Posted on 01/24/2011 10:29:58 AM PST by SeekAndFind
An appellate court has ruled that Rahm Emanuel is not legally a resident of Chicago, and therefore cannot run for mayor. The decision overturns a previous ruling.
“We conclude that the candidate neither meets the the municipal code’s requirement that he have ‘resided’ in Chicago for the year preceding the election in which he seeks to participate nor falls within any exception to the requirement.”
More at the Chicago News Cooperative.
UPDATE: ”The Supreme Court is absolutely loathe to overturn an appellate court decision,” an Illinois lawyer tells Politico’s Ben Smith. I have heard much the same from others familiar with Illinois judiciary — the state supreme court is expected to be even less-friendly to Rahm than was the appellate.
Here’s the ruling.
Just did, yes.
I am curious. I suspect that Daley still holds the power to select his successor. Did the Appellate Court do what Daley wanted them to do, or did they actually decide it on points of law?
If Daley meant to undermine Rahm, as some speculated in the early days, wouldn’t he have done it with that first Chicago judge?
I suspect that Daley still tells Obama what to do, rather than the reverse.
Maybe we can get the court to review a certain pResident’s status.
Not true-they are using the same ruling MI is, in keeping me from claiming residency even though I own two houses there. I haven’t lived there for 5 years. 2 years ago a County Treasurer found out i was renting the homes and denied my Homestead Exemption, even though a friend is renting one of the houses and I am back there frequently.
Ok, that made me laugh.
No kidding, he isn’t a resident of Chicago. He hasn’t been for several years.
He will still try for a write-in candidacy and likely win with all the shenanigans that go on with Chicago politics.
This doesn’t matter, he doesn’t even need to be on the ballot. If certain “people” want him to be mayor, he WILL be mayor.
Wouldn’t that be lovely.
This just means other miserable Rat will take the mayorship, so no big difference.
Well! The little fella is sure to be in full attack gerbil mode over this!
Wow——just read that Alec Baldwin being investigated for tax evasion and now this. This day is turning out OK after all..
Um the law clearly states that you must be a resident of the city 1 full year before the election.
Maybe you didn’t know Rahm was living in DC. And working for Obama. In fact he amended his tax returns when he decided to run for Mayor to state that he was a fulltime resident of the city.
This court actually read the letter of the law and applied it.
LOL!
Rahm broke both the letter AND the spirit of the law.
Now if we could see the same kind of thing happen with Obowma's BC...
Since these are State courts then it pays to remember that the judges are going to rule in favor of the pols who appointed them.
It wouldn't matter. He's been found ineligible for the Office at all. A write in campaign would be a futile move. They wouldn't even count the votes.
I..am..SHOCKED.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.