Is it correct that there aren’t enough Republican votes to repeal it, and, even if there were, Obumble could veto it?
^^^ What we have here... this right here... ^^^ is a perfect example of negative defeatist thinking.
Can't never did anything.
This is true [wait for the but monkey] unless enough Dems vote for repeal and then there would need to be even more cross-overs to override a veto ...
BUT
If the [key phrase] Will of the People as expressed by a vote of both Houses says repeal, can Obama veto it in light of all his rhetoric about the will of the Egyptian people??? He is ironically vulnerable there ... although the MSM will spin like crazy to cover for him.
To answer your question as simply as possible, yes.
Yes, if the Senate passed it by some miracle, they would not have the votes to over-ride zero’s veto.
Yes that is correct. However, banging the repeal of Onadacare drum in the House makes the Dems defend it. It is essential to the ultimate repeal of this travesty that the dialog not be allowed to languish. It will also, along with Onada’s disastrous energy and economic policies, set the table for the 2012 Senate and presidential elections.
The Usurping Marxist Onada and his band of angry commies will be trying anything to divert voter’s attention from those topics. We’ve already seen how they tried to use the AZ shooting to redirect the voter’s attention to guns—again.
Current Mid-East turmoil will also be used by Onada and his propaganda organs to avoid talking about Onadacare and his energy/economic policies. I’m somewhat hopeful that Egypt will get a grip on itself. Mubarak may have to do some bobbing and weaving, but so far only about 250,000 Egyptians have been involved in the demonstrations in that country. I’m not sure the so-called unrest extends beyond Cairo. With a 20 million or so population, 250,000 demonstrators hardly represent the majority of Egyptians.
It remains to be seen whether or not the Muslim Brotherhood can sustain—let alone enlarge—its move to destabilize the Mid-East.