Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Palin snubbed CPAC
politico ^ | Updated: 2/3/11 2:04 PM EST | Andy Barr

Posted on 02/03/2011 12:27:59 PM PST by onyx

The news that Sarah Palin won’t be attending CPAC next week doesn’t come as much surprise. For those keeping score, she’s now been invited three times — and said no thanks each time.

A Palin aide did not immediately return a request to explain why, but her reasoning is pretty evident.

A Palin source bashed CPAC and its leader David Keene in an interview last year with POLITICO announcing that the former governor wouldn’t be attending – even though CPAC had listed her as an invited guest for the second year in a row. The source called the annual gathering an example "special interests over core beliefs" and "pocketbook over policy."

"That's not what CPAC should be about and people are tiring," the source said. "Palin is taking a stance against this just as she did in Alaska."

The criticism of CPAC was fueled by a report that David Keene, president of the American Conservative Union, had asked FedEx for between $2 million and $3 million to get the group's support in a bitter battle on Capitol Hill with rival UPS. This was not the first reported allegation of Keene selling his influence with the conservative base, and is a large part of the reason why the ACU and its annual conference have waned in influence over the years.

The previous year, Palin’s camp and CPAC feuded over them listing her as a speaker at the conference despite the fact that she had not confirmed.

And Keene fueled the squabble between the two camps two years ago, when he told Newsmax that Palin was “whining” about negative press coverage.

Add the personal drama to the fact that several other conservatives – including Jim DeMint and Marco Rubio – are skipping the conference this year, and it’s pretty clear that Palin showing up was never in the cards.



TOPICS: Extended News; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: acu; cpac; cpacsnubbed; davidkeene; muslimbrotherhood; palin; sarahpalin; smellthefear; waronsarah; whenrinosattack
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-194 next last

Palin showing up was never in the cards!


1 posted on 02/03/2011 12:28:05 PM PST by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: onyx

There is no C in CPAC..............


2 posted on 02/03/2011 12:29:15 PM PST by Red Badger (Whenever these vermin call you an 'idiot', you can be sure that you are doing something right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1_Rain_Drop; 4woodenboats; 6323cd; Abbeville Conservative; abigail2; ABQHispConservative; ...
“A nightstick the size of a telephone pole and the muscle to wield it effortlessly.”
SARAH PALIN'S PING LIST



3 posted on 02/03/2011 12:29:46 PM PST by onyx (If you truly support Sarah Palin and want to be on her busy ping list, let me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx

I thought she couldn’t fit them in her schedule. She’s a busy person you know. What snubbing?


4 posted on 02/03/2011 12:30:10 PM PST by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx
The news that Sarah Palin won’t be attending CPAC next week doesn’t come as much surprise. For those keeping score, she’s now been invited three times — and said no thanks each time....The source called the annual gathering an example [of] "special interests over core beliefs" and "pocketbook over policy." "That's not what CPAC should be about and people are tiring," the source said.

Ping for later

5 posted on 02/03/2011 12:31:57 PM PST by Alex Murphy ("Posting news feeds, making eyes bleed, he's hated on seven continents")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Exactly that is our “teachable lesson” (of the year): that CPAC is just another vehicle for the beltway RINO establishment~.


6 posted on 02/03/2011 12:32:36 PM PST by JSDude1 (December 18, 2010 the Day the radical homosexual left declared WAR on the US Military.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 4rcane

Sarah done good...as usual. Please, Lord, let us get through these days of darkness.


7 posted on 02/03/2011 12:33:46 PM PST by MestaMachine (Note: I never capitalize anything I don't respect. Like obama and/or islam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: onyx
The criticism of CPAC was fueled by a report that David Keene, president of the American Conservative Union, had asked FedEx for between $2 million and $3 million to get the group's support in a bitter battle on Capitol Hill with rival UPS

THAT crook is still running the place? Now its even morally corrupt

8 posted on 02/03/2011 12:34:15 PM PST by GeronL (http://www.stink-eye.net/forum/index.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Years ago CPAC was IT...it is so dead now, just a bunch of trust fund squishy youth running around..selling their straw poll vote to the candidate that will buy them the most drinks..


9 posted on 02/03/2011 12:35:10 PM PST by Fred (Suspend All Immigration Until Unemployment is Reduced to 5%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Sarah Palin is amazing I’m talking conviction here. I can’t wait until she announces her run (I hope).


10 posted on 02/03/2011 12:39:44 PM PST by Rappini (Pro Deo et Patria)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Yes, they should just change it to whatever-PAC.


11 posted on 02/03/2011 12:46:59 PM PST by Persevero (Homeschooling for Excellence since 1992)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: onyx
And ... why not snub "C"PAC???
It is, after all, CINO
© -- Conservative In Name Only

12 posted on 02/03/2011 12:53:11 PM PST by vox_freedom (America is being tested as never before in its history. May God help us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Dang. I went to CPAC three times back in the 1990's. Back then, it really was cool.

I guess that I am not missing much now.

13 posted on 02/03/2011 12:54:19 PM PST by Lysandru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx
The source called the annual gathering an example "special interests over core beliefs" and "pocketbook over policy."

Sarah stands by her principles and core beliefs. Not sound bites and statements to gather votes.

14 posted on 02/03/2011 12:55:16 PM PST by RedMDer (restoration of our honor, dignity, and freedoms will save America. - Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Perhaps Palin doesn’t like the Muslim Brotherhood takeover of CPAC and the ACU.


15 posted on 02/03/2011 12:55:39 PM PST by montag813 (http://www.facebook.com/StandWithArizona)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx; All
David Keene Exposed. Scroll down to the middle of the page for a more than contentious interview.

http://johnziegler.com/

16 posted on 02/03/2011 12:55:51 PM PST by Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Interesting that SarahPAC is listed as a co-sponsors of the Presidential Diamond Reception.


17 posted on 02/03/2011 12:59:46 PM PST by justsaynomore ("We the people are still in charge of this country!" - Herman Cain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Tell ‘em to drop the fags.

As a first step.


18 posted on 02/03/2011 1:14:16 PM PST by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx
Smart move by Sarah. CPAC is hardly conservative any more and why support corrupt scum like David Keene and Grover Norquest.
19 posted on 02/03/2011 1:15:56 PM PST by bwc2221 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Where is pissant to scream that Sarah is too liberal after this?


20 posted on 02/03/2011 1:17:32 PM PST by DaxtonBrown (HARRY: Money Mob & Influence (See my Expose on Reid on amazon.com written by me!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-194 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson