Posted on 1/26/2011, 4:53:45 PM by FreeAtlanta
A friend of Hawaii Governor Neil Abercrombie (D) says that the governor told him: "There is no Barack Obama birth certificate in Hawaii, absolutely no proof at all that Obama was born in Hawaii." This should keep the "birther" story alive for yet another week. We'll provide a slide show shortly to bring you up to date on all the action.
(Excerpt) Read more at businessinsider.com ...
This whole eligibility thing: "nobody goes there anymore; it's too crowded." Plus brocko is on his home field in Hawaii; "he knows every crook and nanny in the place." In short, I think he saw a fork in the road, and took it.
Thank you. I think a lot of people here at FR are in the same boat. It’s an awful feeling having to hope that the people who CAN have an impact will actually get around to doing it. I didn’t get around to it in time for Nebraska, in spite of all the work I’ve done on this issue. I was distracted by the Tucson shooting. It happens so easily.
I feel like somebody who fouled out of the basketball game and so is desperately cheering on my team from the bench.
It’s all you or I can do, but at least we’re happy to be able to do that. =)
I hope everybody who is being “urged” (lol. That’s my daughter’s term for when she bosses her siblings around) to act on this feels it as the cheering that it is. We’re a team, and together we can do this.
Right now it looks like Arizona may be making headway. I really do hope somebody requires the transaction logs for birth and citizenship records to be disclosed as well. The more I look at the way the Abercrombie thing unfolded, the more I think this IS a plan to open the door for a forged birth certificate to be presented, and we need to protect ourselves against that. Requiring citizenship records should also open up Obama’s passport file - which we KNOW has been illegally accessed at least 3 times.
Sounds like the really good thing about the AZ bill that’s just been proposed is that it requires the dual citizenship issue to be addressed, which means that the bill will certainly be challenged in court.
Very interesting that the guy in the 9th Circuit who would be most likely to hear the case and rule in a Constitutionally-compliant way is Judge John Roll, who was shot by a bullet to the aorta on Jan 8th.
Is that you Michael Medved?
*shrug* he's too slimy to be a reptile...
Man Made Global Warming is another example.
AGW=Al Gore Warming
Because he invented it. He invented the internet too ya know. If the nobel peace prize wasn’t rigged, algore would have way more than one of them.
Yeah, but that might be enough to handily defeat the usurper and wipe out the Democrat/Socialist party.
(Some great government we have when our "leaders" denounce and ridicule the populace, eh?)
They will seek to marginalize anyone who brings up the subject.
BUT. The question is still valid, and we should boldly make our challenges.
"Who are you and where were you born?" is NOT a trivial question for the POTUS, and we have a president who refuses to answer.
I’m afraid that obama’s people have already made plans to go around this issue. In early 2010 obama supporters got Hawaii to quietly declare the Hawaiian short forms “ legal” for proof of place of birth and back dated it to include obama’s “certificate”. obama may be a thief , crook, lair and a common criminal, but he is not a fool. He is also not the legal President of the United States.
Ellis should look up Obozo’s ass for the certificate! He’s already got his tongue in there!
all that needs to happen is 1 state pass a law that requires a candidate on the ballot in that state’s presidential election to verify birthplace and age in order to appear on that state’s ballot.
Now THAT is a WINNING idea! It’s PROACTIVE! It avoids the biased courts. There are already at least 5 states considering the Legislation! Of course, the Federal Courts will try to rule it Unconstitutional. But at this point, that would probably set off a Constitutional Crisis. GOOD ENOUGH. I AGREE. If a State requires it, candidates have NO CHOICE but to produce it. If they won’t, they aren’t going on ANY ballot.
Print out and send snail mail, or copy and paste into an e-mail to your congresscritter, who’s SALARY YOU PAY!
http://butterdezillion.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/final-short-form-eligibility-bill1.pdf
Why would you want it to die? You don’t believe people should always question authority? What is so wrong about a true citizen of America wanting to see the Constitutional mandate necessary to become President? Are you anti-freedom and anti-Liberty?
The definition of “irrational” is believing something with no basis for that belief.
It is IRRATIONAL to believe 0bama was born in Hawaii.
It is RATIONAL to believe there is no proof that he was.
That is a very good analogy.
It takes a lot to break through to the dumbed down masses that they are being victimized by “The Big Lie”.
“I feel like somebody who fouled out of the basketball game and so is desperately cheering on my team from the bench.”
What we can ALL do if we are within reach of a phone or a computer is encourage our friends and encourage our state legislators getting the ball rolling to pass state legislation for all candidates on ballots to provide legislation forcing all Presidential primary contenders to prove with their (and parents?) notarized documents proving eligibility.
The truth is as simple as it appears. He is hiding something embarrassing.
In any event, ALL would be cleared up if a number of states just passed laws requiring ALL presidential candidates submit long form birth certificates as PROOF of citizenship and Constitutional qualification for office. Problem solved, case closed. :-)
Are you sure? I would think that ‘irrational’ means believing something in spite of clear evidence it is not true. It is ‘nonrational’ to believe something for which there is no evidence.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.