Posted on 02/08/2011 9:04:42 AM PST by reaganaut1
Of the 2,200 students at Intermediate School 61 in Corona, Queens, 86 percent receive free cafeteria lunches. Some others pay a reduced price, and some are supposed to pay full price.
But not all of their parents pay what they are supposed to, and recently, the schools principal, Joseph Lisa, has been spending a lot of time trying to collect money from them.
He has cornered them in the hallways. He has offered them gentle reminders after school meetings. He has called them and sent them letters suggesting payment plans for debts that might amount to $20 or $30.
We give them little pieces of paper saying, This week you owe $5, $3, 50 cents, but as soon as we collect it from one parent, theres another whos falling behind, Mr. Lisa said.
The city used to pick up the unpaid tabs. Since 2004, it has absorbed at least $42 million in unpaid lunch fees.
But that is a luxury it can no longer afford, according to the Department of Education, which has weathered several rounds of budget cuts, with more still to come. So it has been telling principals to collect overdue lunch money or risk having it docked from their school budgets.
Of the citys 1,600 schools, 1,043 owe a collective $2.5 million to the Education Department for meals served in the first three months of this school year. That puts them on track to be $8 million behind by the end of the school year.
New York Citys lunch money problem is costly and complicated, but it is not unique. The economic downturn has school administrators and legislators all over the country scratching for savings even as more parents are falling behind in lunch fees.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
That's very interesting--I didn't know that.
who needs credit when someone else is buying your food......
Life is wonderful in the good old USSA!
so, the department of education is also responsible for:...
establishment and maintenance of restauraunt facilities...
clean up of garbage and trash from premises...
security of building and said occupants...
limosine and other transportation to and from facilty for all that attend...
and I thought schools were a place for learning....
It’s because we no longer give babies honey.
Still assumes that there's food available to buy...I don't think that's a safe assumption long term.
What part of “if they don’t pay, stop feeding the little #&@*s” isn’t clear?
Rare but can be deadly. Stupid.
Parents conceived during the Carter administration?
heh. True, and ironically it’s the 300 parents that *are* paying for the lunches that are branded as bums. Why worry over the small percentage that does pay? The Feds pay for free/reduced lunches, but if a “payer” doesn’t pay up, then it comes out of local school system’s funds.
Also, the reason the rate of free/reduced lunches is so high is that the federal government distributes a big chunk of educational dollars based on community “need”. So the more kids that are approved for free lunches, the more money the school district gets. My local district begs parents to fill out the free lunch forms if they can get approved, even if the parents fully intend to pay for lunch themselves anyway.
Here we give the elementary kids a cheese sandwich and milk until they get their parents to pay up. The middle and high school kids don’t get anything. We make sure that the ‘poor baby’ crowd understands that it’s the parents job to feed their kids, not the school.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.