Don't show too much intelligence in your complaints to your overlords, they may decide to punish you.
To: antiRepublicrat
"Cox has not been accused of claiming that he is an engineer. But Lacy says he filed the complaint because the report "appears to be engineering-level work" by someone who is not licensed as a professional engineer. God forbid you could ever do skilled work, without a license.
Overlords indeed.
2 posted on
02/03/2011 1:42:43 PM PST by
sionnsar
(IranAzadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5:SONY|Why are TSA exempt from their own searches?)
To: antiRepublicrat
Andrew L. Ritter, executive director of the engineers licensing board, said it will take three or four months to investigate Lacy's allegation against Cox. He said there is a potential for violation if DOT and the public were misled by "engineering-quality work"- even if the authors did not claim to be engineers. If you don't do it in crayon you are subject to arrest.
4 posted on
02/03/2011 1:45:50 PM PST by
KarlInOhio
(Washington is finally rid of the Kennedies. Free at last, thank God almighty we are free at last.)
To: antiRepublicrat
So in a nutshell, a really smart guy put together really good plans on how a red light was needed at an intersection. The plans were so good they looked like they were done by a licensed engineer, so now the city is going after the man because he did such good work but is not a licensed engineer.
5 posted on
02/03/2011 1:46:33 PM PST by
icwhatudo
("laws requiring compulsory abortion could be sustained under the constitution"-Obama official)
To: antiRepublicrat
Why does the state have the right to "license" engineers anyway?
There are national boards that prove their qualifications.
The ONLY reason for the state to "license" any professional is so they can take some of their money.
6 posted on
02/03/2011 1:47:01 PM PST by
E. Pluribus Unum
("If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun." -- Barry Soetoro, June 11, 2008)
To: antiRepublicrat
Demand that the city engineer be cashiered for malfeasance.
7 posted on
02/03/2011 1:47:53 PM PST by
Seruzawa
(If you agree with the French raise your hand - If you are French raise both hands.)
To: antiRepublicrat
After reading it I scrolled to the top expecting the publication to be The Onion or Scrappleface. I’m stunned.
8 posted on
02/03/2011 1:51:21 PM PST by
RobRoy
(The US Today: Revelation 18:4)
To: antiRepublicrat
The backstory is possibly that an engineer — possibly one connected with a firm that does a lot of work for DOT, or even with the firm that did the DOT’s study in this case — did do the report as a favor for the association. Cox might have put his name on it to preserve the engineer’s anonymity.
Or maybe they just copied the methodology of the DOT’s engineer’s work after sitting around and picking out the flaws over a few beers. A lot of reports like this can be attacked by picking apart the assumptions.
Or maybe they really are that good.
It’s still sick. If I have a heart attack, I sincerely hope that the good samaritan who does the CPR on me is good enough to get cited to the AMA for doing work that resembles the quality of an actual doctor or EMT too closely.
To: antiRepublicrat
The convolution of logic here is beyond the pale. We need a RICO type law for this kind of stuff.
14 posted on
02/03/2011 2:01:09 PM PST by
Free Vulcan
(Vote Republican! You can vote Democrat when you're dead.)
To: antiRepublicrat
This is pure bullshit.
Unless you did the work for compensation that is tangible, no license is required.
To: antiRepublicrat
Ummmmmmmm.............
WTF???!!!!
He's being investigated because he's too smart for his own good!
30 posted on
02/03/2011 5:34:30 PM PST by
starlifter
(Pullum sapit)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson