Skip to comments.Jury picking begins today in Ciavarella trial (Kids for Cash Judge)
Posted on 02/07/2011 2:45:49 PM PST by Born Conservative
SCRANTON Prosecutors and defense attorneys in the corruption trial of former Judge Mark Ciavarella will begin questioning a pool of 95 potential jurors this morning in hopes of finding a panel of 12 jurors and four alternates.
Jury selection is set to begin at 8:30 a.m. before U.S. District Judge Edwin Kosik in the federal courthouse in Scranton. Attorneys in the case have estimated the process will take at least a week, possibly longer.
Ciavarellas attorneys, Al Flora and William Ruzzo, had requested that each juror be questioned individually, arguing it would allow attorneys a better opportunity to detect any biases or opinions about Ciavarellas guilt or innocence.
Kosik denied that request, but left open the possibility of changing his mind once he sees how the selection process is progressing. Kosik has also left open the possibility the trial could be changed to another jurisdiction if he finds an impartial panel cannot be found.
The exact process by which the jurors will be selected remained unclear as of Friday, but its expected Kosik will assemble the jury pool in a courtroom and ask questions that will be answered simultaneously by all.
Dr. Richard Waites of The Advocates, a national trial consulting firm with offices in 17 cities, said the defense and prosecution will each be given a certain number of pre-emptory challenges, which means they can strike any juror for any reason. They do not have to reveal their reasoning.
In most cases each side is given six pre-emptory challenges, Waites said. Ciavarellas attorneys had sought 10 such challenges.
Its not known whether Kosik had ruled on that matter yet.
Waites said he expects each side will also be given an unlimited number of challenges for cause.
In those cases, the defense or prosecution must state the reason for ousting a potential juror, such as the person expressed an opinion about the defendants guilt or innocence. The opposing party can object to the challenge.
Kosik would then decide if the challenge was valid.
Waites has no direct connection to the Ciavarella case. Speaking generally, he said the jury-selection process is one of the most crucial aspects of any case.
The defense and prosecution will each be searching for the ideal juror they believe will respond best to their presentation.
Two of the most important areas attorneys will be looking at are a persons attitude toward the specific case and life experiences they have had that may be similar to an issue in the case.
The makeup of a jury can make or break a case, Waites said. Jurors come into jury selection with thousands of attitudes about things and life experiences. The question in every jury selection is whether those attitudes and life experiences are relative in this particular case.
Another key assessment attorneys will use is the authoritarian rating of each juror, he said.
People who are highly authoritarian believe in the rule of law and that if someone breaks the law, that person should be found guilty, regardless of the situation, Waites said.
Theres no gray about it, he said.
Those with a low authoritarian rating believe there are laws that must be obeyed, but they believe every situation has to be judged independently, he said.
For the prosecution, theyre going to want high authoritarians who are easily made to be angry or incensed by a judge who would break the rules, he said. These people are generally very scrutinizing and very detail oriented.
The defense wasnt the mirror opposite. They want people who are global thinkers who have had a good life and are not suspicious of other people. They would go into a trial thinking someone would never do something like this. They want to see the prosecutions evidence.
What’s the case about?
Sounds like the evidence is pretty blatant — all there is to dicker about is the penalty.
Even though I don’t always trust Wikipedia, it’s explained well here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kids_for_cash_scandal
Wonder what they did to have the judge throw out the plea agreement. Hopefully they’ll be lock away for the rest of their life for what they did, would be even better if they put them in the general population instead of some club fed.
Actually, I've found Wiki fairly reliable when the subject has nothing to do with politics or other controversies. If I want to cite a specific fact from a Wiki article, though, I usually check it against other sources.
And this Wiki is well sourced....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.