Skip to comments.Judge Declares Pro-Abortion ObamaCare Unconstitutional
Posted on 01/31/2011 12:44:14 PM PST by julieee
Judge Declares Pro-Abortion ObamaCare Unconstitutional
A federal judge in Florida has issued a new ruling in what is the largest lawsuit filed against the Obamacare health care law. U.S. District Judge Roger Vinson says the individual mandate is unconstitutional and, therefore, the entire law is as well.
Leading pro-life groups have opposed the Obamcare law because it allows massive abortion funding and prompts concerns about rationing of health care.
(Excerpt) Read more at lifenews.com ...
Yiiii Haaaaaaa !!!
This is great! And now please tell me how it can possibly be constitutional for the Federal Government to force us to buy into Medicare when we turn 65?
Headline is misleading.
I’m TOTALLY on the side of the folks at LifeNews, but
the law wasn’t ruled unconstititional because it is pro-abortion.
HA HA HA Poked him in the eye with a stick.
Now we need to send the Poser back to Kenya.
I agree the headline is a stretch. However they didnt say it was because of that, merely described the law as unconstitutional.
No one that I am aware of MUST enroll in Medicare at 65.
This is just the tip of the iceberg. I heard Trump talking about making our enemies(China) pay up to 25% tariff if they don’t stop messing with their currency and kepping our goods out of their country. Now if we could just get the feds out of everything else they are not supposed to be doing we might get this great country of ours back on track. Let’s get back to the Constitution!
Yes, that’s what about 300 folks at a retirement seminar thought. But we were all told that at 65 you must sign up for Medicare, that’s everyone!
No, but the Administration thinks that it can hold your Social Security payments hostage in order to force you to enroll in Medicare:
That which is not Constitutional has been sterilized!
That may be if you want to rely on medicare... but I don’t know how it works sooo... with a grain of salt...
>>Im TOTALLY on the side of the folks at LifeNews, but
the law wasnt ruled unconstititional because it is pro-abortion.<<
Yeah, it’s a biased title. It’s like saying a pro-life advocate won the lottery. the stand on abortion is completely irrelevant to the story.
But, to be fair to the source, it IS the organization’s reason for existence, and the law WAS pro-government financed abortion, so it does have some relevance to the organization reporting it.
..causing liberal heads to explode all over the nation, this day, Jan 31, 2011!
It was amazing, since the room was filled with socialist democrat state workers. No one could believe it. But we were assured that you must enroll in Medicare 3 months before your 65th birthday or you will be penialized. Everyone was surprised, even though they love everything socialist.
Oh yes I will have my regular insurance but I was told that I must sign up for Medicare also.
Now, if we could just get one with enough balls to declare OBAMA Unconstitutional, we’d be doing ok.
Not saying I agree, but the argument is that medicare is a tax on EVERYONE and not a penalty for those that don’t buy something.
Had the government pushed single payer then they may have won.
Now that's the kind of Change we voted for!!!
Well, you and I should both agree that the Federal government has no constitutional business in medical care at all. If the Commerce Clause trumps everything else in the constitution then we have no more constitution, effectively. Don’t you agree?
I agree. Federal government as very little business in most everything we do; however, the reality is that we are the minority in that opinion and we need to start to influence others to think like us. AND appoint federal judges who agree with us as well.
Who’s the Iron Duke?
Hold on. Give the GOP some time to screw this up.
They need to continue to defund and overturn every piece of this monstrosity.
It wasn’t Medicare. It was your Health Insurance Company that required it to reduce costs to them. You could cancel your private health insurance and still keep your hospital insurance under Medicare. Your private insurance co. will pay for things not covered by Medicare. It’s best to contact Medicare or your private insurance co
Next up...the lawsuit against AZ.
Golly gee, you mean they lied to me! Thanks for the heads up. I don’t feel like having healthinsurance anyway. I’m 62 and in better health than I have been in a long time since I took things into my own hands. Cut the carbs, take suppliments and drink beer! You’ll live longer. Most guys my age are on blood pressure meds and are told not to drink. If they cut the carbs completely, almost, they would reverse the hardinging of their arteries. It’s called glycation, look it up!
Yep, they lied to you but if you only accepted Part A (hospitalization), you’re O.K. You’ve already paid for that through payroll tax. If you want B,C and D, I think you pay a premium.
Your health-maintenance philosophy sounds good—particularly the beer part.
the law wasnt ruled unconstititional because it is pro-abortion.
Maybe not, but it sure adds sweetness in it for me. Yeeeeehaaaaaaaaa! Woooooooohooooooooand and Amen.
julieee only posts right to life articles from lifenews.com and never comments on anything.
The judge is OBVIOUSLY racist! /s
omg... that’s horrendous... ready to take the red pill and unplug from the matrix...
BTW, when you're hospitalized there is an initial deductable which amounts to several hundred dollars that a private ins. co. should cover. Contact them and find out how much before dropping them.
Get it in writing!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.