Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

In Search of the Moderate Muslim World
Frontpagemagazine ^ | February 4, 2011 | Arnold Ahlert

Posted on 02/04/2011 5:34:34 AM PST by SJackson

As the crisis in Egypt continues, Western nations are faced with a conundrum of their own making: how does one simultaneously demand that Arabic nations abandon their “7th century” mentality, best represented by oppressive, often totalitarian regimes, even as one knows the current uprisings against such regimes will likely produce results utterly antithetical to Western interests? At this juncture, perhaps the best the West can hope for is clarity.

For the last ten years, both the Bush administration and the Obama administration have worked mightily to convince the American public that the “overwhelming majority” of Muslims are “on our side” with regards to the global war against terror. Yet if that were truly the case, then why has it been necessary to prop up autocratic regimes throughout the region for decades? With respect to Egyptians, a June 2010 Pew opinion survey reveals a decidedly different set of sensibilities: 59% of Egyptians back Islamists while only 27% back modernizers; there is 50% support for Hamas, 30% for Hezbollah and 20% for al Qaeda. 95% of Egyptians would welcome Islamic influence in their political arena.

If Hosni Mubarak’s removal hands Egypt over to the Muslim Brotherhood, one of the most virulent Islamic terrorist organizations in the world, the Obama administration will be roundly criticized for sitting back and “allowing it to happen.” Already columnists in Israel are characterizing the administration’s wait-and-see policy as a “knife to the back.” Perhaps it is. But in one respect, such a policy is hard to distinguish from that of a Bush administration which sat back and allowed Hamas to gain control of the West Bank via a democratic election. Thus, while one can criticize the current administration for a certain level of naivete regarding reality, the idea that an American administration embraces democracy per se, irrespective of the outcome, is hardly new.

Where both administrations have faltered has to do with the idea of believing that democracy and freedom are interchangeable terms, and that the definition of freedom is a commonly understood concept which cuts across cultural boundaries. If the result of the Egyptian democracy movement results in Muslim Brotherhood gaining control of the government–with acquiescence of the Egyptian people–freedom in the Western sense will be nowhere to be found. If the people willingly trade a secular dictatorship for a religious one, it will be a terrible development for the West in every respect but one:

We will be forced to admit that substantial numbers of Muslims, perhaps even a majority, do not embrace Western values.

Such clarity may be the only bright light in an otherwise darkened sky. If the uprisings occurring in the Middle East result in democratically elected religious tyrannies which openly express their hatred of the United States and their desire to destroy Israel, perhaps those long-deluded into believing ideas such as terrorism is a “law-enforcement problem,” or that massive Muslim emigration into Western countries is little cause for concern, or that Western accommodation to Muslim sensibilities must proceed without hesitation, will be snapped out of their delusion. Perhaps phrases like “man-caused disaster” and “overseas contingency operation” will be tossed on the ash heap of history where they belong. Perhaps an Israel completely surrounded by enemies will awaken Jewish liberals in both countries to the utter bankruptcy of their multicultural and morally relative fantasies.

Perhaps those who have long tut-tutted the idea that we may be in the midst of a civilizational struggle will have the blinders removed from their eyes.

No one in their right mind yearns for a clash of civilizations. But for far too long, Western nations have largely dismissed the idea as neo-con warmongering, or the “politics of fear.” Those who have sounded the warnings are “Islamophobic.” Many Westerners simply cannot convince themselves that so-called radical Islam and moderate Islam may be one and the same thing, and that Muslims who are genuinely pro-Western are not only not the majority, but not even a substantial minority of the world’s 1.8 billion followers of Islam.

Despite such a possibility, many in Europe and America are thrilled with the prospect that a West which traded stability for democracy, even when such a tradeoff was the only practical reality, will reap a whirlwind of its own making. Comments at many websites reveal the fantasies of anti-Semites convinced that the march of Arab democracy spells doom for Israel. Again, while such thinking is contemptible, it too reveals clarity: substantial numbers of Europeans and Americans view their own culture with contempt. It is a contempt premised on the idea that a lack of perfection is tantamount to utter corruption, and that if everything isn’t worth saving, then nothing is.

Such talk is cheap and one need only remember the gut reaction of the overwhelming majority of Americans and Europeans immediately following 9/11 to know it. That was the day when the theory of Western comeuppance gave way to the reality of it. The West could be forgiven for not recognizing the enormity of Islamic discontent then. We have no such excuses now, especially if the Middle East continues on its present trajectory, one day at a time, while the whole world watches.

We can hope for the best possible outcome, but we must prepare for the worst, even if that means preparing for a worldwide war. We must begin recognizing we’ve spent the last ten years hoping that what we’d like to believe about the majority of Muslims is likely nothing more than wishful thinking. No one truly knows what the majority of Muslims think. Maybe not even Muslims themselves. It is by their deeds that we shall know them. In that sense, who finally gains control in Egypt, if democratically elected, will speak volumes.

Clarity may not be much. But it’s far better than self-inflicted, politically correct delusion.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Article printed from FrontPage Magazine: http://frontpagemag.com

URL to article: http://frontpagemag.com/2011/02/04/in-search-of-the-moderate-muslim-world/


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: egypt; mohammedbadie; muslimworld

1 posted on 02/04/2011 5:34:36 AM PST by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Moderate Moslems are like the Munchkins in the land of OZ. They are cute figments of the imagination. Either you are in or out of Islam. Moderate moslems are individuals who think that they have escaped, temporarily, the tsunami Islam.

What part of convert or die is hard to understand?

2 posted on 02/04/2011 5:38:14 AM PST by x_plus_one (Who sews the wind reaps the storm...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
we must prepare for the worst, even if that means preparing for a worldwide war

We don't have the money to fight another war. We can't pay for all the hand outs the Democrats (with some Republican help) have voted into place to keep themselves in power. Another war of any significance would break us as a nation.

3 posted on 02/04/2011 5:38:30 AM PST by Hardastarboard (Bringing children to America without immigration documents is child abuse. Let's end it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

To be moderate, Islam must eschew Jihad, Sharia and Mad Mo’.


4 posted on 02/04/2011 5:40:26 AM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

If Diogenes were using a lamp to find the moderates, he better bring a super tanker of oil to fuel the lamp so it does not go out before he finds one.


5 posted on 02/04/2011 5:41:06 AM PST by Mouton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Islam is an insane rape and murder cult, from Mad Mo in the bat cave until now.

“Moderate” islam is its P.R. Trojan Horse.


6 posted on 02/04/2011 5:53:11 AM PST by Travis McGee (EnemiesForeignAndDomestic is now on Kindle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

http://www.greek-genocide.org/photo_genocide.html


7 posted on 02/04/2011 5:56:47 AM PST by gitmogrunt (Warning: Graphic Historical Photos of the handiwork of " Moderate Islamists" upon Christians)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

If a muslim truly follows islam then you can never use the term moderate to describe them.
islam is an evil cult based on oppression, fear, murder and terror.


8 posted on 02/04/2011 5:57:48 AM PST by SECURE AMERICA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

You have a good point. I do know moderate Muslims in Southeast Asia and they are good people. Two observation are necessary. One, since Muslims live among their fellow Muslims, the young people are subject to potential radicalization by their peers. Second, Muslims are more likely to be moderate the further they move from the basic beliefs of Islam. A bearded fellow dressed in white with a Muslim skull cap is not going to be your friend.


9 posted on 02/04/2011 6:01:55 AM PST by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
Middle East and terrorism, occasional political and Jewish issues Ping List. High Volume

If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.

..................

10 posted on 02/04/2011 6:02:44 AM PST by SJackson (In wine there is wisdom, In beer there is freedom, In water there is bacteria.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimSEA

“I do know moderate Muslims in Southeast Asia and they are good people.”

I say to you; “follow the money”. Peel the onion of a “moderate muslim” and you will find a “Crypto-Islamist”


11 posted on 02/04/2011 6:08:53 AM PST by snoringbear (Government is the Pimp,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Hardastarboard
We don't have the money to fight another war. We can't pay for all the hand outs the Democrats (with some Republican help) have voted into place to keep themselves in power. Another war of any significance would break us as a nation.

It would be the same war, only with different rules of engagement.

12 posted on 02/04/2011 6:29:50 AM PST by Sans-Culotte ( Pray for Obama- Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: snoringbear

No money involved but they are teachers at a Christian founded university.


13 posted on 02/04/2011 6:33:27 AM PST by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JimSEA
“No money involved but they are teachers at a Christian founded university.”

One does not know what one can not see. There are many perceived moderate Muslims here in the U.S.- professionals, live in the suburbs, friendly at work, etc, who covertly subsidize various Muslim charities who are actually fronts and money conduits to radical Islamic terrorist organization. Again, peel the onion and follow the money - you may be amazed at what you find...

14 posted on 02/04/2011 7:06:12 AM PST by snoringbear (Government is the Pimp,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

In Search of the Moderate Muslim World
Otherwise known as Fantasy Land


15 posted on 02/04/2011 7:13:13 AM PST by BuffaloJack (Re-Elect President Sarah Palin 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snoringbear

Then what? Kill them all regardless. Nonsense.


16 posted on 02/04/2011 7:15:02 AM PST by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

There are no moderate Muslims, and there is only one kind of good Muslim.


17 posted on 02/04/2011 7:20:17 AM PST by Republic of Texas (Socialism Always Fails)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee; Qbert; SJackson
Clearly, as you say, the concept of a “Moderate” islam is its Trojan Horse.

Arguably, anyone that follows Islam is a terrorist:
Qur’an:8:39 “Fight them until all opposition ends and all submit to Allah.”
Qur’an:9:5 “Fight and kill the disbelievers wherever you find them, take them captive, harass them, lie in wait and ambush them using every stratagem of war.”
Qur’an:9:29 “Fight those who do not believe until they all surrender, paying the protective tax in submission.”
Qur’an:9:123 “Fight the unbelievers around you, and let them find harshness in you.”
Qur’an:47:4 “When you clash with the unbelieving Infidels in battle, smite their necks until you overpower them, killing and wounding many of them…Thus are you commanded by Allah to continue carrying out Jihad against the unbelieving infidels until they submit to Islam.”

And, those 1400 year old views continue to this day, as Qbert points out:
- “Arab and Muslim regimes are betraying their people by failing to confront the Muslim’s real enemies, not only Israel but also the United States. Waging jihad against both of these infidels is a commandment of Allah that cannot be disregarded.
- “All Muslims…crucially need to understand that (what) the (Muslim) nation seeks can only be attained through jihad and sacrifice and by raising a jihadi generation that pursues death just as the enemies pursue life.”
Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood leader Mohammed Badie, October 2010:

Most of the FReepers on this thread have a clear understanding of the threat.

Will America's political leaders confront the reality in time?

18 posted on 02/04/2011 7:45:02 AM PST by frog in a pot (We need a working definition of "domestic enemies" if the oath of office is to have meaning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SECURE AMERICA

I would say that there are Moderate Muslims.
The problem is they’re comparable to normal Germans during 1933-1945, while “Radical” Muslims are comparable to the SA and SS .
The moderates give cover to the “radicals” so that they can move about freely in civilized countries, provide them money through mosques and “Islamic Charities” and wage “Lawfare” on their behalf to make it politically incorrect to “profile” or criticize Muslims or Muslim theology.
Just like there were “good Germans” in Nazi Germany, there are good Muslims. Egyptian Muslims offered themselves as human shields for Coptic Christians after the recent attacks; some Imams have issued fatwahs against terrorism; and an Imam said the recent homicide bomber in Russia would “go to Hell.” I don’t if he said it Arabic, though, so it might not be binding...

So, predictably, its more complicated than we’d like.


19 posted on 02/04/2011 7:46:56 AM PST by Little Ray (The Gods of the Copybook Heading, with terror and slaughter return!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

A moderate muslim is a radical muslim who keeps his views to himself.


20 posted on 02/04/2011 7:49:58 AM PST by reagan_fanatic (Snowpalooza 2011)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimSEA
“Then what? Kill them all regardless. Nonsense.”

Ummm, perhaps not all. But, this conflict is more than a Islamic vs infidel struggle. This goes back to the Greeks vs Persians and was reincarnated as a religious war after Mohammad came on the scene. But, back to who needs killing; the only way these fundamentalist Islamists have ever been contained has been by the use of direct and brutal use of force. That's what it will take again to put them back in the bottle so to speak. These people only understand and respect one thing - and it ain't appeasement...

21 posted on 02/04/2011 8:16:49 AM PST by snoringbear (Government is the Pimp,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Searching for moderate muslims is like searching for the Elmer Fudd... both are figments of a writers imagination.

LLS

22 posted on 02/04/2011 8:24:18 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (WOLVERINES!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray
Much of what you say is true, but let me put a sharper point on the issue.

It seems possible to argue that the “good people” in Nazi Germany of whom you speak were also either naïve, indifferent, perhaps selfish, irresponsible, certainly intimidated and coerced, or otherwise frightened to the point of inaction. With hindsight, it is clear those good people had a responsibility at least to their families and neighbors to react – perhaps initially with stronger politicians - to Hitler’s early 1930’s political machinations, which were largely accomplished with deception, street thugs, voter intimidation, etc.

Perhaps that is the lesson for us today and the lesson for “peaceful moslems”.

Unfortunately, good people do not always timely react to infringements in meaningful ways, if at all. And bad people tend to increase their overstepping until resistance is ineffectual.

So we select politicians to safeguard our systems, and then sometimes fail to hold them accountable.

23 posted on 02/04/2011 8:28:12 AM PST by frog in a pot (We need a working definition of "domestic enemies" if the oath of office is to have meaning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: JimSEA
If the CRUSADES had taken care of business... we would not have the problem we do today. After 13 centuries of fighting these satanists... you would think Western Civilization would learn.

LLS

24 posted on 02/04/2011 8:28:12 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (WOLVERINES!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

“In Search of the Moderate Muslim World”

Keep lookin’. You ain’t gonna find it.

If Diogenes could talk, he’d say, “better get a long-burnin’ lamp!”


25 posted on 02/04/2011 8:44:28 AM PST by Grumplestiltskin (I may look new, but it's only deja vu!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frog in a pot

I guess my point was that there were “good” Germans, “normal” Germans, and Nazis.
And they all got bombed equally.
It should be the same for Islam. Once the issue becomes violent, its not our job to “sort them out.” We need to go into the “kill ‘em all” mode. Anything else is a waste of resources and creates unecessary risks for our service members. The only exception is for those who are trustworthy enough to fight our side (and the Afghan police and armed forces don’t seem to be in that group... I’d be happy to hear differently).
And, as anyone who has read Arithmetic on the Frontier knows, the enemy’s lives are cheap and “...we are dear.”


26 posted on 02/07/2011 9:31:05 AM PST by Little Ray (The Gods of the Copybook Heading, with terror and slaughter return!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson