Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Archaeologists May Have Found Tomb of Prophet Zechariah
AOL ^ | Feb 3, 2011

Posted on 02/03/2011 6:58:03 PM PST by SJackson

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: SJackson
I discovered Prophet Muhammad's tomb.

21 posted on 02/03/2011 8:06:49 PM PST by TSgt (Colonel Allen West & Michele Bachman - 2012 POTUS Dream Team Ticket!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson; Paragon Defender; Godzilla; SZonian; restornu

Paragon and resty
Why can’t we find any artificts from the book of Mormon?
Weekly, we see announcements of real physical evidence of events and people recorded in the Bible. Yet nothing in archeology, DNA, etc. that confirms any claim in the book of Mormon. Why?

This thread demonstrates what physical corroboration looks like.

Best
Ampu


22 posted on 02/03/2011 8:10:44 PM PST by aMorePerfectUnion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Love what you’ve done with the place... mosaic?


23 posted on 02/03/2011 8:24:49 PM PST by Dr.Deth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
<liberal history lesson>Whoa, whoa! What's with the swastika Adolf?

It's right there, in the middle! Was he a Nazi or something?!?!? </liberal teaching of history>

24 posted on 02/03/2011 8:30:12 PM PST by Dr.Deth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Zach’s shack intact! Film at 11!


25 posted on 02/03/2011 8:31:24 PM PST by April Lexington (Study the Constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lightman

Prophet Zechariah.

And there is only one that is “Holy”, and that is God.


26 posted on 02/03/2011 8:38:19 PM PST by kingpins10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: aMorePerfectUnion
Why can’t we find any artifacts from the book of Mormon?

Because they don't exist and never did except in the mind of J. Smith.

27 posted on 02/03/2011 8:39:29 PM PST by Graybeard58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: publana

First they’ll try claiming it’s a mosque.


28 posted on 02/03/2011 8:41:28 PM PST by Slings and Arrows (You can't have Ingsoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: lightman
O Christ our God, come and save us.

I believe that God will come when God will come, and that He would rather have us at the business of living and caring for others.

29 posted on 02/03/2011 10:47:15 PM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC
early Christians took the prohibition against graven images very seriously

The Catacombs of Rome would suggest otherwise.

30 posted on 02/03/2011 10:57:43 PM PST by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC; D-fendr
If I remember right early Christians took the prohibition against graven images very seriously. As a result the decorations in their churches ended up as intricate designs such as those shown here.

The images in the Catacombs were the first to come to my mind. There are also early images in the Christian tombs found in the excavation under St. Peter's Basilica, dating from about the same period.

The "Christ Helios" from the Scavi of St. Peter's:

The mosaic floors of the period would have been more prone to have designs on them simply because it would not be proper to walk upon a holy image. However, the Churches built contemporaneously to this Church that was just found would have had plenty of images - I would point you to the wonderful mosaics of the Churches of Ravenna for just a few examples.

One such image - Christ giving a crown of martyrdom to St. Vitale and a model of the Church of San Vitale to the bishop of Ravenna, from the apse of the church, finished about 550:


31 posted on 02/03/2011 11:51:43 PM PST by GCC Catholic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: GCC Catholic

Beautiful.

Thanks for your post.


32 posted on 02/04/2011 12:02:40 AM PST by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: GCC Catholic
The image in your post inspired me learn more about the Church of San Vitale, and provided more of the magnificent artistry here below. Thanks very much for sharing.


33 posted on 02/04/2011 4:07:54 AM PST by lbryce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC

People who bring an agenda to the most casual discussion are really funny, in a “wake me up when they leave” sorta way.


34 posted on 02/04/2011 4:49:58 AM PST by Tax-chick (We don't like original material, unless it's been done before.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: aMorePerfectUnion; SJackson; Godzilla; SZonian; restornu

Why can’t we find any artificts from the book of Mormon?
Weekly, we see announcements of real physical evidence of events and people recorded in the Bible. Yet nothing in archeology, DNA, etc. that confirms any claim in the book of Mormon. Why?


Your non-issues are addressed at the links provided. As usual. Day in and day out. The anti-Mormon propaganda gang has nothing of substance.


35 posted on 02/04/2011 5:30:27 AM PST by Paragon Defender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Paragon Defender; aMorePerfectUnion; All

AMPU ignored the operative word “MAY”!

BTW many of the manuscripts of the Bible are over 3000- 5000 years old most of what has been found is copies of copies for the OT and much of the arctic facts has only been showing up in the late 1800’s after the coming forth of the Book of Mormon.

There has been more revenue invested in the Middle East than in South America

At least if one is sincere they would strive to remember to put things in perspective.

Maybe the anti should not be so quick to dismiss when in the title “it is believe” or “may have found” shows up when the Book of Mormon sites are located.

Also it is well know when sites of the Bible were located there was the obstacle of various factions such as secular politics involved to suppress truth and it is continues as well in the digs for the Book of Mormon.


36 posted on 02/04/2011 6:22:33 AM PST by restornu (Geez wrangling with the mighty dirty diddies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Paragon Defender
Your non-issues are addressed at the links provided. As usual. Day in and day out.

Where are the links to the nephite exhibit at the Smithsonian?

37 posted on 02/04/2011 8:06:07 AM PST by Godzilla (3-7-77)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: restornu
and much of the arctic facts has only been showing up in the late 1800’s after the coming forth of the Book of Mormon.

So where are the alledged 'gold plates' resty

There has been more revenue invested in the Middle East than in South America

BYU has devoted and entire department to the search - plus they can build upon other researchers, pretty lame excuse

At least if one is sincere they would strive to remember to put things in perspective.

And have the most humble pumpkin patch too.

Maybe the anti should not be so quick to dismiss when in the title “it is believe” or “may have found” shows up when the Book of Mormon sites are located.

Maybe mormons should not be so quick to believe these faith increasing stories. May be you can provide the link to the nephite exhibit in the Smithsonian.

Also it is well know when sites of the Bible were located there was the obstacle of various factions such as secular politics involved to suppress truth and it is continues as well in the digs for the Book of Mormon.

You need to wash that hog resty.

38 posted on 02/04/2011 8:09:52 AM PST by Godzilla (3-7-77)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: restornu

“AMPU ignored the operative word “MAY”!”

No, sorry resty. I saw it. Let’s be frank though, mormonism
can’t even point out a real artifact.

“BTW many of the manuscripts of the Bible are over 3000- 5000 years old most of what has been found is copies of copies for the OT and much of the arctic facts has only been showing up in the late 1800’s after the coming forth of the Book of Mormon.”

You may want to review real history of archeology before
you make wild claims. The book of mormon neither started
nor added to the archeological efforts in the Holy Land.

Despite the publication of the book of mormon, not a single
artifact has been unearthed in America that can verify
any of the wild claims of the book of mormon.

“There has been more revenue invested in the Middle East than in South America”

Oh, that’s the excuse, huh? Reread the cultic mormon literature and you will see there were supposedly large cities from coast to coast! You should trip over the
metalworks, foundations of buildings and skeletons!

“At least if one is sincere they would strive to remember to put things in perspective.”

I better pitch in and help you here...

“At least if one is feelings-oriented instead of fact oriented, they would strive to ignore the total lack of
mormon facts. We still have our feelings!!!!”

“Maybe the anti should not be so quick to dismiss when in the title “it is believe” or “may have found” shows up when the Book of Mormon sites are located.”

If it is a mormon source, I guarantee it has no bearing
on reality. Never has. Never will. But you have feelings
anyway.

“Also it is well know when sites of the Bible were located there was the obstacle of various factions such as secular politics involved to suppress truth and it is continues as well in the digs for the Book of Mormon.”

Victims! We are mormon victims! They stole our artifacts!!!

I’ve actually heard of mormons saying God hid the artifacts
so you would rely on faith...

bogus.

ampu


39 posted on 02/04/2011 9:54:30 AM PST by aMorePerfectUnion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Paragon Defender

“Your non-issues are addressed at the links provided.”

Not so. There is no information about the lack of support
for any mormon claim. No DNA. No archeology. Zip.


40 posted on 02/04/2011 9:56:01 AM PST by aMorePerfectUnion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson