charge racism. This, even though racial profiled is banned in the law. At least nine other states are considering or moving to mirror Arizona’s law.
Meanwhile, Missouri seems to have found the answer. It has no illegals. First in 2007, it passed a law that no one could demand government services who didn’t speak English. The next year, Missouri passed a law requiring highway patrol and other law enforcement officers to verify the immigration status of anyone arrested and inform federal authorities if they were illegal. The same law bars illegal immigrants from taxpayer benefits such as food stamps and health care. In 2009, the state’s institutes of higher learning could not award financial aid to persons there illegally.
Immigration reform is sure to be on the docket in the current 112th Congress. While the United States has always been a melting pot and has been enriched by immigrants, Missouri, the “show me” state, could show the country a thing or two about how to deal with illegal immigration.
May God protect us and may our newly elected politicians work overtime to defund and eliminate the greater part of this evil government!
I don’t see how the virtual fence was a failure of the Obama administration. It was a stupid idea from the beginning and it was proposed by Republicans who didn’t want to give up on cheap labor and pandering to the Mexicans. It was a billion dollar bone tossed out to pacify the raging mob.
We need to deport or imprison ALL illegal aliens, including their anchor babies, seal/secure the border with armed troops, a fence and wall, and have a lethal response to all who would try to re-enter illegally. I am tired of these leeches bleeding my country dry.
The increase in the number of Border Patrol is a smokescreen. What I can’t understand is the media unwillingness to investigate the placement of BP agents on the southern border, the number of vehicles per BP agent, the number of BP agents actually patrolling within five miles of the border, the number of BP agents arrested for criminal activities, the amount of PR and PC effort demanded of agents. The BP is, at least in the lengthy area with which I am quite familiar, is a scandal.
The border fiasco is a scandal; the Homeland Insecurity is a scandal, the entire damned government is a scandal and the United States of America is bankrupt!
Meanwhile, Missouri seems to have found the answer. It has no illegals. First in 2007, it passed a law that no one could demand government services who didn’t speak English. The next year, Missouri passed a law requiring highway patrol and other law enforcement officers to verify the immigration status of anyone arrested and inform federal authorities if they were illegal. The same law bars illegal immigrants from taxpayer benefits such as food stamps and health care. In 2009, the state’s institutes of higher learning could not award financial aid to persons there illegally
Is this true? How is this possible? Are Democrats unaware of this situation? What is Claire McKaskil’s position on this? What does Barack think of this?
You just moan too much don´t you?
Little Janie was just “making a viability test” at the inexpensive sum of US$ 1,000,000,000, for something you Conservatives have DEMANDED... - meaning more security at the border...
Then you moan in, moan in...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.