Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House Wants (unconstitutional) Obamacare on Slow Legal Track
2/04/11

Posted on 02/04/2011 12:39:08 PM PST by Libloather

Bloomberg News link only - White House Wants Obamacare on Slow Legal Track


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: commiecare; judgevinson; legal; obamacare; whitehouse
Friday afternoon news dump? I don't think so. The rookie Hussein is up to his elbows in trouble right now.

BTW, leftists HATE the term 'Obamacare.' Please feel free to use it as much as possible.

1 posted on 02/04/2011 12:39:12 PM PST by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Too bad, so sad.

We want it there yesterday.

2 posted on 02/04/2011 12:40:41 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum ("If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun." -- Barry Soetoro, June 11, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Too damned bad. The judiciary is a separate branch of government from the executive branch.

Obongwater doesn’t get to decide.


3 posted on 02/04/2011 12:42:31 PM PST by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

This White House wants to do as much damage to the U.S.A. as possible. Slowing the inevitable SCOTUS confrontation will help them achieve that goal.

Businesses are basically catatonic, unable to make important decisions concerning their employees.


4 posted on 02/04/2011 12:43:16 PM PST by SatinDoll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Of course they do. They longer it takes, the more chance they have to stack the deck. Who knows - one of the constitutionalists on the Supreme Court could resign or otherwise vacate their spot, giving barama a chance to appoint to fill their seat. One more SCJ would be all it would take.


5 posted on 02/04/2011 12:43:29 PM PST by SuzyQue (Remember to think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd

I would love to hear a report the SC is taking the case on the fast track and I hope it is Roberts who states it.

Bring it on.


6 posted on 02/04/2011 12:49:33 PM PST by Mouton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

No... what these scumbags want to do is implement as much as possible as quick as possible and then scream about how many gov’t jobs are lost and all the money spent on infrstructure, the best method is still just to defund the entire boondogle.


7 posted on 02/04/2011 12:49:52 PM PST by mapmaker77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Newsmax is Bloomberg ?

That link is to Newsmax.


8 posted on 02/04/2011 12:50:21 PM PST by Beagle8U (Free Republic -- One stop shopping ....... It's the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SuzyQue
Who knows - one of the constitutionalists on the Supreme Court could resign or otherwise vacate their spot, giving barama a chance to appoint to fill their seat. One more SCJ would be all it would take.

Don't ever believe one might not leave the court via the "Chicago Way"!

9 posted on 02/04/2011 12:51:30 PM PST by Erik Latranyi (Too many conservatives urge retreat when the war of politics doesn't go their way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Party affiliation has made the difference so far with health care. The two trial judges who declared the law unconstitutional -- Hudson and Florida’s Roger Vinson -- are both Republican appointees. The judges who upheld the law -- Norman Moon of Virginia and George Caram Steeh of Michigan -- were appointed by Democratic presidents.

Now we understand what Chukie Schumer meant when he identified the three branches of Government as the Executive, the Senate and the House. The Justice Department is now just a sub-branch of the Senate. Smart guy that Schumer.

10 posted on 02/04/2011 12:52:04 PM PST by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U

If you bother to read the entire article there is a copyright to Bloomberg at the bottom.


11 posted on 02/04/2011 12:52:57 PM PST by CajunConservative (0, we'll stop treating you like a dog, when you stop treating us like a hydrant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Well, if angering leftists is what you’re after,
what about changing the name of the conservative ideology to

“Americanism”


12 posted on 02/04/2011 12:53:36 PM PST by MrB (Tagline suspended for important announcement on my about page. Click my handle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mouton

Ideally it needs to hit in mid September of 2012, during the final run into the Congressional elections.


13 posted on 02/04/2011 12:54:28 PM PST by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint

Oops. Make that the Judicial Branch.


14 posted on 02/04/2011 12:54:33 PM PST by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

It is up to the House to not fund one penny of it. Maybe defund HHS. They have the cards. We dealt em the cards. If they don’t Play em I won’t go through this again. It will be time for a real party.


15 posted on 02/04/2011 12:56:08 PM PST by screaminsunshine (Surfers Rule)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CajunConservative
I read the article, but I guess I didn't pay attention to the bloomberg notation.
16 posted on 02/04/2011 12:57:32 PM PST by Beagle8U (Free Republic -- One stop shopping ....... It's the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Libloather; All
"White House Wants (unconstitutional) Obamacare on Slow Legal Track"


17 posted on 02/04/2011 1:01:37 PM PST by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SuzyQue

Here is how the deck will be stacked...everyones favorite wussy senator is about to f... up the FLA judges ruling

Barrasso, Graham Introduce Legislation Allowing States to ‘Opt-Out’ of Obamacare

WASHINGTON – U.S. Senators Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina) and John Barrasso (R-Wyoming) today introduced S.244, The State Health Care Choice Act, to repeal and replace Obamacare by allowing states to ‘Opt-Out’ of its major provisions. Under the legislation, states could choose to ‘Opt-Out’ of:


18 posted on 02/04/2011 1:03:01 PM PST by BubbaJunebug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U
I read the article, but I guess I didn't pay attention to the Bloomberg notation.

© Copyright 2010 Bloomberg News. All rights reserved.

I'm trying to stay out of FReeper prison as much as possible.

19 posted on 02/04/2011 1:03:50 PM PST by Libloather (The epitome of civility.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

What about Levin’s “641 strategy?” 18 USC 641, according to him, makes it a felony for state bureaucrats to tap ObamaCare funds for a law that has been voided, assuming the usual operation of Judicial Review as modernly practiced. So either judicial review is null and void, or ObamaCare is null and void. In light of this dilemma, surely state AGs owe it to their bureaucratic constituencies to warn them to stop implementing Obamacare now or risk prosecution for felony. I’m still thinking about how to do this here is Illinois. Our implementing agency is the Department of Insurance (DOI). I have an email in to Mark asking how to pursue this, but I’m not really expecting a reply. All (reasonable) suggestions are welcome.


20 posted on 02/04/2011 1:05:04 PM PST by Springfield Reformer (Winston Churchill: No Peace Till Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BubbaJunebug

Here is how the deck will be stacked...everyones favorite wussy senator is about to f... up the FLA judges ruling

Barrasso, Graham Introduce Legislation Allowing States to ‘Opt-Out’ of Obamacare

WASHINGTON – U.S. Senators Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina) and John Barrasso (R-Wyoming) today introduced S.244, The State Health Care Choice Act, to repeal and replace Obamacare by allowing states to ‘Opt-Out’ of its major provisions. Under the legislation, states could choose to ‘Opt-Out’ of:


Then the opt out states are now experiencing taxation without benefitation. So most of the red states opt out, and pay the blue states health care.

Please just kill this monster.
21 posted on 02/04/2011 1:12:45 PM PST by RushingWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U

With all of the Righthaven crap it’s really best to just link and excerpt. They are going after individual posters now not just the websites.


22 posted on 02/04/2011 1:13:05 PM PST by CajunConservative (0, we'll stop treating you like a dog, when you stop treating us like a hydrant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

if the courts don’t find the brown Clown in contempt we ought to pull an Egypt on HIM.Love to see his a$$ physically hauled out of the People’s House.


23 posted on 02/04/2011 1:15:50 PM PST by Renegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Springfield Reformer
I have an email in to Mark asking how to pursue this, but I’m not really expecting a reply.

If you do get an answer, please do post it here. That could be very cool.

24 posted on 02/04/2011 1:21:40 PM PST by ProfoundMan (Time to finish the Reagan Revolution! - RightyPics.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
White House Wants (unconstitutional) Obamacare on Slow Legal Track

Hey, Barry! After the judge's decision in Florida, it's not okay for you to continue implementing this until it reaches the Supreme Court. You're supposed to cease implementation until such time as the Supreme Court tells you to resume or until the Republican House funds your efforts. The House needs immediate hearings about 1. Barry's defiance of this judge's ruling, 2. Barry's defiance of the ruling against the drilling moratorium, and a bunch of other things.
25 posted on 02/04/2011 1:21:53 PM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Renegade

bttt


26 posted on 02/04/2011 1:23:56 PM PST by Guenevere (....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

that tells me the Supremes just might take the case on an expedited basis, if only to get even with Barry for his dressing-down at last year’s SOTU.


27 posted on 02/04/2011 1:25:01 PM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd
Obongwater doesn’t get to decide.

Especially since he dissed the SCOTUS justices so publicly at last year's SOTU speech.

28 posted on 02/04/2011 1:25:38 PM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (Tyrants flourish only when they achieve a standing army, an enslaved press, and a disarmed populace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ProfoundMan

You may reply upon it.


29 posted on 02/04/2011 1:49:49 PM PST by Springfield Reformer (Winston Churchill: No Peace Till Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Renegade

We’ve learned from Barky that a few 10’s of thousands of people demanding a new government need to be “listened to” and that the government must change NOW.

So, what of the 9/12 rally, Barky?
What if they had stuck around a while, demanding your ouster?


30 posted on 02/04/2011 1:53:04 PM PST by MrB (Tagline suspended for important announcement on my about page. Click my handle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Springfield Reformer; Liz; AT7Saluki; writer33
...according to him, makes it a felony for state bureaucrats to tap ObamaCare funds for a law that has been voided

I like it. Flee Levin is on my listening docket tonight. Replay of Laura Ingraham is on right now. (My fav - soundbite of the week segment.)

31 posted on 02/04/2011 2:04:51 PM PST by Libloather (The epitome of civility.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SuzyQue; Stillwaters
Of course they do. They longer it takes, the more chance they have to stack the deck. Who knows - one of the constitutionalists on the Supreme Court could resign or otherwise vacate their spot, giving barama a chance to appoint to fill their seat. One more SCJ would be all it would take.

Absolutely, that's what they're hoping for. It's a scary thing knowing that our fate can be held in the hand of one man/woman this way. It's the ultimate example of elections having consequences.

32 posted on 02/04/2011 2:18:26 PM PST by lonevoice (Where the Welfare State is on the march, the Police State is not far behind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

If the Administration actually believed that Obamacare was constitutional, they would want it ruled as such by the SCOTUS as soon as possible. In particular, before the 2012 election.

Then Jarrett, as has been somewhat loosely reported elsewhere, wouldn’t be holding meetings on how to keep Obamacare from being a “liability” in 2012.


33 posted on 02/04/2011 2:46:24 PM PST by fightinJAG (Americans: the only people in the world protesting AGAINST government "benefits.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: aruanan

Hey, Barry! After the judge’s decision in Florida, it’s not okay for you to continue implementing this until it reaches the Supreme Court.
***************************************************
Unfortunately the likelihood that the Vinson ruling will be appealed by the Government is 100%. If the 11th Circuit Court stays the ruling while the case is being reviewed then Obamacare will be back as The Law of the Land. This is the most likely state of affairs for at least the next 12 months and maybe longer. And it could happen within the next 10 days. Stay tuned and pray that the 11th will do the right thing and deny the motion to stay the Vinson ruling. In that case Obamacare is once again DOA.


34 posted on 02/04/2011 4:15:13 PM PST by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson