Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:
Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.
Posted on 01/22/2011 1:26:55 PM PST by MintyHippo1980
WASHINGTON (AP) -- President Barack Obama is marking the 38th anniversary of the Supreme Court's landmark decision on abortion by calling the procedure a constitutional right he's committed to protecting...
(Excerpt) Read more at hosted.ap.org ...
Obama is probably in there dressing out a recent kill for his evening dinner.
How can God bless a country that sanctions the killing of babies??? The supporters and promoters of abortion will have to answer for their words and deeds someday...
“Obama marks anniversary of abortion rights case”
Sick...marking a anniversary of ripping to death a little helpless baby....we do more to protect are wild life then we do our humans.
Just remember “If it isn’t a baby, you aren’t pregnant.”
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:
Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.
“The supporters and promoters of abortion will have to answer for their words and deeds someday”
As will those who failed to stop it.
God doesn’t grade on a curve.
Did he have a jar of baby feet on his desk? Maybe like the Philly abortion hero who was busy “snipping” the spinal columns of live births (mostly of black children)...and also, alas, somebody who can claim African ancestry.
Which apparently is the only "private family matter" that he doesn't wish to intrude upon.
No words can completely describe my loathing of this man...
Roe v Wade: FULL Text (The Decision that wiped out an entire Generation 33 years ago today)(2006)
(If you get an error message that says the article is currently offline refresh the page several times and it should finally download.)
More than anything else 0bozo has said that shows how little he cares or knows about the Constitution and the principles it was founded upon.
Our Constitution was based on the principles expressed in the DoI and proceeds from that. It was not based on popular consensus or secular philosophies of law. Here are the relevant passages that define the direction and purpose of the Constitution.
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, ..."
The principles of Constitutional law are right there.
~"all men are created equal"~ Religion and science agree that 'men' are created at conception.
~"with certain unalienable rights"~ Rights that exist whether they are recognized by government or not and cannot be taken away or given away.
~"that among these are Life, ..."~ Life is an unalienable right to be protected and the two, life and rights, arise together created as one.
~"That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, ..."~ There you have the only principle set forth, by our Founding documents, for instituting a government which is a set of secular laws. Government is not established on the basis of protecting secular laws and vague legal concepts like 'personhood.' Its sole purpose is to protect our rights.
If secular law defines things empirically then why would it ignore the empirical findings of science? The fact that life, completely and uniquely individual life, begins at conception is beyond scientific theory. It's an established observable irrefutable scientific fact.
Since both religious and scientific views agree that life begins at conception what system of thought and logic is secular law founded on that defines a "person" differently? It clearly does not come from any religious view. It does not come from any scientific view. It has no basis in our Founding principles and it has no basis in secular law, which is supposed to follow those principles, other than the arbitrary decision of Roe v. Wade.
Where does 0bama come up with this "fundamental principle?" Fundamental to what?
But it’s fine to take other ‘public’ taxpayer’s dollars to pay for the consequences of actions due to those ‘private family matters’.
53 Million Unborn...dead...I’d call it what it is GENOCIDE of the Unborn.
Abortion is the issue that turned me against the left, and made me a conservative. It’s very sad to see the leader of the free world commemorating a court decision that is responsible for the death of 53 million fellow Americans.
Better phrased, more accurately phrased that is,
“Obama and his ABCNNBCBS supporters celebrate enthusiastically anniversary of abortion rights case”
Lest we forget, this wicked bastard worked to protect aborticutionists who kill already born infants by withholding any medical attention from the struggling little ones. A man that wicked is so dead of soul that nothing he does should be shocking to those who see what he is and whom is his father. Barry the bastards spiritual father was a murderer from the start. A man of profound wickedness now directs the destiny of America ... chosen to do so by a majority of the voting sovereigns of that nation. May God have mercy upon us ...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.