Skip to comments.White House Wants (unconstitutional) Obamacare on Slow Legal Track
Posted on 02/04/2011 12:39:08 PM PST by Libloather
Bloomberg News link only - White House Wants Obamacare on Slow Legal Track
BTW, leftists HATE the term 'Obamacare.' Please feel free to use it as much as possible.
We want it there yesterday.
Too damned bad. The judiciary is a separate branch of government from the executive branch.
Obongwater doesn’t get to decide.
This White House wants to do as much damage to the U.S.A. as possible. Slowing the inevitable SCOTUS confrontation will help them achieve that goal.
Businesses are basically catatonic, unable to make important decisions concerning their employees.
Of course they do. They longer it takes, the more chance they have to stack the deck. Who knows - one of the constitutionalists on the Supreme Court could resign or otherwise vacate their spot, giving barama a chance to appoint to fill their seat. One more SCJ would be all it would take.
I would love to hear a report the SC is taking the case on the fast track and I hope it is Roberts who states it.
Bring it on.
No... what these scumbags want to do is implement as much as possible as quick as possible and then scream about how many gov’t jobs are lost and all the money spent on infrstructure, the best method is still just to defund the entire boondogle.
Newsmax is Bloomberg ?
That link is to Newsmax.
Don't ever believe one might not leave the court via the "Chicago Way"!
Now we understand what Chukie Schumer meant when he identified the three branches of Government as the Executive, the Senate and the House. The Justice Department is now just a sub-branch of the Senate. Smart guy that Schumer.
If you bother to read the entire article there is a copyright to Bloomberg at the bottom.
Well, if angering leftists is what you’re after,
what about changing the name of the conservative ideology to
Ideally it needs to hit in mid September of 2012, during the final run into the Congressional elections.
Oops. Make that the Judicial Branch.
It is up to the House to not fund one penny of it. Maybe defund HHS. They have the cards. We dealt em the cards. If they don’t Play em I won’t go through this again. It will be time for a real party.
Here is how the deck will be stacked...everyones favorite wussy senator is about to f... up the FLA judges ruling
Barrasso, Graham Introduce Legislation Allowing States to Opt-Out of Obamacare
WASHINGTON U.S. Senators Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina) and John Barrasso (R-Wyoming) today introduced S.244, The State Health Care Choice Act, to repeal and replace Obamacare by allowing states to Opt-Out of its major provisions. Under the legislation, states could choose to Opt-Out of:
© Copyright 2010 Bloomberg News. All rights reserved.
I'm trying to stay out of FReeper prison as much as possible.
What about Levin’s “641 strategy?” 18 USC 641, according to him, makes it a felony for state bureaucrats to tap ObamaCare funds for a law that has been voided, assuming the usual operation of Judicial Review as modernly practiced. So either judicial review is null and void, or ObamaCare is null and void. In light of this dilemma, surely state AGs owe it to their bureaucratic constituencies to warn them to stop implementing Obamacare now or risk prosecution for felony. I’m still thinking about how to do this here is Illinois. Our implementing agency is the Department of Insurance (DOI). I have an email in to Mark asking how to pursue this, but I’m not really expecting a reply. All (reasonable) suggestions are welcome.
With all of the Righthaven crap it’s really best to just link and excerpt. They are going after individual posters now not just the websites.
if the courts don’t find the brown Clown in contempt we ought to pull an Egypt on HIM.Love to see his a$$ physically hauled out of the People’s House.
If you do get an answer, please do post it here. That could be very cool.
that tells me the Supremes just might take the case on an expedited basis, if only to get even with Barry for his dressing-down at last year’s SOTU.
Especially since he dissed the SCOTUS justices so publicly at last year's SOTU speech.
You may reply upon it.
We’ve learned from Barky that a few 10’s of thousands of people demanding a new government need to be “listened to” and that the government must change NOW.
So, what of the 9/12 rally, Barky?
What if they had stuck around a while, demanding your ouster?
I like it. Flee Levin is on my listening docket tonight. Replay of Laura Ingraham is on right now. (My fav - soundbite of the week segment.)
Absolutely, that's what they're hoping for. It's a scary thing knowing that our fate can be held in the hand of one man/woman this way. It's the ultimate example of elections having consequences.
If the Administration actually believed that Obamacare was constitutional, they would want it ruled as such by the SCOTUS as soon as possible. In particular, before the 2012 election.
Then Jarrett, as has been somewhat loosely reported elsewhere, wouldn’t be holding meetings on how to keep Obamacare from being a “liability” in 2012.
Hey, Barry! After the judge’s decision in Florida, it’s not okay for you to continue implementing this until it reaches the Supreme Court.
Unfortunately the likelihood that the Vinson ruling will be appealed by the Government is 100%. If the 11th Circuit Court stays the ruling while the case is being reviewed then Obamacare will be back as The Law of the Land. This is the most likely state of affairs for at least the next 12 months and maybe longer. And it could happen within the next 10 days. Stay tuned and pray that the 11th will do the right thing and deny the motion to stay the Vinson ruling. In that case Obamacare is once again DOA.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.