Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Court bans man with low IQ from having sex
The Telegraph ^ | 04 Feb 2011 | By Martin Beckford

Posted on 02/06/2011 5:04:51 AM PST by jacknhoo

A man with a low IQ has been banned from having sex by a High Court judge who admitted the case raised questions about “civil liberties and personal autonomy”.

Under the judge's order, the man is now subject to 'close supervision' by the local authority to ensure he does not break the highly unusual order

The 41 year-old had been in a relationship with a man whom he lived with and told officials “it would make me feel happy” for it to continue.

But his local council decided his “vigorous sex drive” was inappropriate and that with an IQ of 48 and a “moderate” learning disability, he did not understand what he was doing.

A psychiatrist involved in the case even tried to prevent the man being given sex education, on the grounds that it would leave him “confused”.

Mr Justice Mostyn said the case was “legally, intellectually and morally” complex as sex is “one of the most basic human functions” and the court must “tread especially carefully” when the state tries to curtail it.

But he agreed that the man, known only as Alan, should not be allowed to have sex with anyone on the grounds that he did not have the mental capacity to understand the health risks associated with his actions.

Under the judge’s order, the man is now subject to “close supervision” by the local authority that provides his accommodation, in order to ensure he does not break the highly unusual order.

The judge concluded: “I therefore make a declaration that at the present time Alan does not have the capacity to consent to and engage in sexual relations.

“In such circumstances it is agreed that the present régime for Alan's supervision and for the prevention of future sexual activity is in his best interests.”

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: freedom; homosexual; liberty; secular
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
When I first read the title...I thought of Margaret Sanger, eugenicists, etc. Then, afer I read the first two paragraphs, I was mis-led. Then when I got to the end of the article, it turns out my first instincts were absolutely correct.
1 posted on 02/06/2011 5:04:54 AM PST by jacknhoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jacknhoo

homosexuality is a mental disorder driven by instinct!


2 posted on 02/06/2011 5:07:52 AM PST by Lessthantolerant (The State is diametrically opposed to our search for a better living.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jacknhoo

Put into perspective, if it happened here, it would mean the end of the democrats forever!


3 posted on 02/06/2011 5:11:39 AM PST by Caipirabob ( Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jacknhoo

IQ of 48 and only a moderate learning disorder...


4 posted on 02/06/2011 5:12:27 AM PST by brooklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Caipirabob

Ha! My thought was similar. The Great Society wouldn’t have been so ‘great’.


5 posted on 02/06/2011 5:13:52 AM PST by Matt Hatter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jacknhoo

So what your saying is this would be the end of the progressive liberal socialist commie radical democrate, no?


6 posted on 02/06/2011 5:18:54 AM PST by ronnie raygun (V.........................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jacknhoo

Is he still allowed to vote? Probably encouraged to.


7 posted on 02/06/2011 5:22:20 AM PST by SampleMan (If all of the people currently oppressed shared a common geography, bullets would already be flying.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jacknhoo

funny, you only have to watch the daily talk shows to know of lots of other people of low intelligence spitting out unwanted kids with multiple fathers like a factory, they treat having a child as some welfase bonus. Now if only we could make sure they did’nt get unwantedly and constantly pregnant.


8 posted on 02/06/2011 5:24:54 AM PST by sunmars
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan

If he lived in Chicago, he’d get to vote - twice.


9 posted on 02/06/2011 5:27:21 AM PST by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jacknhoo

If only...


10 posted on 02/06/2011 5:28:27 AM PST by MayflowerMadam (Whatever you are filled with will spill out when you're bumped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jacknhoo
Court bans man with low IQ from having sex

sounds like a terrible movie with Ashton Kutcher, or Jim Carey, or Adam Sandler..or..well you get what I am saying..

11 posted on 02/06/2011 5:28:51 AM PST by BerniesFriend (Sarah Palin-"Lord knows she's attractive" says bitter Andrea Mitchell and the rest of the MSM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Court bans man with low IQ from having sex



Wait, what now? They can do that?
12 posted on 02/06/2011 5:35:28 AM PST by WaterBoard ("PBR Street Gang this is Almighty, over..")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jacknhoo

He’s not going to get pregnant...


13 posted on 02/06/2011 5:44:18 AM PST by FatherofFive (Islam is evil and must be eradicated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jacknhoo

Liberal Judges and Politicians with their mental disorders are a far greater menace to society than homosexual morons who sow fudge with their sperms.


14 posted on 02/06/2011 5:46:36 AM PST by tflabo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FatherofFive
He’s not going to get *cough* himself *cough* pregnant...

There, all fixed.

But speaking of that, why not allow him Lewinskis? /it's not really sex> /Clinton>

Cheers!

15 posted on 02/06/2011 5:58:13 AM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: WaterBoard

Court bans man with low IQ from having sex.Now we know why Michelle won’t have another child.


16 posted on 02/06/2011 5:58:19 AM PST by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: jacknhoo

“Court bans man with low IQ from having sex”

I’d have thought Plugs Biden and his old lady would be too old to breed, but better safe than sorry.


17 posted on 02/06/2011 6:00:27 AM PST by exile (I will NOT submit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jacknhoo

So if you have a 100 IQ, that makes it right??


18 posted on 02/06/2011 6:01:59 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan
Is he still allowed to vote? Probably encouraged to.

Of course, but, again, only under "close supervision" (as in, "you better vote for this one if you know what's good for you").
19 posted on 02/06/2011 6:05:50 AM PST by Oceander (The phrase "good enough for government work" is not meant as a compliment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: WaterBoard

Despite the medias fawning, I always knew Clinton was a dummy.

20 posted on 02/06/2011 6:07:04 AM PST by mountn man (The pleasure you get from life, is equal to the attitude you put into it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson