Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Loughner Indictment
National Review ^ | Andrew c. McCarthy

Posted on 01/21/2011 3:30:39 PM PST by ventanax5

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: ventanax5

President Obama during his acknowledgement to Sheriff Dupa of Pima county at the Wellstone II eshortation stated that Judge Rolls was visiting (implying he was not on Federal business) with the Congresswoman but his staff said he appeared on the podium to articulate about the backlog of deportation court cases, thus on federal business.

When Obama did this he jeprodized the Federal case.
Neat eh ?


21 posted on 01/21/2011 5:13:15 PM PST by mosesdapoet ("To punish a province Let it be ruled by a professor " Frederick The Great paraphrased)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Churchillspirit; shhrubbery!; Verginius Rufus
Heard some lawyer on a radio show say that because Judge Rolls was not acting in his official capacity when he was killed, his murder does not qualify as a federal case.

That's a very good point, Churchillspirit -- and I think it goes beyond that.

I'm not a lawyer, but maybe I should be. When the story about the Federal charges against Loughner was announced and the FBI got involved, I speculated at the time that any Federal charges related to the murder of Judge Roll probably wouldn't stand up to legal scrutiny. Not only was he not acting in his Federal capacity when he was murdered . . . but the Federal prosecutor would have a very hard time proving that Loughner even knew who Roll was -- and what his Federal position was -- at the time of the murder.

I would assume that the same holds true for Gabe Zimmerman, too.

22 posted on 01/21/2011 5:17:29 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("If you touch my junk, I'm gonna have you arrested.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: True Republican Patriot
Judge Rollis a Federal Judge! Who the Hell is Holder or his minions to discount that Judge Roll was there in His Federal Capacities!!

Loughner was charged with Judge Roll's murder upon being taken into federal custody, but they dropped that charge from the indictment. I have no problem with that - if Congresswoman Giffords had been shot while pushing a shopping cart inside that Safeway (instead of at an organized event), it'd be difficult to say she was injured during the course and scope of her duties.

I don't think this is about Democrats vs. Republicans; it's about the U.S. Attorney not looking incompetent when the defense gets charges dismissed. Let the State of Arizona run a concurrent prosecution - it's the way the system is supposed to work.

23 posted on 01/21/2011 5:18:51 PM PST by Charles Martel (Endeavor to persevere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ventanax5

Looks like this case isn’t nearly as cut and dried as they are letting everyone think:

http://www.kgun9.com/global/story.asp?s=13881188

“Why no murder indictments in mass shooting case?

“....he’s only formally indicted for trying to kill[ Gabrielle Giffords and two of her aides. ...

“There are plenty of witnesses ready to say they saw Jared Loughner empty his gun into the crowd at the Safeway.
[Oh yeah?  Name one.]
       
“Investigators say they have high resolution video showing him killing Federal Judge John Roll.  ...
[’Cept no one gets to see it.]

“So far there’s no murder charge, Federal or state. ...

“Both Storts and Piccarreta think any trials will be years away.... .”
[By which time Loughner will have been totally ‘broken’ and will be begging to plead guilty.  So much for the right to a speedy trial.]


24 posted on 01/21/2011 5:21:30 PM PST by starvosan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charles Martel

My only point is that when You accept the Mantel of a Major Federal Official, You are at work or On Call 24/7! Even if Congressman Giffords was pushing a shopping cart, this flamin madman didn’t care,he only went there because it was known she would be there! If he wanted to kill her in her “Official Capacity!” Why did he murder the innocent 9 year old, or the Judge, or slaughter all the rest there that day?


25 posted on 01/21/2011 5:31:51 PM PST by True Republican Patriot (May GOD Continue to BLESS Our Greatest President :George W. Bush!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: True Republican Patriot

Judge Roll just didn’t fit the MSM’s “Tea Party Murderer” meme.


26 posted on 01/21/2011 6:03:04 PM PST by 6SJ7 (atlasShruggedInd = TRUE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: mosesdapoet
Interesting point about why Judge Roll was there.

Maybe Obama jeopardized the case unintentionally--you can't expect him to know all the fine points of the law. Of course he did go to Harvard Law School, but that was just to burnish his credentials as a community organizer.

If Holder doesn't have to bother with any cases other than the Congresswoman's, that will give him more time to work on how to make Sarah and Rush accessories to the murders.

27 posted on 01/21/2011 6:22:09 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus

Obama knew what he was doing. Let’s not let him get away with it.
If you watched the exhortations and remembered the FOX report on any future FR postings about Judge Roll feel free to remind others.


28 posted on 01/21/2011 6:34:58 PM PST by mosesdapoet ("To punish a province Let it be ruled by a professor " Frederick The Great paraphrased)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian
“More than 250 federal agents and 130 local detectives have conducted more than 300 interviews to determine the facts.“

Taxpayer money bonfire! Whoo-Hoo!

29 posted on 01/21/2011 8:04:51 PM PST by kiryandil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: starvosan

I’m beginning to think this case may be the death of the video stoplight ticket. If they have this all on video, and they STILL need hundreds of LEOs to interview the witnesses [“More than 250 federal agents and 130 local detectives have conducted more than 300 interviews to determine the facts“], then your video is junk, lawdog...


30 posted on 01/21/2011 8:12:46 PM PST by kiryandil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

80 hours x $30/hr x 375 LEOs = ~$900,000

$46 per diem x 14 days x 250 Federal LEOs = ~$160,000

Over a million smackers just on this numbers crunch. Good thing the country's not broke...

Party on, Garth!

31 posted on 01/21/2011 8:20:07 PM PST by kiryandil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: mosesdapoet
If it was in his prepared remarks it must have been calculated.

Very little attention has been given to the judge who was killed, and even less to the fact that he saved the life of one of hte other people there by acting as a human shield.

32 posted on 01/22/2011 1:00:35 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson